Changing the national height system and GEOID model in Latvia

According to the decision of IAG Reference Frame Sub-commission for Europe (EUREF) the EVRF2007 solution as the vertical reference has to be deployed in EU countries.The new height system LAS-2000,5 had been enacted as the European Vertical Reference System‘s EVRF2007 realization in Latvia and the n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Janis Balodis, Katerina Morozova, Gunars Silabriedis, Maris Kalinka, Kriss Balodis, Ingus Mitrofanovs, Irina Baltmane, Izolde Jumare
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2016-04-01
Series:Geodesy and Cartography
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/GAC/article/view/2502
_version_ 1818873167550087168
author Janis Balodis
Katerina Morozova
Gunars Silabriedis
Maris Kalinka
Kriss Balodis
Ingus Mitrofanovs
Irina Baltmane
Izolde Jumare
author_facet Janis Balodis
Katerina Morozova
Gunars Silabriedis
Maris Kalinka
Kriss Balodis
Ingus Mitrofanovs
Irina Baltmane
Izolde Jumare
author_sort Janis Balodis
collection DOAJ
description According to the decision of IAG Reference Frame Sub-commission for Europe (EUREF) the EVRF2007 solution as the vertical reference has to be deployed in EU countries.The new height system LAS-2000,5 had been enacted as the European Vertical Reference System‘s EVRF2007 realization in Latvia and the new geoid model LV‘14 had been introduced by Latvian authority Latvian Geospatial Information Agency. However, the appreciation of the quality of quasi-geoid model LV‘14 is rather contradictious among the users in Latvia. The independent estimate and comparison of the two Latvian geoid models developed till now has been performed by the Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics. Previous geoid model LV98 which was developed for Baltic-1977 height system almost 20 years ago is outdated now. Preparatory actions described in order to fulfil the task of comparison the geoids in two different height systems. The equations and transformation parameters are presented in this article for the normal height conversion from Baltic-1977 height system to the Latvian realization named LAS-2000,5. The comparison is performed of both Latvian quasigeoid models – the new one LV‘14 and previous LV98. The quality of both models estimated by controlling the geoid heights at the properly densified GNSS/levelling network sites. The distribution of discrepancies in comparison with normal distribution N(x,μ,s) is depicted in corresponding figures. For LV‘14 quasi-geoid model the standard deviation of discrepancies is 3.2 cm, 75% of discrepancies x ≤ 3.2 cm. For LV98 quasigeoid model the standard deviation of discrepancies is 4.7 cm, 80% of discrepancies x ≤ 6 cm. Without doubt, the newly developed LV‘14 quasi-geoid model is of higher quality.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T12:50:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e13005411957482aa554abff6d85c6f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2029-6991
2029-7009
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T12:50:24Z
publishDate 2016-04-01
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
record_format Article
series Geodesy and Cartography
spelling doaj.art-e13005411957482aa554abff6d85c6f82022-12-21T20:20:36ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityGeodesy and Cartography2029-69912029-70092016-04-0142110.3846/20296991.2016.1168009Changing the national height system and GEOID model in LatviaJanis Balodis0Katerina Morozova1Gunars Silabriedis2Maris Kalinka3Kriss Balodis4Ingus Mitrofanovs5Irina Baltmane6Izolde Jumare7Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, University of Latvia, Riga, LatviaInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, University of Latvia, Riga, LatviaInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, University of Latvia, Riga, LatviaInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, University of Latvia, Riga, LatviaInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, University of Latvia, Riga, LatviaInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, University of Latvia, Riga, LatviaInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, University of Latvia, Riga, LatviaInstitute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, University of Latvia, Riga, LatviaAccording to the decision of IAG Reference Frame Sub-commission for Europe (EUREF) the EVRF2007 solution as the vertical reference has to be deployed in EU countries.The new height system LAS-2000,5 had been enacted as the European Vertical Reference System‘s EVRF2007 realization in Latvia and the new geoid model LV‘14 had been introduced by Latvian authority Latvian Geospatial Information Agency. However, the appreciation of the quality of quasi-geoid model LV‘14 is rather contradictious among the users in Latvia. The independent estimate and comparison of the two Latvian geoid models developed till now has been performed by the Institute of Geodesy and Geoinformatics. Previous geoid model LV98 which was developed for Baltic-1977 height system almost 20 years ago is outdated now. Preparatory actions described in order to fulfil the task of comparison the geoids in two different height systems. The equations and transformation parameters are presented in this article for the normal height conversion from Baltic-1977 height system to the Latvian realization named LAS-2000,5. The comparison is performed of both Latvian quasigeoid models – the new one LV‘14 and previous LV98. The quality of both models estimated by controlling the geoid heights at the properly densified GNSS/levelling network sites. The distribution of discrepancies in comparison with normal distribution N(x,μ,s) is depicted in corresponding figures. For LV‘14 quasi-geoid model the standard deviation of discrepancies is 3.2 cm, 75% of discrepancies x ≤ 3.2 cm. For LV98 quasigeoid model the standard deviation of discrepancies is 4.7 cm, 80% of discrepancies x ≤ 6 cm. Without doubt, the newly developed LV‘14 quasi-geoid model is of higher quality.https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/GAC/article/view/2502quasi-geoid determinationEVRF2007LV’14LV98GPS/levelling network densificationETRS89
spellingShingle Janis Balodis
Katerina Morozova
Gunars Silabriedis
Maris Kalinka
Kriss Balodis
Ingus Mitrofanovs
Irina Baltmane
Izolde Jumare
Changing the national height system and GEOID model in Latvia
Geodesy and Cartography
quasi-geoid determination
EVRF2007
LV’14
LV98
GPS/levelling network densification
ETRS89
title Changing the national height system and GEOID model in Latvia
title_full Changing the national height system and GEOID model in Latvia
title_fullStr Changing the national height system and GEOID model in Latvia
title_full_unstemmed Changing the national height system and GEOID model in Latvia
title_short Changing the national height system and GEOID model in Latvia
title_sort changing the national height system and geoid model in latvia
topic quasi-geoid determination
EVRF2007
LV’14
LV98
GPS/levelling network densification
ETRS89
url https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/GAC/article/view/2502
work_keys_str_mv AT janisbalodis changingthenationalheightsystemandgeoidmodelinlatvia
AT katerinamorozova changingthenationalheightsystemandgeoidmodelinlatvia
AT gunarssilabriedis changingthenationalheightsystemandgeoidmodelinlatvia
AT mariskalinka changingthenationalheightsystemandgeoidmodelinlatvia
AT krissbalodis changingthenationalheightsystemandgeoidmodelinlatvia
AT ingusmitrofanovs changingthenationalheightsystemandgeoidmodelinlatvia
AT irinabaltmane changingthenationalheightsystemandgeoidmodelinlatvia
AT izoldejumare changingthenationalheightsystemandgeoidmodelinlatvia