Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?

When evaluating a charity by itself, people tend to overweight overhead costs in relation to cost-effectiveness. However, when evaluating charities side by side, they base their donations on cost-effectiveness. I conducted a replication and extension of Caviola et al. (2014; Study 1) using a 3 (High...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Glen William Spiteri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2022-03-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500009128/type/journal_article
_version_ 1797696021805924352
author Glen William Spiteri
author_facet Glen William Spiteri
author_sort Glen William Spiteri
collection DOAJ
description When evaluating a charity by itself, people tend to overweight overhead costs in relation to cost-effectiveness. However, when evaluating charities side by side, they base their donations on cost-effectiveness. I conducted a replication and extension of Caviola et al. (2014; Study 1) using a 3 (High Overhead/Effectiveness, Low Overhead/Effectiveness, Both) x 2 (Humans, Animals) between-subjects design. I found that the overhead ratio is an easier attribute to evaluate than cost-effectiveness in separate evaluation, and, in joint evaluation, people allocate donations based on cost-effectiveness. This effect was observed for human charities, and to a lesser extent, for animal charities.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:20:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e1391441d4f7478eac6f163b5e1e2aa9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:20:34Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-e1391441d4f7478eac6f163b5e1e2aa92023-09-03T14:02:50ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752022-03-011731533010.1017/S1930297500009128Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?Glen William Spiteri0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1337-2888Department of Psychological and Behavioural Sciences, London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Economics, University of Malta Department of Business, Entrepreneurship and Finance, Saint Martin’s Institute of Higher EducationWhen evaluating a charity by itself, people tend to overweight overhead costs in relation to cost-effectiveness. However, when evaluating charities side by side, they base their donations on cost-effectiveness. I conducted a replication and extension of Caviola et al. (2014; Study 1) using a 3 (High Overhead/Effectiveness, Low Overhead/Effectiveness, Both) x 2 (Humans, Animals) between-subjects design. I found that the overhead ratio is an easier attribute to evaluate than cost-effectiveness in separate evaluation, and, in joint evaluation, people allocate donations based on cost-effectiveness. This effect was observed for human charities, and to a lesser extent, for animal charities.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500009128/type/journal_articleanimal charityevaluability biasoverhead aversioncost-effectivenesspreference reversalpre-registrationaltruism
spellingShingle Glen William Spiteri
Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
Judgment and Decision Making
animal charity
evaluability bias
overhead aversion
cost-effectiveness
preference reversal
pre-registration
altruism
title Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
title_full Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
title_fullStr Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
title_full_unstemmed Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
title_short Does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities?
title_sort does the evaluability bias hold when giving to animal charities
topic animal charity
evaluability bias
overhead aversion
cost-effectiveness
preference reversal
pre-registration
altruism
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500009128/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT glenwilliamspiteri doestheevaluabilitybiasholdwhengivingtoanimalcharities