Pearl S. Buck in Literary History

This essay addresses the shifts in Pearl S. Buck’s literary reputation making the case for renewed consideration to Buck as a relevant figure for a transnational literary history. Her work is analyzed as an example of world literary study based on syncretic figures like Buck who cannot be easily ext...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stephen Rachman
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature 2017-06-01
Series:Литература двух Америк
Subjects:
Online Access:http://litda.ru/images/2017-2/LDA-2017-2_8-42_Rachman.pdf
_version_ 1819320344365760512
author Stephen Rachman
author_facet Stephen Rachman
author_sort Stephen Rachman
collection DOAJ
description This essay addresses the shifts in Pearl S. Buck’s literary reputation making the case for renewed consideration to Buck as a relevant figure for a transnational literary history. Her work is analyzed as an example of world literary study based on syncretic figures like Buck who cannot be easily extricated from one or another national tradition — conjoined literary figures, we might say, of Chinese and American literary history. By paying closer attention to figures such as Buck whose literary history forces us to consider her works in multi-lingual, multinational contexts the complex interactions of global literary systems can be made visible. In reworking this picture of global literary culture, this essay argues that Buck's literary/cultural importance was never exclusively textual (based on the intrinsic literary qualities of her works in a critical vacuum). Rather, it demands historicist and biographical contextualization in order to elucidate the ideological horizons, as Frederic Jameson might put it, intrinsic to her work. In particular, the transcultural feminism emergent in her work derives from a creative tension forged by her troubled marriage to Lossing Buck in the 1920s and 30s. What follows then, is an exploration of this in three sections. The first part will take a macroscopic vantage, tracing the rise and fall and re-emergence of Buck’s literary reputation. The second part is microscopic, detailing the formative tensions of Buck’s creative life and how those tensions fed into the formation of her literary and cultural identities, especially The Good Earth and All Men Are Brothers. The paper ends with brief discussion of Dragon Seed, and what in my view is the endpoint of Buck’s transcultural political imaginary.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T11:18:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e13d4024387d481bbbce6db1c4bbaacf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2541-7894
2542-243X
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-24T11:18:05Z
publishDate 2017-06-01
publisher Russian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World Literature
record_format Article
series Литература двух Америк
spelling doaj.art-e13d4024387d481bbbce6db1c4bbaacf2022-12-21T16:58:20ZdeuRussian Academy of Sciences, A.M. Gorky Institute of World LiteratureЛитература двух Америк2541-78942542-243X2017-06-01284210.22455/2541-7894-2017-2-8-42Pearl S. Buck in Literary HistoryStephen Rachman0Michigan State UniversityThis essay addresses the shifts in Pearl S. Buck’s literary reputation making the case for renewed consideration to Buck as a relevant figure for a transnational literary history. Her work is analyzed as an example of world literary study based on syncretic figures like Buck who cannot be easily extricated from one or another national tradition — conjoined literary figures, we might say, of Chinese and American literary history. By paying closer attention to figures such as Buck whose literary history forces us to consider her works in multi-lingual, multinational contexts the complex interactions of global literary systems can be made visible. In reworking this picture of global literary culture, this essay argues that Buck's literary/cultural importance was never exclusively textual (based on the intrinsic literary qualities of her works in a critical vacuum). Rather, it demands historicist and biographical contextualization in order to elucidate the ideological horizons, as Frederic Jameson might put it, intrinsic to her work. In particular, the transcultural feminism emergent in her work derives from a creative tension forged by her troubled marriage to Lossing Buck in the 1920s and 30s. What follows then, is an exploration of this in three sections. The first part will take a macroscopic vantage, tracing the rise and fall and re-emergence of Buck’s literary reputation. The second part is microscopic, detailing the formative tensions of Buck’s creative life and how those tensions fed into the formation of her literary and cultural identities, especially The Good Earth and All Men Are Brothers. The paper ends with brief discussion of Dragon Seed, and what in my view is the endpoint of Buck’s transcultural political imaginary.http://litda.ru/images/2017-2/LDA-2017-2_8-42_Rachman.pdfpearl sydenstricker buckliterary historychinaunited statesthe good earthall men are brothersdragon seedeast windwest windgender rolesnobel prize
spellingShingle Stephen Rachman
Pearl S. Buck in Literary History
Литература двух Америк
pearl sydenstricker buck
literary history
china
united states
the good earth
all men are brothers
dragon seed
east wind
west wind
gender roles
nobel prize
title Pearl S. Buck in Literary History
title_full Pearl S. Buck in Literary History
title_fullStr Pearl S. Buck in Literary History
title_full_unstemmed Pearl S. Buck in Literary History
title_short Pearl S. Buck in Literary History
title_sort pearl s buck in literary history
topic pearl sydenstricker buck
literary history
china
united states
the good earth
all men are brothers
dragon seed
east wind
west wind
gender roles
nobel prize
url http://litda.ru/images/2017-2/LDA-2017-2_8-42_Rachman.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenrachman pearlsbuckinliteraryhistory