Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely
In a recent review essay concerning open access (VALSINER, 2006), readers are confronted with some claims about the shifting of publication costs from the producer to the user without actually facilitating access to the products of scientific research. In the absence of concrete cases and case studi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
FQS
2006-03-01
|
Series: | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/117 |
_version_ | 1811258020871536640 |
---|---|
author | Wolff-Michael Roth |
author_facet | Wolff-Michael Roth |
author_sort | Wolff-Michael Roth |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In a recent review essay concerning open access (VALSINER, 2006), readers are confronted with some claims about the shifting of publication costs from the producer to the user without actually facilitating access to the products of scientific research. In the absence of concrete cases and case studies to substantiate the claims, I felt that the comments in their abstractness, while I sympathize with them, do not sufficiently advance our understanding of the issues involved in the open-access phenomenon. I am calling for a more differentiated, concrete method of dealing with open access and especially with the question of who is bearing the costs involved in publishing research results. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602291 |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:06:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e13fec06fbf14d08ae5b11ac990bca89 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1438-5627 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T18:06:43Z |
publishDate | 2006-03-01 |
publisher | FQS |
record_format | Article |
series | Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
spelling | doaj.art-e13fec06fbf14d08ae5b11ac990bca892022-12-22T03:21:58ZdeuFQSForum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272006-03-0172116Comment: Thinking About Open Access—ConcretelyWolff-Michael Roth0University of VictoriaIn a recent review essay concerning open access (VALSINER, 2006), readers are confronted with some claims about the shifting of publication costs from the producer to the user without actually facilitating access to the products of scientific research. In the absence of concrete cases and case studies to substantiate the claims, I felt that the comments in their abstractness, while I sympathize with them, do not sufficiently advance our understanding of the issues involved in the open-access phenomenon. I am calling for a more differentiated, concrete method of dealing with open access and especially with the question of who is bearing the costs involved in publishing research results. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602291http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/117academic publishingactivity theoryopen access publishingcultural-historical analysis |
spellingShingle | Wolff-Michael Roth Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely Forum: Qualitative Social Research academic publishing activity theory open access publishing cultural-historical analysis |
title | Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely |
title_full | Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely |
title_fullStr | Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely |
title_full_unstemmed | Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely |
title_short | Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely |
title_sort | comment thinking about open access concretely |
topic | academic publishing activity theory open access publishing cultural-historical analysis |
url | http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/117 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolffmichaelroth commentthinkingaboutopenaccessconcretely |