Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely

In a recent review essay concerning open access (VALSINER, 2006), readers are confronted with some claims about the shifting of publication costs from the producer to the user without actually facilitating access to the products of scientific research. In the absence of concrete cases and case studi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wolff-Michael Roth
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2006-03-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/117
_version_ 1811258020871536640
author Wolff-Michael Roth
author_facet Wolff-Michael Roth
author_sort Wolff-Michael Roth
collection DOAJ
description In a recent review essay concerning open access (VALSINER, 2006), readers are confronted with some claims about the shifting of publication costs from the producer to the user without actually facilitating access to the products of scientific research. In the absence of concrete cases and case studies to substantiate the claims, I felt that the comments in their abstractness, while I sympathize with them, do not sufficiently advance our understanding of the issues involved in the open-access phenomenon. I am calling for a more differentiated, concrete method of dealing with open access and especially with the question of who is bearing the costs involved in publishing research results. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602291
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:06:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e13fec06fbf14d08ae5b11ac990bca89
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1438-5627
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:06:43Z
publishDate 2006-03-01
publisher FQS
record_format Article
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
spelling doaj.art-e13fec06fbf14d08ae5b11ac990bca892022-12-22T03:21:58ZdeuFQSForum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272006-03-0172116Comment: Thinking About Open Access—ConcretelyWolff-Michael Roth0University of VictoriaIn a recent review essay concerning open access (VALSINER, 2006), readers are confronted with some claims about the shifting of publication costs from the producer to the user without actually facilitating access to the products of scientific research. In the absence of concrete cases and case studies to substantiate the claims, I felt that the comments in their abstractness, while I sympathize with them, do not sufficiently advance our understanding of the issues involved in the open-access phenomenon. I am calling for a more differentiated, concrete method of dealing with open access and especially with the question of who is bearing the costs involved in publishing research results. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602291http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/117academic publishingactivity theoryopen access publishingcultural-historical analysis
spellingShingle Wolff-Michael Roth
Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
academic publishing
activity theory
open access publishing
cultural-historical analysis
title Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely
title_full Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely
title_fullStr Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely
title_full_unstemmed Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely
title_short Comment: Thinking About Open Access—Concretely
title_sort comment thinking about open access concretely
topic academic publishing
activity theory
open access publishing
cultural-historical analysis
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/117
work_keys_str_mv AT wolffmichaelroth commentthinkingaboutopenaccessconcretely