A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of Behavioural Tests Used to Assess Behavioural Characteristics Important in Working Dogs

BackgroundWorking dogs are selected based on predictions from tests that they will be able to perform specific tasks in often challenging environments. However, withdrawal from service in working dogs is still a big problem, bringing into question the reliability of the selection tests used to make...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karen Brady, Nina Cracknell, Helen Zulch, Daniel Simon Mills
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2018.00103/full
_version_ 1811269959066583040
author Karen Brady
Nina Cracknell
Helen Zulch
Daniel Simon Mills
author_facet Karen Brady
Nina Cracknell
Helen Zulch
Daniel Simon Mills
author_sort Karen Brady
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundWorking dogs are selected based on predictions from tests that they will be able to perform specific tasks in often challenging environments. However, withdrawal from service in working dogs is still a big problem, bringing into question the reliability of the selection tests used to make these predictions.MethodsA systematic review was undertaken aimed at bringing together available information on the reliability and predictive validity of the assessment of behavioural characteristics used with working dogs to establish the quality of selection tests currently available for use to predict success in working dogs.ResultsThe search procedures resulted in 16 papers meeting the criteria for inclusion. A large range of behaviour tests and parameters were used in the identified papers, and so behaviour tests and their underpinning constructs were grouped on the basis of their relationship with positive core affect (willingness to work, human-directed social behaviour, object-directed play tendencies) and negative core affect (human-directed aggression, approach withdrawal tendencies, sensitivity to aversives). We then examined the papers for reports of inter-rater reliability, within-session intra-rater reliability, test-retest validity and predictive validity.ConclusionsThe review revealed a widespread lack of information relating to the reliability and validity of measures to assess behaviour and inconsistencies in terminologies, study parameters and indices of success. There is a need to standardise the reporting of these aspects of behavioural tests in order to improve the knowledge base of what characteristics are predictive of optimal performance in working dog roles, improving selection processes and reducing working dog redundancy. We suggest the use of a framework based on explaining the direct or indirect relationship of the test with core affect.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T21:52:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e14b92f75e084508aac08653b3cface5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-1769
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T21:52:25Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj.art-e14b92f75e084508aac08653b3cface52022-12-22T03:15:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692018-05-01510.3389/fvets.2018.00103363664A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of Behavioural Tests Used to Assess Behavioural Characteristics Important in Working DogsKaren BradyNina CracknellHelen ZulchDaniel Simon MillsBackgroundWorking dogs are selected based on predictions from tests that they will be able to perform specific tasks in often challenging environments. However, withdrawal from service in working dogs is still a big problem, bringing into question the reliability of the selection tests used to make these predictions.MethodsA systematic review was undertaken aimed at bringing together available information on the reliability and predictive validity of the assessment of behavioural characteristics used with working dogs to establish the quality of selection tests currently available for use to predict success in working dogs.ResultsThe search procedures resulted in 16 papers meeting the criteria for inclusion. A large range of behaviour tests and parameters were used in the identified papers, and so behaviour tests and their underpinning constructs were grouped on the basis of their relationship with positive core affect (willingness to work, human-directed social behaviour, object-directed play tendencies) and negative core affect (human-directed aggression, approach withdrawal tendencies, sensitivity to aversives). We then examined the papers for reports of inter-rater reliability, within-session intra-rater reliability, test-retest validity and predictive validity.ConclusionsThe review revealed a widespread lack of information relating to the reliability and validity of measures to assess behaviour and inconsistencies in terminologies, study parameters and indices of success. There is a need to standardise the reporting of these aspects of behavioural tests in order to improve the knowledge base of what characteristics are predictive of optimal performance in working dog roles, improving selection processes and reducing working dog redundancy. We suggest the use of a framework based on explaining the direct or indirect relationship of the test with core affect.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2018.00103/fullaffectbehavioural testsdogsemotionpersonalityreliability
spellingShingle Karen Brady
Nina Cracknell
Helen Zulch
Daniel Simon Mills
A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of Behavioural Tests Used to Assess Behavioural Characteristics Important in Working Dogs
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
affect
behavioural tests
dogs
emotion
personality
reliability
title A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of Behavioural Tests Used to Assess Behavioural Characteristics Important in Working Dogs
title_full A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of Behavioural Tests Used to Assess Behavioural Characteristics Important in Working Dogs
title_fullStr A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of Behavioural Tests Used to Assess Behavioural Characteristics Important in Working Dogs
title_full_unstemmed A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of Behavioural Tests Used to Assess Behavioural Characteristics Important in Working Dogs
title_short A Systematic Review of the Reliability and Validity of Behavioural Tests Used to Assess Behavioural Characteristics Important in Working Dogs
title_sort systematic review of the reliability and validity of behavioural tests used to assess behavioural characteristics important in working dogs
topic affect
behavioural tests
dogs
emotion
personality
reliability
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fvets.2018.00103/full
work_keys_str_mv AT karenbrady asystematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofbehaviouraltestsusedtoassessbehaviouralcharacteristicsimportantinworkingdogs
AT ninacracknell asystematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofbehaviouraltestsusedtoassessbehaviouralcharacteristicsimportantinworkingdogs
AT helenzulch asystematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofbehaviouraltestsusedtoassessbehaviouralcharacteristicsimportantinworkingdogs
AT danielsimonmills asystematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofbehaviouraltestsusedtoassessbehaviouralcharacteristicsimportantinworkingdogs
AT karenbrady systematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofbehaviouraltestsusedtoassessbehaviouralcharacteristicsimportantinworkingdogs
AT ninacracknell systematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofbehaviouraltestsusedtoassessbehaviouralcharacteristicsimportantinworkingdogs
AT helenzulch systematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofbehaviouraltestsusedtoassessbehaviouralcharacteristicsimportantinworkingdogs
AT danielsimonmills systematicreviewofthereliabilityandvalidityofbehaviouraltestsusedtoassessbehaviouralcharacteristicsimportantinworkingdogs