Development of a decision-support tool to quantify authorship contributions in clinical trial publications
Purpose This study aimed to develop a decision-support tool to quantitatively determine authorship in clinical trial publications. Methods The tool was developed in three phases: consolidation of authorship recommendations from the Good Publication Practice (GPP) and International Committee of Medic...
Main Authors: | Sam T. Mathew, Habeeb Ibrahim Abdul Razack, Prasanth Viswanathan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Council of Science Editors
2022-02-01
|
Series: | Science Editing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.escienceediting.org/upload/kcse-259.pdf |
Similar Items
-
No room for ambiguity: The concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications
by: Mohammad Javed Ali
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Authorship Disputes in Scholarly Biomedical Publications and Trust in the Research Institution
by: Itamar Ashkenazi, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Editors-in-chief perceptions of patients as (co) authors on publications and the acceptability of ICMJE authorship criteria: a cross-sectional survey
by: Kelly D. Cobey, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Authorship criteria and sequence
by: Md Sharfuddin Ahmed, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Equal authorship for equal authors: personal experience as an equal author in twenty peer-reviewed medical publications during the last three years
by: Mitchell S. Cappell
Published: (2017-01-01)