Lady Clara Cavendish: Reynolds and Rymer’s Political Hoax

In 1858, G. W. M. Reynolds’s (1814–79) popular penny periodical Reynolds’s Miscellany introduced a new ‘authoress’, Lady Clara Cavendish. Reynolds bragged that Cavendish’s novels would reveal Hanoverian court corruption—for a great price, which he happily paid. However, as some Victorian critics spe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rebecca L. Nesvet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée 2022-03-01
Series:Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/cve/10742
_version_ 1811234065011965952
author Rebecca L. Nesvet
author_facet Rebecca L. Nesvet
author_sort Rebecca L. Nesvet
collection DOAJ
description In 1858, G. W. M. Reynolds’s (1814–79) popular penny periodical Reynolds’s Miscellany introduced a new ‘authoress’, Lady Clara Cavendish. Reynolds bragged that Cavendish’s novels would reveal Hanoverian court corruption—for a great price, which he happily paid. However, as some Victorian critics speculated, Cavendish was herself a fiction. She and her novels are in fact the inventions of Reynolds and his regular employee James Malcolm Rymer (1814–84), who in the 1840s created ‘Sweeney Todd’ and ‘Varney, the Vampire’ for the penny blood publisher Edward Lloyd. This essay contends that Reynolds and Rymer’s Cavendish is not a random collection of pieces united merely by a byline. Instead, Cavendish’s supposed productions combine with paratextual material such as Reynolds’s advertising to articulate a consistent personality. Reading the Cavendish phenomenon as a holistic literary corpus reveals that in creating it, Reynolds and Rymer advance a didactic and political mission. In keeping with their involvement in Chartism, the Cavendish hoax enlists the rhetoric of ‘Old Corruption’ to support Chartist ideals, especially the political awakening of the ‘industrious millions’. By presenting Cavendish as an aristocrat and court insider, Reynolds and Rymer invest their political critique with authority they could not otherwise have achieved. For Reynolds and Rymer, therefore, the hoax did not constitute a departure or escapist fantasy, but a potentially more persuasive affirmation of the ideological commitments that they shared. Reading it today throws into bold relief those shared perspectives, which critics are only beginning to recover and re-appraise.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T11:30:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e16385ee2d6045bb97dec74af289f18e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0220-5610
2271-6149
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T11:30:20Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Presses Universitaires de la Méditerranée
record_format Article
series Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
spelling doaj.art-e16385ee2d6045bb97dec74af289f18e2022-12-22T03:35:02ZengPresses Universitaires de la MéditerranéeCahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens0220-56102271-61492022-03-019510.4000/cve.10742Lady Clara Cavendish: Reynolds and Rymer’s Political HoaxRebecca L. NesvetIn 1858, G. W. M. Reynolds’s (1814–79) popular penny periodical Reynolds’s Miscellany introduced a new ‘authoress’, Lady Clara Cavendish. Reynolds bragged that Cavendish’s novels would reveal Hanoverian court corruption—for a great price, which he happily paid. However, as some Victorian critics speculated, Cavendish was herself a fiction. She and her novels are in fact the inventions of Reynolds and his regular employee James Malcolm Rymer (1814–84), who in the 1840s created ‘Sweeney Todd’ and ‘Varney, the Vampire’ for the penny blood publisher Edward Lloyd. This essay contends that Reynolds and Rymer’s Cavendish is not a random collection of pieces united merely by a byline. Instead, Cavendish’s supposed productions combine with paratextual material such as Reynolds’s advertising to articulate a consistent personality. Reading the Cavendish phenomenon as a holistic literary corpus reveals that in creating it, Reynolds and Rymer advance a didactic and political mission. In keeping with their involvement in Chartism, the Cavendish hoax enlists the rhetoric of ‘Old Corruption’ to support Chartist ideals, especially the political awakening of the ‘industrious millions’. By presenting Cavendish as an aristocrat and court insider, Reynolds and Rymer invest their political critique with authority they could not otherwise have achieved. For Reynolds and Rymer, therefore, the hoax did not constitute a departure or escapist fantasy, but a potentially more persuasive affirmation of the ideological commitments that they shared. Reading it today throws into bold relief those shared perspectives, which critics are only beginning to recover and re-appraise.http://journals.openedition.org/cve/10742Lady Clara CavendishReynolds (George W. M.)hoaxVictorian periodicalstransatlanticRymer (James Malcolm)
spellingShingle Rebecca L. Nesvet
Lady Clara Cavendish: Reynolds and Rymer’s Political Hoax
Cahiers Victoriens et Edouardiens
Lady Clara Cavendish
Reynolds (George W. M.)
hoax
Victorian periodicals
transatlantic
Rymer (James Malcolm)
title Lady Clara Cavendish: Reynolds and Rymer’s Political Hoax
title_full Lady Clara Cavendish: Reynolds and Rymer’s Political Hoax
title_fullStr Lady Clara Cavendish: Reynolds and Rymer’s Political Hoax
title_full_unstemmed Lady Clara Cavendish: Reynolds and Rymer’s Political Hoax
title_short Lady Clara Cavendish: Reynolds and Rymer’s Political Hoax
title_sort lady clara cavendish reynolds and rymer s political hoax
topic Lady Clara Cavendish
Reynolds (George W. M.)
hoax
Victorian periodicals
transatlantic
Rymer (James Malcolm)
url http://journals.openedition.org/cve/10742
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccalnesvet ladyclaracavendishreynoldsandrymerspoliticalhoax