Evaluation of eight commercial dog diets

Estimation of the quality of commercial diets is a topic of interest for the majority of dog owners. Recently, in a French consumer association magazine, an evaluation of eight dog commercial dry diets (from super-premium, basic-nutrition, private-label and economy brands) according to several nutri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline Daumas, Bernard-Marie Paragon, Chantal Thorin, Lucile Martin, Henri Dumon, Samuel Ninet, Patrick Nguyen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Nutritional Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2048679014000652/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156022496067584
author Caroline Daumas
Bernard-Marie Paragon
Chantal Thorin
Lucile Martin
Henri Dumon
Samuel Ninet
Patrick Nguyen
author_facet Caroline Daumas
Bernard-Marie Paragon
Chantal Thorin
Lucile Martin
Henri Dumon
Samuel Ninet
Patrick Nguyen
author_sort Caroline Daumas
collection DOAJ
description Estimation of the quality of commercial diets is a topic of interest for the majority of dog owners. Recently, in a French consumer association magazine, an evaluation of eight dog commercial dry diets (from super-premium, basic-nutrition, private-label and economy brands) according to several nutritional criteria was published. The aims of the study were: (1) to evaluate the apparent digestibility of these diets; (2) to score these diets according to digestibility results; and (3) to compare these data with the scoring of the magazine. Six adult Beagle dogs were enrolled for the digestibility trials. Diets were scored according to energy, crude protein and crude fat (CF) apparent digestibility coefficients, digestible protein-to-energy ratios and ash content. Each of the five criteria was scored from 4 to 20 points. The ranges of crude protein, CF, crude fibre and ash content were 20·9–30·6 %, 6·8–19·7 %, 2·2–3·3 % and 4·6–9·7 % on a DM basis, respectively. The ranges of energy, crude protein and CF apparent digestibility coefficients were 72·6–87·7 %, 70·4–82·5 % and 76·1–95·4 %, respectively. The range of the protein-to-energy ratio was 10–14 digestible crude protein per MJ metabolisable energy. Little overlap in the scoring systems was found, but the private-label brand and economy brand diets presented the lowest scores in the two systems. These results showed that the evaluation of commercial diets should take into account multiple nutritional aspects. In particular, analytical and biological (digestibility) criteria should be considered as complementary in the evaluation of dry dog commercial diets.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:44:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e179132ab1c5417d8a08f8acf32cabe6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2048-6790
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:44:30Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Nutritional Science
spelling doaj.art-e179132ab1c5417d8a08f8acf32cabe62023-03-09T12:38:43ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Nutritional Science2048-67902014-01-01310.1017/jns.2014.65Evaluation of eight commercial dog dietsCaroline Daumas0Bernard-Marie Paragon1Chantal Thorin2Lucile Martin3Henri Dumon4Samuel Ninet5Patrick Nguyen6Nutrition and Endocrinology Unit, ONIRIS, National College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science, and Engineering, Nantes, FranceDepartment of Nutrition, National Veterinary School of Alfort, FranceNutrition and Endocrinology Unit, ONIRIS, National College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science, and Engineering, Nantes, FranceNutrition and Endocrinology Unit, ONIRIS, National College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science, and Engineering, Nantes, FranceNutrition and Endocrinology Unit, ONIRIS, National College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science, and Engineering, Nantes, FranceNutrition and Endocrinology Unit, ONIRIS, National College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science, and Engineering, Nantes, FranceNutrition and Endocrinology Unit, ONIRIS, National College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science, and Engineering, Nantes, FranceEstimation of the quality of commercial diets is a topic of interest for the majority of dog owners. Recently, in a French consumer association magazine, an evaluation of eight dog commercial dry diets (from super-premium, basic-nutrition, private-label and economy brands) according to several nutritional criteria was published. The aims of the study were: (1) to evaluate the apparent digestibility of these diets; (2) to score these diets according to digestibility results; and (3) to compare these data with the scoring of the magazine. Six adult Beagle dogs were enrolled for the digestibility trials. Diets were scored according to energy, crude protein and crude fat (CF) apparent digestibility coefficients, digestible protein-to-energy ratios and ash content. Each of the five criteria was scored from 4 to 20 points. The ranges of crude protein, CF, crude fibre and ash content were 20·9–30·6 %, 6·8–19·7 %, 2·2–3·3 % and 4·6–9·7 % on a DM basis, respectively. The ranges of energy, crude protein and CF apparent digestibility coefficients were 72·6–87·7 %, 70·4–82·5 % and 76·1–95·4 %, respectively. The range of the protein-to-energy ratio was 10–14 digestible crude protein per MJ metabolisable energy. Little overlap in the scoring systems was found, but the private-label brand and economy brand diets presented the lowest scores in the two systems. These results showed that the evaluation of commercial diets should take into account multiple nutritional aspects. In particular, analytical and biological (digestibility) criteria should be considered as complementary in the evaluation of dry dog commercial diets.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2048679014000652/type/journal_articleCommercial dry dog dietsDigestibility
spellingShingle Caroline Daumas
Bernard-Marie Paragon
Chantal Thorin
Lucile Martin
Henri Dumon
Samuel Ninet
Patrick Nguyen
Evaluation of eight commercial dog diets
Journal of Nutritional Science
Commercial dry dog diets
Digestibility
title Evaluation of eight commercial dog diets
title_full Evaluation of eight commercial dog diets
title_fullStr Evaluation of eight commercial dog diets
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of eight commercial dog diets
title_short Evaluation of eight commercial dog diets
title_sort evaluation of eight commercial dog diets
topic Commercial dry dog diets
Digestibility
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2048679014000652/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinedaumas evaluationofeightcommercialdogdiets
AT bernardmarieparagon evaluationofeightcommercialdogdiets
AT chantalthorin evaluationofeightcommercialdogdiets
AT lucilemartin evaluationofeightcommercialdogdiets
AT henridumon evaluationofeightcommercialdogdiets
AT samuelninet evaluationofeightcommercialdogdiets
AT patricknguyen evaluationofeightcommercialdogdiets