Heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animals

Cortical inactivation represents a key causal manipulation allowing the study of cortical circuits and their impact on behavior. A key assumption in inactivation studies is that the neurons in the target area become silent while the surrounding cortical tissue is only negligibly impacted. However, i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ariana R Andrei, Samantha Debes, Mircea Chelaru, Xiaoqin Liu, Elsa Rodarte, John L Spudich, Roger Janz, Valentin Dragoi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2021-09-01
Series:eLife
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elifesciences.org/articles/66400
_version_ 1811227380075724800
author Ariana R Andrei
Samantha Debes
Mircea Chelaru
Xiaoqin Liu
Elsa Rodarte
John L Spudich
Roger Janz
Valentin Dragoi
author_facet Ariana R Andrei
Samantha Debes
Mircea Chelaru
Xiaoqin Liu
Elsa Rodarte
John L Spudich
Roger Janz
Valentin Dragoi
author_sort Ariana R Andrei
collection DOAJ
description Cortical inactivation represents a key causal manipulation allowing the study of cortical circuits and their impact on behavior. A key assumption in inactivation studies is that the neurons in the target area become silent while the surrounding cortical tissue is only negligibly impacted. However, individual neurons are embedded in complex local circuits composed of excitatory and inhibitory cells with connections extending hundreds of microns. This raises the possibility that silencing one part of the network could induce complex, unpredictable activity changes in neurons outside the targeted inactivation zone. These off-target side effects can potentially complicate interpretations of inactivation manipulations, especially when they are related to changes in behavior. Here, we demonstrate that optogenetic inactivation of glutamatergic neurons in the superficial layers of monkey primary visual cortex (V1) induces robust suppression at the light-targeted site, but destabilizes stimulus responses in the neighboring, untargeted network. We identified four types of stimulus-evoked neuronal responses within a cortical column, ranging from full suppression to facilitation, and a mixture of both. Mixed responses were most prominent in middle and deep cortical layers. These results demonstrate that response modulation driven by lateral network connectivity is diversely implemented throughout a cortical column. Importantly, consistent behavioral changes induced by optogenetic inactivation were only achieved when cumulative network activity was homogeneously suppressed. Therefore, careful consideration of the full range of network changes outside the inactivated cortical region is required, as heterogeneous side effects can confound interpretation of inactivation experiments.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:41:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e181f1fee54c4be49d02779e63fda9c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2050-084X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:41:35Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
record_format Article
series eLife
spelling doaj.art-e181f1fee54c4be49d02779e63fda9c52022-12-22T03:38:04ZengeLife Sciences Publications LtdeLife2050-084X2021-09-011010.7554/eLife.66400Heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animalsAriana R Andrei0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-2580Samantha Debes1Mircea Chelaru2Xiaoqin Liu3Elsa Rodarte4John L Spudich5https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4167-8590Roger Janz6Valentin Dragoi7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-0926Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, United StatesDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, United StatesDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, United StatesDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, United StatesCenter for Membrane Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, United StatesDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, United StatesDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, United StatesCortical inactivation represents a key causal manipulation allowing the study of cortical circuits and their impact on behavior. A key assumption in inactivation studies is that the neurons in the target area become silent while the surrounding cortical tissue is only negligibly impacted. However, individual neurons are embedded in complex local circuits composed of excitatory and inhibitory cells with connections extending hundreds of microns. This raises the possibility that silencing one part of the network could induce complex, unpredictable activity changes in neurons outside the targeted inactivation zone. These off-target side effects can potentially complicate interpretations of inactivation manipulations, especially when they are related to changes in behavior. Here, we demonstrate that optogenetic inactivation of glutamatergic neurons in the superficial layers of monkey primary visual cortex (V1) induces robust suppression at the light-targeted site, but destabilizes stimulus responses in the neighboring, untargeted network. We identified four types of stimulus-evoked neuronal responses within a cortical column, ranging from full suppression to facilitation, and a mixture of both. Mixed responses were most prominent in middle and deep cortical layers. These results demonstrate that response modulation driven by lateral network connectivity is diversely implemented throughout a cortical column. Importantly, consistent behavioral changes induced by optogenetic inactivation were only achieved when cumulative network activity was homogeneously suppressed. Therefore, careful consideration of the full range of network changes outside the inactivated cortical region is required, as heterogeneous side effects can confound interpretation of inactivation experiments.https://elifesciences.org/articles/66400visual cortexoptogeneticscomputationmonkeyelectrophysiologybehavior
spellingShingle Ariana R Andrei
Samantha Debes
Mircea Chelaru
Xiaoqin Liu
Elsa Rodarte
John L Spudich
Roger Janz
Valentin Dragoi
Heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animals
eLife
visual cortex
optogenetics
computation
monkey
electrophysiology
behavior
title Heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animals
title_full Heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animals
title_fullStr Heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animals
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animals
title_short Heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animals
title_sort heterogeneous side effects of cortical inactivation in behaving animals
topic visual cortex
optogenetics
computation
monkey
electrophysiology
behavior
url https://elifesciences.org/articles/66400
work_keys_str_mv AT arianarandrei heterogeneoussideeffectsofcorticalinactivationinbehavinganimals
AT samanthadebes heterogeneoussideeffectsofcorticalinactivationinbehavinganimals
AT mirceachelaru heterogeneoussideeffectsofcorticalinactivationinbehavinganimals
AT xiaoqinliu heterogeneoussideeffectsofcorticalinactivationinbehavinganimals
AT elsarodarte heterogeneoussideeffectsofcorticalinactivationinbehavinganimals
AT johnlspudich heterogeneoussideeffectsofcorticalinactivationinbehavinganimals
AT rogerjanz heterogeneoussideeffectsofcorticalinactivationinbehavinganimals
AT valentindragoi heterogeneoussideeffectsofcorticalinactivationinbehavinganimals