Retrospective outcome analysis of urethroplasties performed for various etiologies in a single South African center

Objectives: To compare the results of anastomotic versus augmentation urethroplasty (buccal mucosa graft (BMG) onlay), as well as dorsal versus ventral BMG techniques. Methods: A retrospective audit of 69 patients who underwent urethroplasty at Eersteriver Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A.P. van den Heever, J. Lazarus, J.H. Naudé, L. Wiechers, M. Tsheisi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2012-09-01
Series:African Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110570412000458
_version_ 1819068349027450880
author A.P. van den Heever
J. Lazarus
J.H. Naudé
L. Wiechers
M. Tsheisi
author_facet A.P. van den Heever
J. Lazarus
J.H. Naudé
L. Wiechers
M. Tsheisi
author_sort A.P. van den Heever
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To compare the results of anastomotic versus augmentation urethroplasty (buccal mucosa graft (BMG) onlay), as well as dorsal versus ventral BMG techniques. Methods: A retrospective audit of 69 patients who underwent urethroplasty at Eersteriver Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa between October 2004 and July 2011 was undertaken. Analysis included stricture etiology, location and length, type of surgery performed as well as complication rates over the follow-up period. Results: The predominant stricture etiologies were traumatic and infective causes (55%), with a mean stricture length of 3 cm (0.5–15 cm). Forty two patients had bulbar urethra strictures (61%), with 8 (11%) located in the posterior, and penile & bulbar regions, respectively. The remaining strictures were located in the penile urethra (16%). Surgery performed included bulbar (12) and membranous anastomotic (8) urethroplasty, ventral (13) and dorsal (22) buccal mucosa onlay grafts (BMG), and 2-stage urethroplasty (14). Overall stricture recurrence was seen in 9 patients (13%), including 1 patient (8%) of the anterior end-to-end anastomotic group compared to 2 patients (6%) of the onlay BMG group (p = 0.77). The re-stricture rates were 5% and 8% in the dorsal (1/22) and ventral BMG onlay groups (1/13), respectively (p = 0.72). Conclusions: Both anastomotic and BMG onlay techniques are safe and effective surgical options. Similar outcomes were demonstrated between ventral and dorsal BMG onlay groups.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T16:32:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e18e08ee45f043b795bf83862f02941a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1110-5704
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T16:32:44Z
publishDate 2012-09-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series African Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-e18e08ee45f043b795bf83862f02941a2022-12-21T18:57:19ZengSpringerOpenAfrican Journal of Urology1110-57042012-09-0118312713010.1016/j.afju.2012.03.001Retrospective outcome analysis of urethroplasties performed for various etiologies in a single South African centerA.P. van den HeeverJ. LazarusJ.H. NaudéL. WiechersM. TsheisiObjectives: To compare the results of anastomotic versus augmentation urethroplasty (buccal mucosa graft (BMG) onlay), as well as dorsal versus ventral BMG techniques. Methods: A retrospective audit of 69 patients who underwent urethroplasty at Eersteriver Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa between October 2004 and July 2011 was undertaken. Analysis included stricture etiology, location and length, type of surgery performed as well as complication rates over the follow-up period. Results: The predominant stricture etiologies were traumatic and infective causes (55%), with a mean stricture length of 3 cm (0.5–15 cm). Forty two patients had bulbar urethra strictures (61%), with 8 (11%) located in the posterior, and penile & bulbar regions, respectively. The remaining strictures were located in the penile urethra (16%). Surgery performed included bulbar (12) and membranous anastomotic (8) urethroplasty, ventral (13) and dorsal (22) buccal mucosa onlay grafts (BMG), and 2-stage urethroplasty (14). Overall stricture recurrence was seen in 9 patients (13%), including 1 patient (8%) of the anterior end-to-end anastomotic group compared to 2 patients (6%) of the onlay BMG group (p = 0.77). The re-stricture rates were 5% and 8% in the dorsal (1/22) and ventral BMG onlay groups (1/13), respectively (p = 0.72). Conclusions: Both anastomotic and BMG onlay techniques are safe and effective surgical options. Similar outcomes were demonstrated between ventral and dorsal BMG onlay groups.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110570412000458Urethral strictureUrethroplastyBuccal mucosa graft
spellingShingle A.P. van den Heever
J. Lazarus
J.H. Naudé
L. Wiechers
M. Tsheisi
Retrospective outcome analysis of urethroplasties performed for various etiologies in a single South African center
African Journal of Urology
Urethral stricture
Urethroplasty
Buccal mucosa graft
title Retrospective outcome analysis of urethroplasties performed for various etiologies in a single South African center
title_full Retrospective outcome analysis of urethroplasties performed for various etiologies in a single South African center
title_fullStr Retrospective outcome analysis of urethroplasties performed for various etiologies in a single South African center
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective outcome analysis of urethroplasties performed for various etiologies in a single South African center
title_short Retrospective outcome analysis of urethroplasties performed for various etiologies in a single South African center
title_sort retrospective outcome analysis of urethroplasties performed for various etiologies in a single south african center
topic Urethral stricture
Urethroplasty
Buccal mucosa graft
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110570412000458
work_keys_str_mv AT apvandenheever retrospectiveoutcomeanalysisofurethroplastiesperformedforvariousetiologiesinasinglesouthafricancenter
AT jlazarus retrospectiveoutcomeanalysisofurethroplastiesperformedforvariousetiologiesinasinglesouthafricancenter
AT jhnaude retrospectiveoutcomeanalysisofurethroplastiesperformedforvariousetiologiesinasinglesouthafricancenter
AT lwiechers retrospectiveoutcomeanalysisofurethroplastiesperformedforvariousetiologiesinasinglesouthafricancenter
AT mtsheisi retrospectiveoutcomeanalysisofurethroplastiesperformedforvariousetiologiesinasinglesouthafricancenter