Application of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Wellbore Stability Analysis of Directional Wells

Wellbore instability has always been one of the challenging issues in the drilling industry, and it could cause a delay in the drilling program, leading to an increase in the cost of the drilling projects. This study utilized data from seven wells to investigate and model directional wells’ stabilit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Abdideh, Mehdi Navadeh Tayyebi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Reaserch Institute of Petroleum Industry 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jpst.ripi.ir/article_1100_a56eda1d170c0726048457205e8f2a68.pdf
_version_ 1819136244883390464
author Mohammad Abdideh
Mehdi Navadeh Tayyebi
author_facet Mohammad Abdideh
Mehdi Navadeh Tayyebi
author_sort Mohammad Abdideh
collection DOAJ
description Wellbore instability has always been one of the challenging issues in the drilling industry, and it could cause a delay in the drilling program, leading to an increase in the cost of the drilling projects. This study utilized data from seven wells to investigate and model directional wells’ stability in a shale formation during drilling in one of the largest oilfields in the southwest of Iran. In this study, two mthods, i.e. (1) mechanical earth model (MEM) and (2) quantitative risk assessment (QRA) are applied to investigate and model directional wells’ stability in shale formation. Herein, a wellbore with full suite log data and compressional and shear wave slowness was selected to construct the mechanical earth model (MEM). Appropriate equations are provided to estimate the field’s static geomechanical data, and laboratory data were used for validation (i.e. core). The minimum mud weight required at azimuth and different angles of the directional well was calculated using numerical and analytical analysis of the wellbore stability using the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. The purpose of the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) phase is to investigate the impact of the uncertainty of key parameters (i.e. input variables of the minimum mud weight equation based on the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion) and their sensitivity to an increase in success rate and a decrease in failure. In the QRA phase, the Monte Carlo simulation method is used, and the results are displayed on a Tornado diagram. The results of the Hoek-Brown and Mogi-Coulomb failure criteria propose that the sensitivity of the mud density obtained by the above methods to the uncertainty is low. The results maintain that the prediction of the minimum mud weight required for the stability of the investigated wellbore is strongly dependent on changes in the maximum horizontal stress (σ_H) parameter and minimum horizontal stress. Moreover, the internal friction angle and rock adhesion coefficient have the least impact on determining the minimum mud weight needed for wellbore stabilization.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T10:31:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e18fb9e89fa4498f9c2d59c464d946fb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-659X
2645-3312
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T10:31:54Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Reaserch Institute of Petroleum Industry
record_format Article
series Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology
spelling doaj.art-e18fb9e89fa4498f9c2d59c464d946fb2022-12-21T18:29:19ZengReaserch Institute of Petroleum IndustryJournal of Petroleum Science and Technology2251-659X2645-33122020-12-011042910.22078/jpst.2020.4138.16691100Application of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Wellbore Stability Analysis of Directional WellsMohammad Abdideh0Mehdi Navadeh Tayyebi1Department of Petroleum Engineering, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Omidiyeh, IranDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Omidiyeh, IranWellbore instability has always been one of the challenging issues in the drilling industry, and it could cause a delay in the drilling program, leading to an increase in the cost of the drilling projects. This study utilized data from seven wells to investigate and model directional wells’ stability in a shale formation during drilling in one of the largest oilfields in the southwest of Iran. In this study, two mthods, i.e. (1) mechanical earth model (MEM) and (2) quantitative risk assessment (QRA) are applied to investigate and model directional wells’ stability in shale formation. Herein, a wellbore with full suite log data and compressional and shear wave slowness was selected to construct the mechanical earth model (MEM). Appropriate equations are provided to estimate the field’s static geomechanical data, and laboratory data were used for validation (i.e. core). The minimum mud weight required at azimuth and different angles of the directional well was calculated using numerical and analytical analysis of the wellbore stability using the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. The purpose of the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) phase is to investigate the impact of the uncertainty of key parameters (i.e. input variables of the minimum mud weight equation based on the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion) and their sensitivity to an increase in success rate and a decrease in failure. In the QRA phase, the Monte Carlo simulation method is used, and the results are displayed on a Tornado diagram. The results of the Hoek-Brown and Mogi-Coulomb failure criteria propose that the sensitivity of the mud density obtained by the above methods to the uncertainty is low. The results maintain that the prediction of the minimum mud weight required for the stability of the investigated wellbore is strongly dependent on changes in the maximum horizontal stress (σ_H) parameter and minimum horizontal stress. Moreover, the internal friction angle and rock adhesion coefficient have the least impact on determining the minimum mud weight needed for wellbore stabilization.https://jpst.ripi.ir/article_1100_a56eda1d170c0726048457205e8f2a68.pdfwellbore stabilitymechanical earth modelminimum and maximum horizontal stressquantitative risk assessmentmonte carlo methodtornado diagram
spellingShingle Mohammad Abdideh
Mehdi Navadeh Tayyebi
Application of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Wellbore Stability Analysis of Directional Wells
Journal of Petroleum Science and Technology
wellbore stability
mechanical earth model
minimum and maximum horizontal stress
quantitative risk assessment
monte carlo method
tornado diagram
title Application of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Wellbore Stability Analysis of Directional Wells
title_full Application of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Wellbore Stability Analysis of Directional Wells
title_fullStr Application of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Wellbore Stability Analysis of Directional Wells
title_full_unstemmed Application of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Wellbore Stability Analysis of Directional Wells
title_short Application of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Wellbore Stability Analysis of Directional Wells
title_sort application of quantitative risk assessment in wellbore stability analysis of directional wells
topic wellbore stability
mechanical earth model
minimum and maximum horizontal stress
quantitative risk assessment
monte carlo method
tornado diagram
url https://jpst.ripi.ir/article_1100_a56eda1d170c0726048457205e8f2a68.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadabdideh applicationofquantitativeriskassessmentinwellborestabilityanalysisofdirectionalwells
AT mehdinavadehtayyebi applicationofquantitativeriskassessmentinwellborestabilityanalysisofdirectionalwells