Contextual antecedents of quality improvement: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practice

Introduction The impact of contextual factors on primary health-care quality improvement is significant. In-depth research is required to identify the key contextual factors that influence quality improvement initiatives to develop high-performing primary health-care systems. Aim This research se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynn McBain, Paul Childerhouse, Jane Cullen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CSIRO Publishing 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Primary Health Care
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.publish.csiro.au/hc/pdf/HC22012
_version_ 1828161595019100160
author Lynn McBain
Paul Childerhouse
Jane Cullen
author_facet Lynn McBain
Paul Childerhouse
Jane Cullen
author_sort Lynn McBain
collection DOAJ
description Introduction The impact of contextual factors on primary health-care quality improvement is significant. In-depth research is required to identify the key contextual factors that influence quality improvement initiatives to develop high-performing primary health-care systems. Aim This research seeks to answer two questions; what are the contextual factors influencing primary care improvement initiatives?; and how do contextual factors, the quality improvement initiative and the implementation process influence one another and the overall improvement outcomes? Methods A multi-case study methodology was used to explore the complexities of the phenomena in situ. Three sites where successful quality improvement had occurred were selected by purposeful theoretical sampling to provide a sample of rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practice settings typical of the New Zealand environment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with team members and triangulated with secondary data provided by the organisations. Results The quality improvement topic and the approach taken were intrinsically linked to context. Sites reported success in achieving the desired outcomes benefitting the patients, practice and staff. Teams did not use formal improvement methods, instead relying on established relationships and elements of change management methods. The culture in all three cases was a large component of why and how these initiatives were successful. Discussion Intrinsic motivation was generated by community connections and networks. This combined with a learning climate generated by distributed leadership and teamwork enabled success. Iterative reflection and sensemaking processes were able to deliver quality improvement success in primary care without the use of formal improvement methods.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:41:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e193c4ee41c84fd78a781288d3191f02
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1172-6156
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:41:09Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher CSIRO Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Primary Health Care
spelling doaj.art-e193c4ee41c84fd78a781288d3191f022022-12-22T03:55:00ZengCSIRO PublishingJournal of Primary Health Care1172-61562022-01-01142179186HC22012Contextual antecedents of quality improvement: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practiceLynn McBain0Paul Childerhouse1Jane Cullen2Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; and Department of Supply Chain Management, College of Business and Law, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia.Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Introduction The impact of contextual factors on primary health-care quality improvement is significant. In-depth research is required to identify the key contextual factors that influence quality improvement initiatives to develop high-performing primary health-care systems. Aim This research seeks to answer two questions; what are the contextual factors influencing primary care improvement initiatives?; and how do contextual factors, the quality improvement initiative and the implementation process influence one another and the overall improvement outcomes? Methods A multi-case study methodology was used to explore the complexities of the phenomena in situ. Three sites where successful quality improvement had occurred were selected by purposeful theoretical sampling to provide a sample of rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practice settings typical of the New Zealand environment. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with team members and triangulated with secondary data provided by the organisations. Results The quality improvement topic and the approach taken were intrinsically linked to context. Sites reported success in achieving the desired outcomes benefitting the patients, practice and staff. Teams did not use formal improvement methods, instead relying on established relationships and elements of change management methods. The culture in all three cases was a large component of why and how these initiatives were successful. Discussion Intrinsic motivation was generated by community connections and networks. This combined with a learning climate generated by distributed leadership and teamwork enabled success. Iterative reflection and sensemaking processes were able to deliver quality improvement success in primary care without the use of formal improvement methods. https://www.publish.csiro.au/hc/pdf/HC22012case studycontextdistributed leadershipgeneral practiceimplementationlearning climate
spellingShingle Lynn McBain
Paul Childerhouse
Jane Cullen
Contextual antecedents of quality improvement: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practice
Journal of Primary Health Care
case study
context
distributed leadership
general practice
implementation
learning climate
title Contextual antecedents of quality improvement: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practice
title_full Contextual antecedents of quality improvement: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practice
title_fullStr Contextual antecedents of quality improvement: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practice
title_full_unstemmed Contextual antecedents of quality improvement: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practice
title_short Contextual antecedents of quality improvement: a comparative case study in rural, urban and Kaupapa Māori general practice
title_sort contextual antecedents of quality improvement a comparative case study in rural urban and kaupapa maori general practice
topic case study
context
distributed leadership
general practice
implementation
learning climate
url https://www.publish.csiro.au/hc/pdf/HC22012
work_keys_str_mv AT lynnmcbain contextualantecedentsofqualityimprovementacomparativecasestudyinruralurbanandkaupapamaorigeneralpractice
AT paulchilderhouse contextualantecedentsofqualityimprovementacomparativecasestudyinruralurbanandkaupapamaorigeneralpractice
AT janecullen contextualantecedentsofqualityimprovementacomparativecasestudyinruralurbanandkaupapamaorigeneralpractice