Local Thermal Comfort and Physiological Responses in Uniform Environments

The thermal perception of different body parts can vary greatly throughout the human body and have different influences on overall thermal sensation and comfort. Various personal comfort systems (PCS) have been developed to stimulate local body parts for the purpose of enhancing human thermal comfor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xianzhun Zhong, Hang Yu, Yin Tang, Huice Mao, Kege Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-12-01
Series:Buildings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/59
_version_ 1797340048597712896
author Xianzhun Zhong
Hang Yu
Yin Tang
Huice Mao
Kege Zhang
author_facet Xianzhun Zhong
Hang Yu
Yin Tang
Huice Mao
Kege Zhang
author_sort Xianzhun Zhong
collection DOAJ
description The thermal perception of different body parts can vary greatly throughout the human body and have different influences on overall thermal sensation and comfort. Various personal comfort systems (PCS) have been developed to stimulate local body parts for the purpose of enhancing human thermal comfort, yet the most effective body parts for intervention remain undetermined. Therefore, a series of climate chamber experiments under five uniform environments with three sets of suits were conducted in this study. The results showed that the head, chest, belly, and hands tended to feel no cooler than overall in cooler environments, but arms and legs felt generally no warmer than overall in warmer environments. The head, trunk and upper arms were more likely to be the comfort-dominant body parts. Additionally, the upper arms and upper back expected temperature regulation measures the most under non-neutral environments, thus they seem to be the two most needed and effective targeted body parts that a PCS could be applied to. The skin temperature and thermal sensation of limbs were more sensitive to indoor air temperatures than those of the torso. However, variations in the skin temperature of the head, chest, upper back, and calves had the strongest correlation with overall sensation vote changes. The above results and conclusions can not only serve as the basis for the future studies of local thermal comfort, but also provide theoretical guidance for the design of future PCS products.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T09:57:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e1ab2795ad0944b3a674646ae98408bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-5309
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T09:57:18Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Buildings
spelling doaj.art-e1ab2795ad0944b3a674646ae98408bd2024-01-29T13:48:27ZengMDPI AGBuildings2075-53092023-12-011415910.3390/buildings14010059Local Thermal Comfort and Physiological Responses in Uniform EnvironmentsXianzhun Zhong0Hang Yu1Yin Tang2Huice Mao3Kege Zhang4School of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinaSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinaThe thermal perception of different body parts can vary greatly throughout the human body and have different influences on overall thermal sensation and comfort. Various personal comfort systems (PCS) have been developed to stimulate local body parts for the purpose of enhancing human thermal comfort, yet the most effective body parts for intervention remain undetermined. Therefore, a series of climate chamber experiments under five uniform environments with three sets of suits were conducted in this study. The results showed that the head, chest, belly, and hands tended to feel no cooler than overall in cooler environments, but arms and legs felt generally no warmer than overall in warmer environments. The head, trunk and upper arms were more likely to be the comfort-dominant body parts. Additionally, the upper arms and upper back expected temperature regulation measures the most under non-neutral environments, thus they seem to be the two most needed and effective targeted body parts that a PCS could be applied to. The skin temperature and thermal sensation of limbs were more sensitive to indoor air temperatures than those of the torso. However, variations in the skin temperature of the head, chest, upper back, and calves had the strongest correlation with overall sensation vote changes. The above results and conclusions can not only serve as the basis for the future studies of local thermal comfort, but also provide theoretical guidance for the design of future PCS products.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/59local thermal comfortlocal skin temperaturelocal thermal expectationuniform environmentpersonal comfort systembuilt environment
spellingShingle Xianzhun Zhong
Hang Yu
Yin Tang
Huice Mao
Kege Zhang
Local Thermal Comfort and Physiological Responses in Uniform Environments
Buildings
local thermal comfort
local skin temperature
local thermal expectation
uniform environment
personal comfort system
built environment
title Local Thermal Comfort and Physiological Responses in Uniform Environments
title_full Local Thermal Comfort and Physiological Responses in Uniform Environments
title_fullStr Local Thermal Comfort and Physiological Responses in Uniform Environments
title_full_unstemmed Local Thermal Comfort and Physiological Responses in Uniform Environments
title_short Local Thermal Comfort and Physiological Responses in Uniform Environments
title_sort local thermal comfort and physiological responses in uniform environments
topic local thermal comfort
local skin temperature
local thermal expectation
uniform environment
personal comfort system
built environment
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/14/1/59
work_keys_str_mv AT xianzhunzhong localthermalcomfortandphysiologicalresponsesinuniformenvironments
AT hangyu localthermalcomfortandphysiologicalresponsesinuniformenvironments
AT yintang localthermalcomfortandphysiologicalresponsesinuniformenvironments
AT huicemao localthermalcomfortandphysiologicalresponsesinuniformenvironments
AT kegezhang localthermalcomfortandphysiologicalresponsesinuniformenvironments