Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial

Abstract Objective The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the performances of two different universal adhesives and one etch-rinse adhesive for restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Material and Methods Twenty patients with at least seve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fatma Dilsad OZ, Esra ERGIN, Simge CANATAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2019-04-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572019000100442&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1818028053562916864
author Fatma Dilsad OZ
Esra ERGIN
Simge CANATAN
author_facet Fatma Dilsad OZ
Esra ERGIN
Simge CANATAN
author_sort Fatma Dilsad OZ
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the performances of two different universal adhesives and one etch-rinse adhesive for restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Material and Methods Twenty patients with at least seven NCCLs were enrolled. Lesions were divided into seven groups according to adhesive systems and application modes: GSE: GLUMA Universal-self-etch, GSL: GLUMA Universal-selective etching, GER: GLUMA Universal-etch-and-rinse, ASE: All-Bond Universal-self-etch, ASL: All-Bond Universal-selective etching, AER: All-Bond Universal-etch-and-rinse, SBE (Control): Single Bond2-etch-and-rinse. A total of 155 NCCLs were restored with a nano hybrid composite (Tetric N-Ceram). Restorations were scored with regard to retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, recurrent caries and post-operative sensitivity using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria after one week, 6, 12 and 24 months. Statistical evaluations were performed using Chi-square tests (p=0.05). Results The recall rate was 81.9% after the 24-month follow-up. The cumulative retention rates for self-etch groups (GSE: 72.2%, ASE:75%) were significantly lower than other experimental groups (GSL: 93.7%, GER: 100%, ASL: 94.1%, AER: 100%, SBE: 100%) at the 24-month follow-up (p<0.05). Regarding marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration, GSE and ASE groups demonstrated more bravo scores after 6 and 12-month observations but differences were not significant (p>0.05). Only one restoration from ASL group demonstrated post-operative sensitivity at 6 and 12-month observations. No secondary caries was observed on the restorations at any recall. At the end of 24-month observations, no significant differences were detected among groups regarding any of the criteria assessed, except retention. Conclusion GLUMA Universal and All-Bond Universal showed better results in etch-and-rinse and selective etching mode compared to the self-etch mode regarding retention. Etch-and-rinse and selective etching application modes of the current universal adhesives tended to provide better clinical outcomes considering the criteria evaluated at the end of 24-month evaluation.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T04:57:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e1c706cac4144c278424bf0ad7e89a60
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-7765
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T04:57:41Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher University of São Paulo
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
spelling doaj.art-e1c706cac4144c278424bf0ad7e89a602022-12-22T02:01:28ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77652019-04-0127010.1590/1678-7757-2018-0358S1678-77572019000100442Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trialFatma Dilsad OZEsra ERGINSimge CANATANAbstract Objective The aim of this randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the performances of two different universal adhesives and one etch-rinse adhesive for restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Material and Methods Twenty patients with at least seven NCCLs were enrolled. Lesions were divided into seven groups according to adhesive systems and application modes: GSE: GLUMA Universal-self-etch, GSL: GLUMA Universal-selective etching, GER: GLUMA Universal-etch-and-rinse, ASE: All-Bond Universal-self-etch, ASL: All-Bond Universal-selective etching, AER: All-Bond Universal-etch-and-rinse, SBE (Control): Single Bond2-etch-and-rinse. A total of 155 NCCLs were restored with a nano hybrid composite (Tetric N-Ceram). Restorations were scored with regard to retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, recurrent caries and post-operative sensitivity using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria after one week, 6, 12 and 24 months. Statistical evaluations were performed using Chi-square tests (p=0.05). Results The recall rate was 81.9% after the 24-month follow-up. The cumulative retention rates for self-etch groups (GSE: 72.2%, ASE:75%) were significantly lower than other experimental groups (GSL: 93.7%, GER: 100%, ASL: 94.1%, AER: 100%, SBE: 100%) at the 24-month follow-up (p<0.05). Regarding marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration, GSE and ASE groups demonstrated more bravo scores after 6 and 12-month observations but differences were not significant (p>0.05). Only one restoration from ASL group demonstrated post-operative sensitivity at 6 and 12-month observations. No secondary caries was observed on the restorations at any recall. At the end of 24-month observations, no significant differences were detected among groups regarding any of the criteria assessed, except retention. Conclusion GLUMA Universal and All-Bond Universal showed better results in etch-and-rinse and selective etching mode compared to the self-etch mode regarding retention. Etch-and-rinse and selective etching application modes of the current universal adhesives tended to provide better clinical outcomes considering the criteria evaluated at the end of 24-month evaluation.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572019000100442&lng=en&tlng=enDental adhesivesDental acid etchingComposite resinsEnamel
spellingShingle Fatma Dilsad OZ
Esra ERGIN
Simge CANATAN
Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Dental adhesives
Dental acid etching
Composite resins
Enamel
title Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Twenty-four-month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch-and-rinse, selective etching and self-etch application modes in NCCL – a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort twenty four month clinical performance of different universal adhesives in etch and rinse selective etching and self etch application modes in nccl a randomized controlled clinical trial
topic Dental adhesives
Dental acid etching
Composite resins
Enamel
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572019000100442&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT fatmadilsadoz twentyfourmonthclinicalperformanceofdifferentuniversaladhesivesinetchandrinseselectiveetchingandselfetchapplicationmodesinncclarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT esraergin twentyfourmonthclinicalperformanceofdifferentuniversaladhesivesinetchandrinseselectiveetchingandselfetchapplicationmodesinncclarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT simgecanatan twentyfourmonthclinicalperformanceofdifferentuniversaladhesivesinetchandrinseselectiveetchingandselfetchapplicationmodesinncclarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial