Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

Purpose: To report the visual and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) and bevacizumab (BVZ) monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: This was a retrospective case series of 16 eyes (8 eyes each in IVZ and BVZ groups). The study period was...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sumit Randhir Singh, Niroj Kumar Sahoo, Nallamasa Rohit Goud, Jay Chhablani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=7;spage=1114;epage=1118;aulast=Singh
_version_ 1818367347564478464
author Sumit Randhir Singh
Niroj Kumar Sahoo
Nallamasa Rohit Goud
Jay Chhablani
author_facet Sumit Randhir Singh
Niroj Kumar Sahoo
Nallamasa Rohit Goud
Jay Chhablani
author_sort Sumit Randhir Singh
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: To report the visual and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) and bevacizumab (BVZ) monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: This was a retrospective case series of 16 eyes (8 eyes each in IVZ and BVZ groups). The study period was from January 2016 to March 2018. The inclusion criteria were treatment-naive PCV patients who were treated with either IVZ or BVZ monotherapy on pro re nata protocol and followed up monthly for 6 months. The change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height was measured at baseline and 6 months. Results: A total of 16 eyes were studied. IVZ group had an improvement in BCVA by 0.15 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; approximately 1.5 lines) at 6 months, whereas BVZ group had a reduction in BCVA by 0.21 logMAR (approximately 2 lines) (P = 0.027). Five patients and one patient in IVZ and BVZ groups, respectively, had ≥5 letters gain of BCVA. IVZ group had significant reduction in PED height (P = 0.048), whereas the change in CMT was not significant at 6 months (P = 0.681). The mean number of injections (2.87 ± 0.83 in IVZ and 2.25 ± 0.89 BVZ group; P = 0.168) and longest treatment-free interval (3.00 ± 2.20 months in IVZ and 2.12 ± 1.96 months in BVZ group; P = 0.41) were not significantly different. Conclusion: The visual and anatomical outcomes in terms of PED reduction in treatment-naive PCV patients were better in IVZ group compared with BVZ. IVZ monotherapy is a viable, cost-effective alternative in these patients with good safety profile.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T22:50:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e1cbb80982c747ae89c4c2f70ec01983
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T22:50:37Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
spelling doaj.art-e1cbb80982c747ae89c4c2f70ec019832022-12-21T23:28:38ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892019-01-016771114111810.4103/ijo.IJO_638_18Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathySumit Randhir SinghNiroj Kumar SahooNallamasa Rohit GoudJay ChhablaniPurpose: To report the visual and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept (IVZ) and bevacizumab (BVZ) monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Methods: This was a retrospective case series of 16 eyes (8 eyes each in IVZ and BVZ groups). The study period was from January 2016 to March 2018. The inclusion criteria were treatment-naive PCV patients who were treated with either IVZ or BVZ monotherapy on pro re nata protocol and followed up monthly for 6 months. The change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height was measured at baseline and 6 months. Results: A total of 16 eyes were studied. IVZ group had an improvement in BCVA by 0.15 logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; approximately 1.5 lines) at 6 months, whereas BVZ group had a reduction in BCVA by 0.21 logMAR (approximately 2 lines) (P = 0.027). Five patients and one patient in IVZ and BVZ groups, respectively, had ≥5 letters gain of BCVA. IVZ group had significant reduction in PED height (P = 0.048), whereas the change in CMT was not significant at 6 months (P = 0.681). The mean number of injections (2.87 ± 0.83 in IVZ and 2.25 ± 0.89 BVZ group; P = 0.168) and longest treatment-free interval (3.00 ± 2.20 months in IVZ and 2.12 ± 1.96 months in BVZ group; P = 0.41) were not significantly different. Conclusion: The visual and anatomical outcomes in terms of PED reduction in treatment-naive PCV patients were better in IVZ group compared with BVZ. IVZ monotherapy is a viable, cost-effective alternative in these patients with good safety profile.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=7;spage=1114;epage=1118;aulast=SinghIntravitreal bevacizumabintravitreal ziv-afliberceptpolypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
spellingShingle Sumit Randhir Singh
Niroj Kumar Sahoo
Nallamasa Rohit Goud
Jay Chhablani
Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Intravitreal bevacizumab
intravitreal ziv-aflibercept
polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
title Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
title_full Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
title_fullStr Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
title_short Comparison of intravitreal ziv-aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment-naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
title_sort comparison of intravitreal ziv aflibercept and bevacizumab monotherapy in treatment naive polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
topic Intravitreal bevacizumab
intravitreal ziv-aflibercept
polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2019;volume=67;issue=7;spage=1114;epage=1118;aulast=Singh
work_keys_str_mv AT sumitrandhirsingh comparisonofintravitrealzivafliberceptandbevacizumabmonotherapyintreatmentnaivepolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathy
AT nirojkumarsahoo comparisonofintravitrealzivafliberceptandbevacizumabmonotherapyintreatmentnaivepolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathy
AT nallamasarohitgoud comparisonofintravitrealzivafliberceptandbevacizumabmonotherapyintreatmentnaivepolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathy
AT jaychhablani comparisonofintravitrealzivafliberceptandbevacizumabmonotherapyintreatmentnaivepolypoidalchoroidalvasculopathy