One-Bed-One-Team—Does an Integrated General Hospital Inpatient Model Improve Care Outcomes and Productivity: An Observational Study

IntroductionWith the increasing complexity of healthcare problems worldwide, the demand for better-coordinated care delivery is on the rise. However, current hospital-based practices remain largely disease-centric and specialist-driven, resulting in fragmented care. This study aimed to evaluate the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi Feng Lai, Shi Qi Lee, Yi-Roe Tan, Zheng Yi Lau, Jason Phua, See Meng Khoo, Satya Pavan Kumar Gollamudi, Cher Wee Lim, Yee Wei Lim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.779910/full
_version_ 1818909966879162368
author Yi Feng Lai
Yi Feng Lai
Yi Feng Lai
Yi Feng Lai
Shi Qi Lee
Yi-Roe Tan
Zheng Yi Lau
Jason Phua
See Meng Khoo
Satya Pavan Kumar Gollamudi
Cher Wee Lim
Yee Wei Lim
Yee Wei Lim
author_facet Yi Feng Lai
Yi Feng Lai
Yi Feng Lai
Yi Feng Lai
Shi Qi Lee
Yi-Roe Tan
Zheng Yi Lau
Jason Phua
See Meng Khoo
Satya Pavan Kumar Gollamudi
Cher Wee Lim
Yee Wei Lim
Yee Wei Lim
author_sort Yi Feng Lai
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionWith the increasing complexity of healthcare problems worldwide, the demand for better-coordinated care delivery is on the rise. However, current hospital-based practices remain largely disease-centric and specialist-driven, resulting in fragmented care. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of an integrated general hospital (IGH) inpatient care model.MethodsRetrospective analysis of medical records between June 2018 and August 2019 compared patients admitted under the IGH model and patients receiving usual care in public hospitals. The IGH model managed patients from one location with a multidisciplinary team, performing needs-based care transition utilizing acuity tagging to match the intensity of care to illness acuity.Results5,000 episodes of IGH care entered analysis. In the absence of care transition in intervention and control, IGH average length of stay (ALOS) was 0.7 days shorter than control. In the group with care transition in intervention but not in control, IGH acute ALOS was 2 days shorter, whereas subacute ALOS was 4.8 days longer. In the presence of care transition in intervention and control, IGH acute ALOS was 6.4 and 10.2 days shorter and subacute ALOS was 15.8 and 26.9 days shorter compared with patients under usual care at acute hospitals with and without co-located community hospitals, respectively. The 30- and 60-days readmission rates of IGH patients were marginally higher than usual care, though not clinically significant.DiscussionsThe IGH care model maybe associated with shorter ALOS of inpatients and optimize resource allocation and service utilization. Patients with dynamic acuity transition benefited from a seamless care transition process.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T22:35:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e1cc13336b074c048d775aec5cda0b11
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2565
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T22:35:19Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Public Health
spelling doaj.art-e1cc13336b074c048d775aec5cda0b112022-12-21T20:03:13ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Public Health2296-25652022-03-011010.3389/fpubh.2022.779910779910One-Bed-One-Team—Does an Integrated General Hospital Inpatient Model Improve Care Outcomes and Productivity: An Observational StudyYi Feng Lai0Yi Feng Lai1Yi Feng Lai2Yi Feng Lai3Shi Qi Lee4Yi-Roe Tan5Zheng Yi Lau6Jason Phua7See Meng Khoo8Satya Pavan Kumar Gollamudi9Cher Wee Lim10Yee Wei Lim11Yee Wei Lim12MOH Office for Healthcare Transformation, Singapore, SingaporeDepartment of Pharmacy, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore, SingaporeDepartment of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SingaporeSchool of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United StatesDivision of Policy Research and Evaluation, Ministry of Health, Singapore, SingaporeMOH Office for Healthcare Transformation, Singapore, SingaporeDivision of Policy Research and Evaluation, Ministry of Health, Singapore, SingaporeAlexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, SingaporeAlexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, SingaporeAlexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, SingaporeMOH Office for Healthcare Transformation, Singapore, SingaporeAlexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, SingaporeDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SingaporeIntroductionWith the increasing complexity of healthcare problems worldwide, the demand for better-coordinated care delivery is on the rise. However, current hospital-based practices remain largely disease-centric and specialist-driven, resulting in fragmented care. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of an integrated general hospital (IGH) inpatient care model.MethodsRetrospective analysis of medical records between June 2018 and August 2019 compared patients admitted under the IGH model and patients receiving usual care in public hospitals. The IGH model managed patients from one location with a multidisciplinary team, performing needs-based care transition utilizing acuity tagging to match the intensity of care to illness acuity.Results5,000 episodes of IGH care entered analysis. In the absence of care transition in intervention and control, IGH average length of stay (ALOS) was 0.7 days shorter than control. In the group with care transition in intervention but not in control, IGH acute ALOS was 2 days shorter, whereas subacute ALOS was 4.8 days longer. In the presence of care transition in intervention and control, IGH acute ALOS was 6.4 and 10.2 days shorter and subacute ALOS was 15.8 and 26.9 days shorter compared with patients under usual care at acute hospitals with and without co-located community hospitals, respectively. The 30- and 60-days readmission rates of IGH patients were marginally higher than usual care, though not clinically significant.DiscussionsThe IGH care model maybe associated with shorter ALOS of inpatients and optimize resource allocation and service utilization. Patients with dynamic acuity transition benefited from a seamless care transition process.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.779910/fullintegrated careacuity transitioninpatientcare coordinationgeneralist
spellingShingle Yi Feng Lai
Yi Feng Lai
Yi Feng Lai
Yi Feng Lai
Shi Qi Lee
Yi-Roe Tan
Zheng Yi Lau
Jason Phua
See Meng Khoo
Satya Pavan Kumar Gollamudi
Cher Wee Lim
Yee Wei Lim
Yee Wei Lim
One-Bed-One-Team—Does an Integrated General Hospital Inpatient Model Improve Care Outcomes and Productivity: An Observational Study
Frontiers in Public Health
integrated care
acuity transition
inpatient
care coordination
generalist
title One-Bed-One-Team—Does an Integrated General Hospital Inpatient Model Improve Care Outcomes and Productivity: An Observational Study
title_full One-Bed-One-Team—Does an Integrated General Hospital Inpatient Model Improve Care Outcomes and Productivity: An Observational Study
title_fullStr One-Bed-One-Team—Does an Integrated General Hospital Inpatient Model Improve Care Outcomes and Productivity: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed One-Bed-One-Team—Does an Integrated General Hospital Inpatient Model Improve Care Outcomes and Productivity: An Observational Study
title_short One-Bed-One-Team—Does an Integrated General Hospital Inpatient Model Improve Care Outcomes and Productivity: An Observational Study
title_sort one bed one team does an integrated general hospital inpatient model improve care outcomes and productivity an observational study
topic integrated care
acuity transition
inpatient
care coordination
generalist
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.779910/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yifenglai onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT yifenglai onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT yifenglai onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT yifenglai onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT shiqilee onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT yiroetan onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT zhengyilau onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT jasonphua onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT seemengkhoo onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT satyapavankumargollamudi onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT cherweelim onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT yeeweilim onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy
AT yeeweilim onebedoneteamdoesanintegratedgeneralhospitalinpatientmodelimprovecareoutcomesandproductivityanobservationalstudy