Single and double injection paravertebral block comparison in reduction mammaplasty cases: a randomized controlled study
Background This study compares the analgesic effects and dermatomal blockade distributions of single and double injection bilateral thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) techniques in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Methods After obtaining ethics committee approval, 60 patients scheduled fo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2023-10-01
|
Series: | Anesthesia and Pain Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://anesth-pain-med.org/upload/pdf/apm-23029.pdf |
_version_ | 1797628877431898112 |
---|---|
author | Vecih Anil Ozonur Emine Aysu Salviz Nukhet Sivrikoz Erol Kozanoglu Soner Karaali Huru Ceren Gokduman Hacer Polat Ufuk Emekli Mehmet Kamil Tugrul Mukadder Orhan-Sungur |
author_facet | Vecih Anil Ozonur Emine Aysu Salviz Nukhet Sivrikoz Erol Kozanoglu Soner Karaali Huru Ceren Gokduman Hacer Polat Ufuk Emekli Mehmet Kamil Tugrul Mukadder Orhan-Sungur |
author_sort | Vecih Anil Ozonur |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background This study compares the analgesic effects and dermatomal blockade distributions of single and double injection bilateral thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) techniques in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Methods After obtaining ethics committee approval, 60 patients scheduled for bilateral reduction mammaplasty were included in the study. Preoperatively, the patients received one of single (Group S: T3–T4) or double (Group D: T2–T3 & T4–T5) injection bilateral TPVBs using bupivacaine 0.375% 20 ml per side. All patients were operated under general anesthesia. The T3–T6 dermatomal blockade distributions on the midclavicular line were followed by pin-prick test for 30 min preoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. All patients received paracetamol 1 g when numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score was ≥ 4, and also tramadol 1 mg/kg when NRS was ≥ 4 again after 1 h. The primary endpoint was NRS pain scores at postoperative 12th h. The secondary endpoints were dermatomal blockade distributions and NRS scores through the postoperative first 48 h, time until first pain and the analgesic consumption on days 1 and 2. Results Fifty-two patients completed the study. The NRS pain scores at 12th h were similar (right side: P = 0.100, left side: P = 0.096). The remaining NRS scores and other parameters were also comparable within the groups (P ≥ 0.05). Only single injection TPVB application time was shorter (P < 0.001). Conclusions The single injection TPVB technique provided sufficient dermatomal distribution and analgesic efficacy with the advantages of being faster and less invasive. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T10:45:25Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e1d2881afb84437ea1c5e8c40fb99f6f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1975-5171 2383-7977 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T10:45:25Z |
publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
publisher | Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | Article |
series | Anesthesia and Pain Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-e1d2881afb84437ea1c5e8c40fb99f6f2023-11-14T06:02:59ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsAnesthesia and Pain Medicine1975-51712383-79772023-10-0118442143010.17085/apm.230291221Single and double injection paravertebral block comparison in reduction mammaplasty cases: a randomized controlled studyVecih Anil Ozonur0Emine Aysu Salviz1Nukhet Sivrikoz2Erol Kozanoglu3Soner Karaali4Huru Ceren Gokduman5Hacer Polat6Ufuk Emekli7Mehmet Kamil Tugrul8Mukadder Orhan-Sungur9 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Liv Hospital Vadİstanbul, Istanbul, Turkiye Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St Louis, School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Sancaktepe State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkiye Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Liv Hospital Vadİstanbul, Istanbul, Turkiye Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, TurkiyeBackground This study compares the analgesic effects and dermatomal blockade distributions of single and double injection bilateral thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) techniques in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty. Methods After obtaining ethics committee approval, 60 patients scheduled for bilateral reduction mammaplasty were included in the study. Preoperatively, the patients received one of single (Group S: T3–T4) or double (Group D: T2–T3 & T4–T5) injection bilateral TPVBs using bupivacaine 0.375% 20 ml per side. All patients were operated under general anesthesia. The T3–T6 dermatomal blockade distributions on the midclavicular line were followed by pin-prick test for 30 min preoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. All patients received paracetamol 1 g when numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score was ≥ 4, and also tramadol 1 mg/kg when NRS was ≥ 4 again after 1 h. The primary endpoint was NRS pain scores at postoperative 12th h. The secondary endpoints were dermatomal blockade distributions and NRS scores through the postoperative first 48 h, time until first pain and the analgesic consumption on days 1 and 2. Results Fifty-two patients completed the study. The NRS pain scores at 12th h were similar (right side: P = 0.100, left side: P = 0.096). The remaining NRS scores and other parameters were also comparable within the groups (P ≥ 0.05). Only single injection TPVB application time was shorter (P < 0.001). Conclusions The single injection TPVB technique provided sufficient dermatomal distribution and analgesic efficacy with the advantages of being faster and less invasive.http://anesth-pain-med.org/upload/pdf/apm-23029.pdfanalgesic consumptiondermatomal blockade distributionpostoperative painreduction mammaplastythoracic paravertebral block |
spellingShingle | Vecih Anil Ozonur Emine Aysu Salviz Nukhet Sivrikoz Erol Kozanoglu Soner Karaali Huru Ceren Gokduman Hacer Polat Ufuk Emekli Mehmet Kamil Tugrul Mukadder Orhan-Sungur Single and double injection paravertebral block comparison in reduction mammaplasty cases: a randomized controlled study Anesthesia and Pain Medicine analgesic consumption dermatomal blockade distribution postoperative pain reduction mammaplasty thoracic paravertebral block |
title | Single and double injection paravertebral block comparison in reduction mammaplasty cases: a randomized controlled study |
title_full | Single and double injection paravertebral block comparison in reduction mammaplasty cases: a randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Single and double injection paravertebral block comparison in reduction mammaplasty cases: a randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Single and double injection paravertebral block comparison in reduction mammaplasty cases: a randomized controlled study |
title_short | Single and double injection paravertebral block comparison in reduction mammaplasty cases: a randomized controlled study |
title_sort | single and double injection paravertebral block comparison in reduction mammaplasty cases a randomized controlled study |
topic | analgesic consumption dermatomal blockade distribution postoperative pain reduction mammaplasty thoracic paravertebral block |
url | http://anesth-pain-med.org/upload/pdf/apm-23029.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vecihanilozonur singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT emineaysusalviz singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT nukhetsivrikoz singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT erolkozanoglu singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT sonerkaraali singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hurucerengokduman singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hacerpolat singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT ufukemekli singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT mehmetkamiltugrul singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT mukadderorhansungur singleanddoubleinjectionparavertebralblockcomparisoninreductionmammaplastycasesarandomizedcontrolledstudy |