Identifying the Best Candidate for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Advanced Osteosarcoma

Objectives Not all patients with stage III and IV osteosarcoma who undergo surgery to remove the primary tumor will benefit from surgery; therefore, we developed a nomogram model to test the hypothesis that only a subset of patients will benefit from surgery. Methods 412 patients were screened from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhengjiang Li, Xingyao Yang, Shuxing Xing
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2024-03-01
Series:Cancer Control
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241242244
_version_ 1797213082282360832
author Zhengjiang Li
Xingyao Yang
Shuxing Xing
author_facet Zhengjiang Li
Xingyao Yang
Shuxing Xing
author_sort Zhengjiang Li
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Not all patients with stage III and IV osteosarcoma who undergo surgery to remove the primary tumor will benefit from surgery; therefore, we developed a nomogram model to test the hypothesis that only a subset of patients will benefit from surgery. Methods 412 patients were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Subsequently, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to screen and balance confounders. We first made the hypothesis that patients who underwent the procedure would benefit more. A multivariate Cox model was used to explore the independent influencing factors of CSS in two groups (benefit group and non-benefit group) and constructed nomograms with predicted prognosis. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to verify the performance of the nomogram. Results Of these patients, approximately 110 did not undergo primary tumour resection. After passing PSM, they were divided into a surgical group and a non-surgical group. Age, primary site and chemotherapy as calculated independent factors were used to construct a nomogra. The predicted nomogram showed good consistency in terms of the ROC curve and the calibration curve, and the DCA curve showed a certain clinical utility. Finally, dividing the surgical patients into surgical beneficiaries and surgical non-beneficiaries, a Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the nomogram can identify patients with osteosarcoma who can benefit from surgery. Conclusion A practical predictive model was established to determine whether patients with stage III or IV osteosarcoma would benefit from surgery.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T10:52:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e1dadd880a9642c4a46976b095b2c76f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1526-2359
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T10:52:37Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Cancer Control
spelling doaj.art-e1dadd880a9642c4a46976b095b2c76f2024-04-12T10:03:19ZengSAGE PublishingCancer Control1526-23592024-03-013110.1177/10732748241242244Identifying the Best Candidate for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Advanced OsteosarcomaZhengjiang LiXingyao YangShuxing XingObjectives Not all patients with stage III and IV osteosarcoma who undergo surgery to remove the primary tumor will benefit from surgery; therefore, we developed a nomogram model to test the hypothesis that only a subset of patients will benefit from surgery. Methods 412 patients were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Subsequently, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to screen and balance confounders. We first made the hypothesis that patients who underwent the procedure would benefit more. A multivariate Cox model was used to explore the independent influencing factors of CSS in two groups (benefit group and non-benefit group) and constructed nomograms with predicted prognosis. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to verify the performance of the nomogram. Results Of these patients, approximately 110 did not undergo primary tumour resection. After passing PSM, they were divided into a surgical group and a non-surgical group. Age, primary site and chemotherapy as calculated independent factors were used to construct a nomogra. The predicted nomogram showed good consistency in terms of the ROC curve and the calibration curve, and the DCA curve showed a certain clinical utility. Finally, dividing the surgical patients into surgical beneficiaries and surgical non-beneficiaries, a Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the nomogram can identify patients with osteosarcoma who can benefit from surgery. Conclusion A practical predictive model was established to determine whether patients with stage III or IV osteosarcoma would benefit from surgery.https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241242244
spellingShingle Zhengjiang Li
Xingyao Yang
Shuxing Xing
Identifying the Best Candidate for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Advanced Osteosarcoma
Cancer Control
title Identifying the Best Candidate for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Advanced Osteosarcoma
title_full Identifying the Best Candidate for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Advanced Osteosarcoma
title_fullStr Identifying the Best Candidate for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Advanced Osteosarcoma
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the Best Candidate for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Advanced Osteosarcoma
title_short Identifying the Best Candidate for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Advanced Osteosarcoma
title_sort identifying the best candidate for primary tumor resection in patients with advanced osteosarcoma
url https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241242244
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengjiangli identifyingthebestcandidateforprimarytumorresectioninpatientswithadvancedosteosarcoma
AT xingyaoyang identifyingthebestcandidateforprimarytumorresectioninpatientswithadvancedosteosarcoma
AT shuxingxing identifyingthebestcandidateforprimarytumorresectioninpatientswithadvancedosteosarcoma