Comparing exploratory factor models of the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment and the Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism
While numerous studies have analyzed the conceptions probed by the Force Concept Inventory (FCI), assessments dedicated to electricity and magnetism lack similar analyses. This paper investigated the conceptions explored by the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment (BEMA) and the Conceptual Sur...
Main Authors: | Philip Eaton, Barrett Frank, Keith Johnson, Shannon Willoughby |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Physical Review Physics Education Research |
Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020133 |
Similar Items
-
Classical test theory and item response theory comparison of the brief electricity and magnetism assessment and the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
by: Philip Eaton, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment
by: Lin Ding, et al.
Published: (2006-03-01) -
Evaluating an electricity and magnetism assessment tool: Brief electricity and magnetism assessment
by: Robert Beichner, et al.
Published: (2006-03-01) -
Detecting the influence of item chaining on student responses to the Force Concept Inventory and the Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation
by: Philip Eaton, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Exploring the gender gap in the conceptual survey of electricity and magnetism
by: Rachel Henderson, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01)