Impact of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology research

Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify the top 50 countries in the world in clinical neurology research and to use their data to assess the impact of a number of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology. Methods: The SCImago Journal & Cou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bakur A. Jamjoom, Abdulhakim B. Jamjoom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-09-01
Series:eNeurologicalSci
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650216300132
_version_ 1811231488242352128
author Bakur A. Jamjoom
Abdulhakim B. Jamjoom
author_facet Bakur A. Jamjoom
Abdulhakim B. Jamjoom
author_sort Bakur A. Jamjoom
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The objective of this study was to identify the top 50 countries in the world in clinical neurology research and to use their data to assess the impact of a number of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology. Methods: The SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SCR) web site was used to identify the top 50 countries in the world based on their total documents in clinical neurology. Using their data 5 country-specific characteristics and 6 productivity indicators (total documents, total cites, h-index, citable documents, self-cites and citations per document) were correlated and examined statistically. Results: The number of universities in the world top 500 and the number of clinical neurology journals enlisted in SCR correlated significantly with each of the 6 indicators. The gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and the percentage of GDP spent on research and development (R & D) correlated significantly with 3 and 4 out of the 6 indicators respectively. The population size did not correlate significantly with any of the 6 indicators. Conclusions: The number of universities in the world top 500 and the number of clinical neurology journals enlisted in SCR appear to have a strong impact on scientific productivity. GDP per capita and spending on R & D appear to have a moderate impact on productivity that is influenced by the indicator used. Furthermore, population size appears to have no significant impact on productivity in clinical neurology research.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:46:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e1eb55c5892f4c558011d852bb5cbc24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-6502
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:46:10Z
publishDate 2016-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series eNeurologicalSci
spelling doaj.art-e1eb55c5892f4c558011d852bb5cbc242022-12-22T03:36:27ZengElseviereNeurologicalSci2405-65022016-09-014C1310.1016/j.ensci.2016.03.002Impact of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology researchBakur A. Jamjoom0Abdulhakim B. Jamjoom1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UKSection of Neurosurgery, King Khalid National Guards Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaObjectives: The objective of this study was to identify the top 50 countries in the world in clinical neurology research and to use their data to assess the impact of a number of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology. Methods: The SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SCR) web site was used to identify the top 50 countries in the world based on their total documents in clinical neurology. Using their data 5 country-specific characteristics and 6 productivity indicators (total documents, total cites, h-index, citable documents, self-cites and citations per document) were correlated and examined statistically. Results: The number of universities in the world top 500 and the number of clinical neurology journals enlisted in SCR correlated significantly with each of the 6 indicators. The gross domestic product (GDP) per capita and the percentage of GDP spent on research and development (R & D) correlated significantly with 3 and 4 out of the 6 indicators respectively. The population size did not correlate significantly with any of the 6 indicators. Conclusions: The number of universities in the world top 500 and the number of clinical neurology journals enlisted in SCR appear to have a strong impact on scientific productivity. GDP per capita and spending on R & D appear to have a moderate impact on productivity that is influenced by the indicator used. Furthermore, population size appears to have no significant impact on productivity in clinical neurology research.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650216300132Clinical neurology researchBibliometricsScientific productivityWorldwide ranking
spellingShingle Bakur A. Jamjoom
Abdulhakim B. Jamjoom
Impact of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology research
eNeurologicalSci
Clinical neurology research
Bibliometrics
Scientific productivity
Worldwide ranking
title Impact of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology research
title_full Impact of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology research
title_fullStr Impact of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology research
title_full_unstemmed Impact of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology research
title_short Impact of country-specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology research
title_sort impact of country specific characteristics on scientific productivity in clinical neurology research
topic Clinical neurology research
Bibliometrics
Scientific productivity
Worldwide ranking
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405650216300132
work_keys_str_mv AT bakurajamjoom impactofcountryspecificcharacteristicsonscientificproductivityinclinicalneurologyresearch
AT abdulhakimbjamjoom impactofcountryspecificcharacteristicsonscientificproductivityinclinicalneurologyresearch