Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis

IntroductionOveractive bladder (OAB) is one of the most common complications in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Choosing the effective treatment is very important in improving their quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare solifenacin (SS) and posterior tibial ne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nastaran Majdinasab, Neda Orakifar, Leila Kouti, Gholamreza Shamsaei, Maryam Seyedtabib, Mohammad Jafari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1107886/full
_version_ 1828010896968908800
author Nastaran Majdinasab
Neda Orakifar
Neda Orakifar
Leila Kouti
Gholamreza Shamsaei
Maryam Seyedtabib
Mohammad Jafari
author_facet Nastaran Majdinasab
Neda Orakifar
Neda Orakifar
Leila Kouti
Gholamreza Shamsaei
Maryam Seyedtabib
Mohammad Jafari
author_sort Nastaran Majdinasab
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionOveractive bladder (OAB) is one of the most common complications in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Choosing the effective treatment is very important in improving their quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare solifenacin (SS) and posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) treatment effects in the MS Patients with OAB.Materials and methodsIn total, 70 MS patients suffering from OAB enrolled in this clinical trial study. Patients with a score of at least 3 according to the OAB questionnaire were randomly divided into two groups (35 patients in each group). In one group, patients received SS (5 mg daily for 4 weeks and 10 mg/day for another 8 weeks) and in a second group, patients were treated by PTNS (12 weekly session, 30 min).ResultsThe mean (SD) age of patients participating in this study was 39.82 (9.088) and 42.41 (9.175) years for the SS group and the PTNS group, respectively. Patients in both groups showed statistically significant improvements in urinary incontinence, micturition, and daytime frequency (p < 0.001). Patients in the SS group had a better response for urinary incontinence after 12 weeks compared to the PTNS group. Also, patients in the SS group reported higher satisfaction and less daytime frequency compared to the PTNS group.ConclusionSS and PTNS were effective for improving the OAB symptoms in patients with MS. However, patients demonstrated a better experience with SS in terms of daytime frequency, urinary incontinence, and treatment satisfaction rate.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:07:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e1ee391a2a29473a9824e7f4fb91bf72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:07:09Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-e1ee391a2a29473a9824e7f4fb91bf722023-02-21T06:35:39ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2023-02-011710.3389/fnins.2023.11078861107886Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosisNastaran Majdinasab0Neda Orakifar1Neda Orakifar2Leila Kouti3Gholamreza Shamsaei4Maryam Seyedtabib5Mohammad Jafari6Member of Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranMusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranFaculty of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Department, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranDepartment of Neurology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranDepartment of Neurology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, IranIntroductionOveractive bladder (OAB) is one of the most common complications in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Choosing the effective treatment is very important in improving their quality of life (QOL). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare solifenacin (SS) and posterior tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) treatment effects in the MS Patients with OAB.Materials and methodsIn total, 70 MS patients suffering from OAB enrolled in this clinical trial study. Patients with a score of at least 3 according to the OAB questionnaire were randomly divided into two groups (35 patients in each group). In one group, patients received SS (5 mg daily for 4 weeks and 10 mg/day for another 8 weeks) and in a second group, patients were treated by PTNS (12 weekly session, 30 min).ResultsThe mean (SD) age of patients participating in this study was 39.82 (9.088) and 42.41 (9.175) years for the SS group and the PTNS group, respectively. Patients in both groups showed statistically significant improvements in urinary incontinence, micturition, and daytime frequency (p < 0.001). Patients in the SS group had a better response for urinary incontinence after 12 weeks compared to the PTNS group. Also, patients in the SS group reported higher satisfaction and less daytime frequency compared to the PTNS group.ConclusionSS and PTNS were effective for improving the OAB symptoms in patients with MS. However, patients demonstrated a better experience with SS in terms of daytime frequency, urinary incontinence, and treatment satisfaction rate.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1107886/fullmultiple sclerosisoveractive bladderquality of lifeelectrical nerve stimulationsolifenacin
spellingShingle Nastaran Majdinasab
Neda Orakifar
Neda Orakifar
Leila Kouti
Gholamreza Shamsaei
Maryam Seyedtabib
Mohammad Jafari
Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
Frontiers in Neuroscience
multiple sclerosis
overactive bladder
quality of life
electrical nerve stimulation
solifenacin
title Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_short Solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
title_sort solifenacin versus posterior tibial nerve stimulation for overactive bladder in patients with multiple sclerosis
topic multiple sclerosis
overactive bladder
quality of life
electrical nerve stimulation
solifenacin
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2023.1107886/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nastaranmajdinasab solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT nedaorakifar solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT nedaorakifar solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT leilakouti solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT gholamrezashamsaei solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT maryamseyedtabib solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT mohammadjafari solifenacinversusposteriortibialnervestimulationforoveractivebladderinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis