Comparative Analysis of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution for Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Candida Isolates Against Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole and Caspofungin

Background: Antifungal susceptibility testing remains an area of intense interest because of the increasing number of clinical isolates resistant to antifungal therapy. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute has proposed reference broth micro dilution (BMD) method for susceptibility testing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deepak Kumar, Sayan Bhattacharyya, Prashant Gupta, Gopa Banerjee, Mastan Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2015-11-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/6735/14119_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(PAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
_version_ 1818454924851150848
author Deepak Kumar
Sayan Bhattacharyya
Prashant Gupta
Gopa Banerjee
Mastan Singh
author_facet Deepak Kumar
Sayan Bhattacharyya
Prashant Gupta
Gopa Banerjee
Mastan Singh
author_sort Deepak Kumar
collection DOAJ
description Background: Antifungal susceptibility testing remains an area of intense interest because of the increasing number of clinical isolates resistant to antifungal therapy. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute has proposed reference broth micro dilution (BMD) method for susceptibility testing. The reference method is time-consuming and poorly suited for the routine clinical laboratory setting. Agar-based susceptibility testing methods, disk diffusion (DD) method and the E-test method can be an easier, reliable and less time consuming alternative for the BMD method. Aim: To compare the results of Amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and Caspofungin susceptibility testing by DD, and the E-test method with the CLSI reference method for clinical Candida isolates. Materials and Methods: Broth Microdilution (BMD), E-test and Disk diffusion testing of the various clinical Candida isolates was performed in accordance with CLSI documents. The results obtained were analysed and compared. Results: The categorical agreement for Amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and Caspofungin susceptibility results by E-test and DD method was 65.2%, 67.4%; 100%, 82.6%; 100%, 100%; 100%, 97.8% respectively. Conclusion: The agar-based E-test and disk diffusion methods are reliable alternatives to the BMD method for Candida isolates when test susceptible to fluconazole, voriconazole, and Caspofungin, however the susceptibility testing results must be interpreted with caution in case of Amphotericin B.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T22:02:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e1f0d726228149ca8230749ad761fba0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T22:02:37Z
publishDate 2015-11-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
spelling doaj.art-e1f0d726228149ca8230749ad761fba02022-12-21T22:45:56ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2015-11-01911DC01DC0410.7860/JCDR/2015/14119.6735Comparative Analysis of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution for Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Candida Isolates Against Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole and CaspofunginDeepak Kumar0Sayan Bhattacharyya1Prashant Gupta2Gopa Banerjee3Mastan Singh4Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, IMS, BHU Varanasi, U.P., India.Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, AIIMS, Patna, India. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, India. Professor, Department of Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, India. Professor and HOD, Department of Microbiology, King George’s Medical University, Lucknow, India.Background: Antifungal susceptibility testing remains an area of intense interest because of the increasing number of clinical isolates resistant to antifungal therapy. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute has proposed reference broth micro dilution (BMD) method for susceptibility testing. The reference method is time-consuming and poorly suited for the routine clinical laboratory setting. Agar-based susceptibility testing methods, disk diffusion (DD) method and the E-test method can be an easier, reliable and less time consuming alternative for the BMD method. Aim: To compare the results of Amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and Caspofungin susceptibility testing by DD, and the E-test method with the CLSI reference method for clinical Candida isolates. Materials and Methods: Broth Microdilution (BMD), E-test and Disk diffusion testing of the various clinical Candida isolates was performed in accordance with CLSI documents. The results obtained were analysed and compared. Results: The categorical agreement for Amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and Caspofungin susceptibility results by E-test and DD method was 65.2%, 67.4%; 100%, 82.6%; 100%, 100%; 100%, 97.8% respectively. Conclusion: The agar-based E-test and disk diffusion methods are reliable alternatives to the BMD method for Candida isolates when test susceptible to fluconazole, voriconazole, and Caspofungin, however the susceptibility testing results must be interpreted with caution in case of Amphotericin B.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/6735/14119_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(PAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdfantifungal susceptibility testingantifungal therapyclsi reference method
spellingShingle Deepak Kumar
Sayan Bhattacharyya
Prashant Gupta
Gopa Banerjee
Mastan Singh
Comparative Analysis of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution for Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Candida Isolates Against Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole and Caspofungin
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
antifungal susceptibility testing
antifungal therapy
clsi reference method
title Comparative Analysis of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution for Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Candida Isolates Against Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole and Caspofungin
title_full Comparative Analysis of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution for Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Candida Isolates Against Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole and Caspofungin
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution for Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Candida Isolates Against Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole and Caspofungin
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution for Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Candida Isolates Against Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole and Caspofungin
title_short Comparative Analysis of Disc Diffusion and E-test with Broth Micro-dilution for Susceptibility Testing of Clinical Candida Isolates Against Amphotericin B, Fluconazole, Voriconazole and Caspofungin
title_sort comparative analysis of disc diffusion and e test with broth micro dilution for susceptibility testing of clinical candida isolates against amphotericin b fluconazole voriconazole and caspofungin
topic antifungal susceptibility testing
antifungal therapy
clsi reference method
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/6735/14119_CE(RA1)_F(T)_PF1(PAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT deepakkumar comparativeanalysisofdiscdiffusionandetestwithbrothmicrodilutionforsusceptibilitytestingofclinicalcandidaisolatesagainstamphotericinbfluconazolevoriconazoleandcaspofungin
AT sayanbhattacharyya comparativeanalysisofdiscdiffusionandetestwithbrothmicrodilutionforsusceptibilitytestingofclinicalcandidaisolatesagainstamphotericinbfluconazolevoriconazoleandcaspofungin
AT prashantgupta comparativeanalysisofdiscdiffusionandetestwithbrothmicrodilutionforsusceptibilitytestingofclinicalcandidaisolatesagainstamphotericinbfluconazolevoriconazoleandcaspofungin
AT gopabanerjee comparativeanalysisofdiscdiffusionandetestwithbrothmicrodilutionforsusceptibilitytestingofclinicalcandidaisolatesagainstamphotericinbfluconazolevoriconazoleandcaspofungin
AT mastansingh comparativeanalysisofdiscdiffusionandetestwithbrothmicrodilutionforsusceptibilitytestingofclinicalcandidaisolatesagainstamphotericinbfluconazolevoriconazoleandcaspofungin