Experimental and Numerical Study of the Elastic SCF of Tubular Joints

This paper provides data on stress concentration factors (SCFs) from experimental measurements on cruciform tubular joints of a chord and brace intersection under axial loading. High-fidelity finite element models were generated and validated against these measurements. Further, the statistical vari...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mostafa Atteya, Ove Mikkelsen, John Wintle, Gerhard Ersdal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/15/4220
_version_ 1797525414176882688
author Mostafa Atteya
Ove Mikkelsen
John Wintle
Gerhard Ersdal
author_facet Mostafa Atteya
Ove Mikkelsen
John Wintle
Gerhard Ersdal
author_sort Mostafa Atteya
collection DOAJ
description This paper provides data on stress concentration factors (SCFs) from experimental measurements on cruciform tubular joints of a chord and brace intersection under axial loading. High-fidelity finite element models were generated and validated against these measurements. Further, the statistical variation and the uncertainty in both experiments and finite element analysis (FEA) are studied, including the effect of finite element modelling of the weld profile, mesh size, element type and the method for deriving the SCF. A method is proposed for modelling such uncertainties in order to determine a reasonable SCF. Traditionally, SCF are determined by parametric formulae found in codes and standards and the paper also provides these for comparison. Results from the FEA generally show that the SCF increases with a finer mesh, 2nd order brick elements, linear extrapolation and a larger weld profile. Comparison between experimental SCFs indicates that a very fine mesh and the use of 2nd order elements is required to provide SCF on the safe side. It is further found that the parametric SCF equations in codes are reasonably on the safe side and a detailed finite element analysis could be beneficial if small gains in fatigue life need to be justified.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:12:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e2067428fdba411283f05b797b33cefa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:12:31Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-e2067428fdba411283f05b797b33cefa2023-11-22T05:53:27ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442021-07-011415422010.3390/ma14154220Experimental and Numerical Study of the Elastic SCF of Tubular JointsMostafa Atteya0Ove Mikkelsen1John Wintle2Gerhard Ersdal3Department of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, NorwayDepartment of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, NorwayDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UKDepartment of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, 4021 Stavanger, NorwayThis paper provides data on stress concentration factors (SCFs) from experimental measurements on cruciform tubular joints of a chord and brace intersection under axial loading. High-fidelity finite element models were generated and validated against these measurements. Further, the statistical variation and the uncertainty in both experiments and finite element analysis (FEA) are studied, including the effect of finite element modelling of the weld profile, mesh size, element type and the method for deriving the SCF. A method is proposed for modelling such uncertainties in order to determine a reasonable SCF. Traditionally, SCF are determined by parametric formulae found in codes and standards and the paper also provides these for comparison. Results from the FEA generally show that the SCF increases with a finer mesh, 2nd order brick elements, linear extrapolation and a larger weld profile. Comparison between experimental SCFs indicates that a very fine mesh and the use of 2nd order elements is required to provide SCF on the safe side. It is further found that the parametric SCF equations in codes are reasonably on the safe side and a detailed finite element analysis could be beneficial if small gains in fatigue life need to be justified.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/15/4220fatigueoffshore structuresexperimental testingtubular jointshot spot stress (HSS)stress concentration factors (SCF)
spellingShingle Mostafa Atteya
Ove Mikkelsen
John Wintle
Gerhard Ersdal
Experimental and Numerical Study of the Elastic SCF of Tubular Joints
Materials
fatigue
offshore structures
experimental testing
tubular joints
hot spot stress (HSS)
stress concentration factors (SCF)
title Experimental and Numerical Study of the Elastic SCF of Tubular Joints
title_full Experimental and Numerical Study of the Elastic SCF of Tubular Joints
title_fullStr Experimental and Numerical Study of the Elastic SCF of Tubular Joints
title_full_unstemmed Experimental and Numerical Study of the Elastic SCF of Tubular Joints
title_short Experimental and Numerical Study of the Elastic SCF of Tubular Joints
title_sort experimental and numerical study of the elastic scf of tubular joints
topic fatigue
offshore structures
experimental testing
tubular joints
hot spot stress (HSS)
stress concentration factors (SCF)
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/14/15/4220
work_keys_str_mv AT mostafaatteya experimentalandnumericalstudyoftheelasticscfoftubularjoints
AT ovemikkelsen experimentalandnumericalstudyoftheelasticscfoftubularjoints
AT johnwintle experimentalandnumericalstudyoftheelasticscfoftubularjoints
AT gerhardersdal experimentalandnumericalstudyoftheelasticscfoftubularjoints