Geospatial modelling of large-wood supply to rivers: a state-of-the-art model comparison in Swiss mountain river catchments

<p>Different models have been used in science and practice to identify instream large-wood (LW) sources and to estimate LW supply to rivers. This contribution reviews the existing models proposed in the last 35 years and compares two of the most recent geographic information system (GIS)-based...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Steeb, V. Ruiz-Villanueva, A. Badoux, C. Rickli, A. Mini, M. Stoffel, D. Rickenmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-06-01
Series:Earth Surface Dynamics
Online Access:https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/11/487/2023/esurf-11-487-2023.pdf
_version_ 1827921287261978624
author N. Steeb
V. Ruiz-Villanueva
V. Ruiz-Villanueva
A. Badoux
C. Rickli
A. Mini
M. Stoffel
M. Stoffel
M. Stoffel
D. Rickenmann
author_facet N. Steeb
V. Ruiz-Villanueva
V. Ruiz-Villanueva
A. Badoux
C. Rickli
A. Mini
M. Stoffel
M. Stoffel
M. Stoffel
D. Rickenmann
author_sort N. Steeb
collection DOAJ
description <p>Different models have been used in science and practice to identify instream large-wood (LW) sources and to estimate LW supply to rivers. This contribution reviews the existing models proposed in the last 35 years and compares two of the most recent geographic information system (GIS)-based models by applying them to 40 catchments in Switzerland. Both models, which we call here the empirical GIS approach (EGA) and fuzzy-logic GIS approach (FGA), consider landslides, debris flows, bank erosion, and mobilization of instream wood as recruitment processes and compute volumetric estimates of LW supply based on three different scenarios of process frequency and magnitude. Despite being developed following similar concepts and fed with similar input data, the results from the two models differ markedly. In general, estimated supply wood volumes were larger in each of the scenarios when computed with the FGA and lower with the EGA models. Landslides were the dominant process identified by the EGA, whereas bank erosion was the predominant process according to the FGA model. These differences are discussed, and results are compared to available observations coming from a unique database. Regardless of the limitations of these models, they are useful tools for hazard assessment, the design of infrastructure, and other management strategies.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:25:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e2203879a8164d4b9b44584d1d5b0a77
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-6311
2196-632X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:25:19Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Earth Surface Dynamics
spelling doaj.art-e2203879a8164d4b9b44584d1d5b0a772023-06-20T07:14:11ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2023-06-011148750910.5194/esurf-11-487-2023Geospatial modelling of large-wood supply to rivers: a state-of-the-art model comparison in Swiss mountain river catchmentsN. Steeb0V. Ruiz-Villanueva1V. Ruiz-Villanueva2A. Badoux3C. Rickli4A. Mini5M. Stoffel6M. Stoffel7M. Stoffel8D. Rickenmann9Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandC-CIA-Climate Change Impacts and Risks in the Anthropocene, Institute for Environmental Sciences (ISE), University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, SwitzerlandInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics (IDYST), Faculty of Geoscience and Environment, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, SwitzerlandSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandInstitute of Earth Surface Dynamics (IDYST), Faculty of Geoscience and Environment, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, SwitzerlandC-CIA-Climate Change Impacts and Risks in the Anthropocene, Institute for Environmental Sciences (ISE), University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, SwitzerlandDendrolab.ch, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, SwitzerlandDepartment F.-A. Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, SwitzerlandSwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland<p>Different models have been used in science and practice to identify instream large-wood (LW) sources and to estimate LW supply to rivers. This contribution reviews the existing models proposed in the last 35 years and compares two of the most recent geographic information system (GIS)-based models by applying them to 40 catchments in Switzerland. Both models, which we call here the empirical GIS approach (EGA) and fuzzy-logic GIS approach (FGA), consider landslides, debris flows, bank erosion, and mobilization of instream wood as recruitment processes and compute volumetric estimates of LW supply based on three different scenarios of process frequency and magnitude. Despite being developed following similar concepts and fed with similar input data, the results from the two models differ markedly. In general, estimated supply wood volumes were larger in each of the scenarios when computed with the FGA and lower with the EGA models. Landslides were the dominant process identified by the EGA, whereas bank erosion was the predominant process according to the FGA model. These differences are discussed, and results are compared to available observations coming from a unique database. Regardless of the limitations of these models, they are useful tools for hazard assessment, the design of infrastructure, and other management strategies.</p>https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/11/487/2023/esurf-11-487-2023.pdf
spellingShingle N. Steeb
V. Ruiz-Villanueva
V. Ruiz-Villanueva
A. Badoux
C. Rickli
A. Mini
M. Stoffel
M. Stoffel
M. Stoffel
D. Rickenmann
Geospatial modelling of large-wood supply to rivers: a state-of-the-art model comparison in Swiss mountain river catchments
Earth Surface Dynamics
title Geospatial modelling of large-wood supply to rivers: a state-of-the-art model comparison in Swiss mountain river catchments
title_full Geospatial modelling of large-wood supply to rivers: a state-of-the-art model comparison in Swiss mountain river catchments
title_fullStr Geospatial modelling of large-wood supply to rivers: a state-of-the-art model comparison in Swiss mountain river catchments
title_full_unstemmed Geospatial modelling of large-wood supply to rivers: a state-of-the-art model comparison in Swiss mountain river catchments
title_short Geospatial modelling of large-wood supply to rivers: a state-of-the-art model comparison in Swiss mountain river catchments
title_sort geospatial modelling of large wood supply to rivers a state of the art model comparison in swiss mountain river catchments
url https://esurf.copernicus.org/articles/11/487/2023/esurf-11-487-2023.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nsteeb geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments
AT vruizvillanueva geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments
AT vruizvillanueva geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments
AT abadoux geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments
AT crickli geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments
AT amini geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments
AT mstoffel geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments
AT mstoffel geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments
AT mstoffel geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments
AT drickenmann geospatialmodellingoflargewoodsupplytoriversastateoftheartmodelcomparisoninswissmountainrivercatchments