Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes

Background: This study investigated the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial effects of three mouthwashes on su-pragingival plaque microbiota. The three mouthwashes under study were 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX), Listerine®, and Persica (PM). Water was used as negative control. Methods: Supragingival plaq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad HAERIAN-ARDAKANI, Mahsa REZAEI, Mohammadreza TALEBI- ARDAKANI, Nasrin KESHAVARZ-VALIAN, Reza AMID, Mansoor MEIMANDI, Azadeh ESMAILNEJAD, Azarnoosh ARIANKIA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-10-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/3335
_version_ 1818393926862635008
author Ahmad HAERIAN-ARDAKANI
Mahsa REZAEI
Mohammadreza TALEBI- ARDAKANI
Nasrin KESHAVARZ-VALIAN
Reza AMID
Mansoor MEIMANDI
Azadeh ESMAILNEJAD
Azarnoosh ARIANKIA
author_facet Ahmad HAERIAN-ARDAKANI
Mahsa REZAEI
Mohammadreza TALEBI- ARDAKANI
Nasrin KESHAVARZ-VALIAN
Reza AMID
Mansoor MEIMANDI
Azadeh ESMAILNEJAD
Azarnoosh ARIANKIA
author_sort Ahmad HAERIAN-ARDAKANI
collection DOAJ
description Background: This study investigated the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial effects of three mouthwashes on su-pragingival plaque microbiota. The three mouthwashes under study were 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX), Listerine®, and Persica (PM). Water was used as negative control. Methods: Supragingival plaque samples were collected from 32 patients with gingivitis in the Dental School of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in March 2014. Plaque samples were swabbed on agar plates and discs (previ-ously immersed in the three mouthwashes) were placed on the agar. The zone of bacterial inhibition (ZOI) was meas-ured after incubation for 24 hours. For the in vivo testing, the same plaque samples were inoculated on agar and the colony forming units (CFU) were counted. The patients were then instructed to use the mouthwashes (cases) and wa-ter (controls) for two weeks, after which plaque samples were again collected, inoculated and the CFUs were counted. Results: For the ZOI test, 0.2% CHX inhibited the growth of bacteria to an average diameter of 18.38 mm, while Listerine®, PM and water caused no inhibition of bacterial growth around the discs after 24 hours. The mean bacterial count after using 0.2% CHX for two weeks decreased by 23.13 CFU. This was followed by Listerine®, with a mean reduction of 19.75 CFU. PM resulted in 13.5 CFU decrease in the mean bacterial count, while water reduced the bac-terial count by only 1 CFU. Conclusion: 0.2% CHX inhibits bacterial growth considerably. All three mouthwashes can reduce total bacterial count after 2 weeks although with different mean bacterial count reduction.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T05:53:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e22334eac7ed48dc9e233ed2f89e190b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-6085
2251-6093
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T05:53:05Z
publishDate 2015-10-01
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Public Health
spelling doaj.art-e22334eac7ed48dc9e233ed2f89e190b2022-12-21T23:14:40ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesIranian Journal of Public Health2251-60852251-60932015-10-014473248Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different MouthwashesAhmad HAERIAN-ARDAKANI0Mahsa REZAEI1Mohammadreza TALEBI- ARDAKANI2Nasrin KESHAVARZ-VALIAN3Reza AMID4Mansoor MEIMANDI5Azadeh ESMAILNEJAD6Azarnoosh ARIANKIA7Dept. of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.Dept. of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.Dept. of Periodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Dept. of Periodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Dept. of Periodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Dept. of Periodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Dept. of Periodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Dept. of Periodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.Background: This study investigated the in vitro and in vivo antibacterial effects of three mouthwashes on su-pragingival plaque microbiota. The three mouthwashes under study were 0.2% chlorhexidine (CHX), Listerine®, and Persica (PM). Water was used as negative control. Methods: Supragingival plaque samples were collected from 32 patients with gingivitis in the Dental School of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in March 2014. Plaque samples were swabbed on agar plates and discs (previ-ously immersed in the three mouthwashes) were placed on the agar. The zone of bacterial inhibition (ZOI) was meas-ured after incubation for 24 hours. For the in vivo testing, the same plaque samples were inoculated on agar and the colony forming units (CFU) were counted. The patients were then instructed to use the mouthwashes (cases) and wa-ter (controls) for two weeks, after which plaque samples were again collected, inoculated and the CFUs were counted. Results: For the ZOI test, 0.2% CHX inhibited the growth of bacteria to an average diameter of 18.38 mm, while Listerine®, PM and water caused no inhibition of bacterial growth around the discs after 24 hours. The mean bacterial count after using 0.2% CHX for two weeks decreased by 23.13 CFU. This was followed by Listerine®, with a mean reduction of 19.75 CFU. PM resulted in 13.5 CFU decrease in the mean bacterial count, while water reduced the bac-terial count by only 1 CFU. Conclusion: 0.2% CHX inhibits bacterial growth considerably. All three mouthwashes can reduce total bacterial count after 2 weeks although with different mean bacterial count reduction.https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/3335MouthwashesPeriodontitisAntibacterial activityBacterial biofilm
spellingShingle Ahmad HAERIAN-ARDAKANI
Mahsa REZAEI
Mohammadreza TALEBI- ARDAKANI
Nasrin KESHAVARZ-VALIAN
Reza AMID
Mansoor MEIMANDI
Azadeh ESMAILNEJAD
Azarnoosh ARIANKIA
Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes
Iranian Journal of Public Health
Mouthwashes
Periodontitis
Antibacterial activity
Bacterial biofilm
title Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes
title_full Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes
title_fullStr Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes
title_short Comparison of Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Mouthwashes
title_sort comparison of antimicrobial effects of three different mouthwashes
topic Mouthwashes
Periodontitis
Antibacterial activity
Bacterial biofilm
url https://ijph.tums.ac.ir/index.php/ijph/article/view/3335
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadhaerianardakani comparisonofantimicrobialeffectsofthreedifferentmouthwashes
AT mahsarezaei comparisonofantimicrobialeffectsofthreedifferentmouthwashes
AT mohammadrezatalebiardakani comparisonofantimicrobialeffectsofthreedifferentmouthwashes
AT nasrinkeshavarzvalian comparisonofantimicrobialeffectsofthreedifferentmouthwashes
AT rezaamid comparisonofantimicrobialeffectsofthreedifferentmouthwashes
AT mansoormeimandi comparisonofantimicrobialeffectsofthreedifferentmouthwashes
AT azadehesmailnejad comparisonofantimicrobialeffectsofthreedifferentmouthwashes
AT azarnooshariankia comparisonofantimicrobialeffectsofthreedifferentmouthwashes