Dėl asmeninių įvardžių formų <em>(mūs)-uje </em>ir <em>(mūs)-yje </em>kilmės
<p><strong>ON THE ORIGIN OF THE PERSONAL PRONOUNS </strong><strong><em>(mūs)-uje </em></strong><strong>AND </strong><strong><em>(mūs)-yje </em></strong></p><p><em>Summary</em></p><p>In t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Vilnius University
2011-05-01
|
| Series: | Baltistica |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/1001 |
| _version_ | 1818255798708469760 |
|---|---|
| author | Albertas Rosinas |
| author_facet | Albertas Rosinas |
| author_sort | Albertas Rosinas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p><strong>ON THE ORIGIN OF THE PERSONAL PRONOUNS </strong><strong><em>(mūs)-uje </em></strong><strong>AND </strong><strong><em>(mūs)-yje </em></strong></p><p><em>Summary</em></p><p>In the article the author comes to the conclusion that the „plural“ form of the personal pronoun <em>(mūs)-uje </em>in the Lithuanian dialect of East Prussia is as old as that of the adessive <em>(mūs)-upi. </em>The forms in question seem to derive from the non-paradigmatic locativ <em>*(mūs)-u.</em></p><p>The forms of the reflexive pronoun, having the complementary distribution of „plural“ (but having no category of person), are, in some cases, substitutes for personal pronouns. This leads to the conclusion that the adessive <em>(</em><em>mūs)-upi </em>could have been replaced by <em>(</em><em>mūs)-ipi, </em>cf. <em>savipi. </em>Similar reasons may have caused the appearance of the inessive <em>(mūs)-yje </em>(cf. <em>savyje); </em>but its realization, at that time, became impossible as the contrast between the adessive and the inessive was neutralized. (In written records the adessive <em>(mūs)-i(m)pi </em>fulfils the function of the inessive).</p>Only at the beginning of the 18th century when the necessity to unify the distinctive features of the inessive (i.e. to eliminate the contradiction between the identity and distinctive-features of the inessive) arose, was the adessive morpheme <em>-i(m)p </em>replaced by <em>-yje </em>which fitted best with the whole inessive system. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-12T17:17:35Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e245b064c4f9477499fa3c9b980e231c |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0132-6503 2345-0045 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-12T17:17:35Z |
| publishDate | 2011-05-01 |
| publisher | Vilnius University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Baltistica |
| spelling | doaj.art-e245b064c4f9477499fa3c9b980e231c2022-12-22T00:17:44ZdeuVilnius UniversityBaltistica0132-65032345-00452011-05-017214715210.15388/baltistica.7.2.1001927Dėl asmeninių įvardžių formų <em>(mūs)-uje </em>ir <em>(mūs)-yje </em>kilmėsAlbertas Rosinas<p><strong>ON THE ORIGIN OF THE PERSONAL PRONOUNS </strong><strong><em>(mūs)-uje </em></strong><strong>AND </strong><strong><em>(mūs)-yje </em></strong></p><p><em>Summary</em></p><p>In the article the author comes to the conclusion that the „plural“ form of the personal pronoun <em>(mūs)-uje </em>in the Lithuanian dialect of East Prussia is as old as that of the adessive <em>(mūs)-upi. </em>The forms in question seem to derive from the non-paradigmatic locativ <em>*(mūs)-u.</em></p><p>The forms of the reflexive pronoun, having the complementary distribution of „plural“ (but having no category of person), are, in some cases, substitutes for personal pronouns. This leads to the conclusion that the adessive <em>(</em><em>mūs)-upi </em>could have been replaced by <em>(</em><em>mūs)-ipi, </em>cf. <em>savipi. </em>Similar reasons may have caused the appearance of the inessive <em>(mūs)-yje </em>(cf. <em>savyje); </em>but its realization, at that time, became impossible as the contrast between the adessive and the inessive was neutralized. (In written records the adessive <em>(mūs)-i(m)pi </em>fulfils the function of the inessive).</p>Only at the beginning of the 18th century when the necessity to unify the distinctive features of the inessive (i.e. to eliminate the contradiction between the identity and distinctive-features of the inessive) arose, was the adessive morpheme <em>-i(m)p </em>replaced by <em>-yje </em>which fitted best with the whole inessive system.http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/1001morfologijaistorinė gramatikaasmeniniai įvardžiai |
| spellingShingle | Albertas Rosinas Dėl asmeninių įvardžių formų <em>(mūs)-uje </em>ir <em>(mūs)-yje </em>kilmės Baltistica morfologija istorinė gramatika asmeniniai įvardžiai |
| title | Dėl asmeninių įvardžių formų <em>(mūs)-uje </em>ir <em>(mūs)-yje </em>kilmės |
| title_full | Dėl asmeninių įvardžių formų <em>(mūs)-uje </em>ir <em>(mūs)-yje </em>kilmės |
| title_fullStr | Dėl asmeninių įvardžių formų <em>(mūs)-uje </em>ir <em>(mūs)-yje </em>kilmės |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dėl asmeninių įvardžių formų <em>(mūs)-uje </em>ir <em>(mūs)-yje </em>kilmės |
| title_short | Dėl asmeninių įvardžių formų <em>(mūs)-uje </em>ir <em>(mūs)-yje </em>kilmės |
| title_sort | del asmeniniu ivardziu formu em mus uje em ir em mus yje em kilmes |
| topic | morfologija istorinė gramatika asmeniniai įvardžiai |
| url | http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/1001 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT albertasrosinas delasmeniniuivardziuformuemmusujeemiremmusyjeemkilmes |