Evaluation of the sexual function of men in Kazakhstan during 2021–2022: A cross‐sectional study

Abstract Background and Aims Assessing male sexual function is an important public health issue in every country. In Kazakhstan, there are currently no reliable statistics on male sexual function. The study aimed at the assessment of sexual function in men in Kazakhstan. Methods Men between the ages...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marat Sikhymbaev, Dinara Ospanova, Andrey Grzhibovsky, Merkhat Akkaliyev, Turar Kurmanbekov, Shynar Tanabayeva, Timur Saliev, Sagat Altynbekov, Ildar Fakhradiyev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-03-01
Series:Health Science Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1142
_version_ 1827978586793967616
author Marat Sikhymbaev
Dinara Ospanova
Andrey Grzhibovsky
Merkhat Akkaliyev
Turar Kurmanbekov
Shynar Tanabayeva
Timur Saliev
Sagat Altynbekov
Ildar Fakhradiyev
author_facet Marat Sikhymbaev
Dinara Ospanova
Andrey Grzhibovsky
Merkhat Akkaliyev
Turar Kurmanbekov
Shynar Tanabayeva
Timur Saliev
Sagat Altynbekov
Ildar Fakhradiyev
author_sort Marat Sikhymbaev
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background and Aims Assessing male sexual function is an important public health issue in every country. In Kazakhstan, there are currently no reliable statistics on male sexual function. The study aimed at the assessment of sexual function in men in Kazakhstan. Methods Men between the ages of 18 and 69 from Astana, Almaty, and Shymkent, three of Kazakhstan's biggest cities, were included in the cross‐sectional study in 2021–2022. A standardized and modified Brief Sexual Function Inventory (BSFI) tool was used for participants' interviews. The World Health Organization STEPS questionnaire was employed to gather sociodemographic information, including smoking and alcohol use. Results Respondents from three cities: n = 283 from Almaty, n = 254 from Astana, and n = 232 from Shymkent were interviewed. All participants' average age was 39.2 ± 13.4. Kazakhs made up 79.5% of the respondents by nationality; 19.1% who answered questions on physical activity verified that they were involved in high‐intensity labor. According to the BSFI questionnaire, the respondents from Shymkent had an average total score of 2.82 ± 0.92, (p ≤ 0.05), which was higher than the total scores of respondents from Almaty (2.69 ± 0.87) and Astana (2.69 ± 0.95). A relationship was found between sexual dysfunction and age indicators over 55 years. Participants with overweight had a relationship with sexual dysfunction with an odds ratio (OR): 1.84 (p = 0.01). According to the smoking factor, in study participants with sexual dysfunction, a relationship was also determined, OR: 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79–1.97 (p = 0.001). The presence of high‐intensity activity (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.04–1.91), and physical inactivity (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.89–1.97) were associated with the presence of sexual dysfunction, p ≤ 0.05. Conclusions Our research indicates that men over 50 who smoke, are overweight, and are physically inactive are at risk for sexual dysfunction. Early health promotion may be the most effective method to reduce the negative effects of sexual dysfunction on the health and wellbeing of men over 50.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T21:24:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e24f0aaa89a44646b369e3af1e863d4f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2398-8835
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T21:24:18Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Health Science Reports
spelling doaj.art-e24f0aaa89a44646b369e3af1e863d4f2023-03-28T02:18:38ZengWileyHealth Science Reports2398-88352023-03-0163n/an/a10.1002/hsr2.1142Evaluation of the sexual function of men in Kazakhstan during 2021–2022: A cross‐sectional studyMarat Sikhymbaev0Dinara Ospanova1Andrey Grzhibovsky2Merkhat Akkaliyev3Turar Kurmanbekov4Shynar Tanabayeva5Timur Saliev6Sagat Altynbekov7Ildar Fakhradiyev8Department of Medicine S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University Almaty Republic of KazakhstanDepartment of Medicine Al‐Farabi Kazakh National l University Almaty Republic of KazakhstanDepartment of Medicine Northern State Medical University Arkhangelsk Russian FederationDepartment of Medicine Semey Medical University Almaty Republic of KazakhstanDepartment of Medicine S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University Almaty Republic of KazakhstanDepartment of Medicine S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University Almaty Republic of KazakhstanDepartment of Medicine S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University Almaty Republic of KazakhstanDepartment of Medicine S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University Almaty Republic of KazakhstanDepartment of Medicine S.D. Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University Almaty Republic of KazakhstanAbstract Background and Aims Assessing male sexual function is an important public health issue in every country. In Kazakhstan, there are currently no reliable statistics on male sexual function. The study aimed at the assessment of sexual function in men in Kazakhstan. Methods Men between the ages of 18 and 69 from Astana, Almaty, and Shymkent, three of Kazakhstan's biggest cities, were included in the cross‐sectional study in 2021–2022. A standardized and modified Brief Sexual Function Inventory (BSFI) tool was used for participants' interviews. The World Health Organization STEPS questionnaire was employed to gather sociodemographic information, including smoking and alcohol use. Results Respondents from three cities: n = 283 from Almaty, n = 254 from Astana, and n = 232 from Shymkent were interviewed. All participants' average age was 39.2 ± 13.4. Kazakhs made up 79.5% of the respondents by nationality; 19.1% who answered questions on physical activity verified that they were involved in high‐intensity labor. According to the BSFI questionnaire, the respondents from Shymkent had an average total score of 2.82 ± 0.92, (p ≤ 0.05), which was higher than the total scores of respondents from Almaty (2.69 ± 0.87) and Astana (2.69 ± 0.95). A relationship was found between sexual dysfunction and age indicators over 55 years. Participants with overweight had a relationship with sexual dysfunction with an odds ratio (OR): 1.84 (p = 0.01). According to the smoking factor, in study participants with sexual dysfunction, a relationship was also determined, OR: 1.42; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79–1.97 (p = 0.001). The presence of high‐intensity activity (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.04–1.91), and physical inactivity (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 0.89–1.97) were associated with the presence of sexual dysfunction, p ≤ 0.05. Conclusions Our research indicates that men over 50 who smoke, are overweight, and are physically inactive are at risk for sexual dysfunction. Early health promotion may be the most effective method to reduce the negative effects of sexual dysfunction on the health and wellbeing of men over 50.https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1142agingerectile dysfunctionpopulation‐based researchsexual dysfunctionsexual satisfaction
spellingShingle Marat Sikhymbaev
Dinara Ospanova
Andrey Grzhibovsky
Merkhat Akkaliyev
Turar Kurmanbekov
Shynar Tanabayeva
Timur Saliev
Sagat Altynbekov
Ildar Fakhradiyev
Evaluation of the sexual function of men in Kazakhstan during 2021–2022: A cross‐sectional study
Health Science Reports
aging
erectile dysfunction
population‐based research
sexual dysfunction
sexual satisfaction
title Evaluation of the sexual function of men in Kazakhstan during 2021–2022: A cross‐sectional study
title_full Evaluation of the sexual function of men in Kazakhstan during 2021–2022: A cross‐sectional study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the sexual function of men in Kazakhstan during 2021–2022: A cross‐sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the sexual function of men in Kazakhstan during 2021–2022: A cross‐sectional study
title_short Evaluation of the sexual function of men in Kazakhstan during 2021–2022: A cross‐sectional study
title_sort evaluation of the sexual function of men in kazakhstan during 2021 2022 a cross sectional study
topic aging
erectile dysfunction
population‐based research
sexual dysfunction
sexual satisfaction
url https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1142
work_keys_str_mv AT maratsikhymbaev evaluationofthesexualfunctionofmeninkazakhstanduring20212022acrosssectionalstudy
AT dinaraospanova evaluationofthesexualfunctionofmeninkazakhstanduring20212022acrosssectionalstudy
AT andreygrzhibovsky evaluationofthesexualfunctionofmeninkazakhstanduring20212022acrosssectionalstudy
AT merkhatakkaliyev evaluationofthesexualfunctionofmeninkazakhstanduring20212022acrosssectionalstudy
AT turarkurmanbekov evaluationofthesexualfunctionofmeninkazakhstanduring20212022acrosssectionalstudy
AT shynartanabayeva evaluationofthesexualfunctionofmeninkazakhstanduring20212022acrosssectionalstudy
AT timursaliev evaluationofthesexualfunctionofmeninkazakhstanduring20212022acrosssectionalstudy
AT sagataltynbekov evaluationofthesexualfunctionofmeninkazakhstanduring20212022acrosssectionalstudy
AT ildarfakhradiyev evaluationofthesexualfunctionofmeninkazakhstanduring20212022acrosssectionalstudy