A Qualitative Study of Preclinical Medical Students Randomized to Patient-Partnered vs Traditional Clinical Experiences

Purpose: Longitudinal patient-partnered experiences may promote medical student empathy, but evaluation of such programs is limited. The aim of this study was to compare areas of learning among first-year medical students randomized to a patient-centered track (PCT) or traditional track (TT) longitu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joyce W. Tang, Tia Kostas, Anshu Verma, Valerie G. Press, Josef Kushner, Nicole Gier, Lauren O. Wiklund, Vineet M. Arora, Jeanne Farnan, David O. Meltzer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Advocate Aurora Health 2022-10-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1930&context=jpcrr
_version_ 1797758471633895424
author Joyce W. Tang
Tia Kostas
Anshu Verma
Valerie G. Press
Josef Kushner
Nicole Gier
Lauren O. Wiklund
Vineet M. Arora
Jeanne Farnan
David O. Meltzer
author_facet Joyce W. Tang
Tia Kostas
Anshu Verma
Valerie G. Press
Josef Kushner
Nicole Gier
Lauren O. Wiklund
Vineet M. Arora
Jeanne Farnan
David O. Meltzer
author_sort Joyce W. Tang
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Longitudinal patient-partnered experiences may promote medical student empathy, but evaluation of such programs is limited. The aim of this study was to compare areas of learning among first-year medical students randomized to a patient-centered track (PCT) or traditional track (TT) longitudinal clinical experience. Methods: PCT students (n = 24) were paired with 2 patients and a physician to participate in their patients’ care across multiple settings. TT students (n = 56) were paired with a physician preceptor and participated in caring for a variety of patients in a single setting. This qualitative study used a phenomenological approach to template analysis, examining and comparing student reflective essays for areas of learning. Results: Three domains of learning emerged: 1) Focus of learning (biomedical, patient-centered); 2) Roles and relationships (clinical skills, relationship-building, teaching from preceptor and patients); and 3) Context of care (health systems science, interprofessional care). PCT students described patient-centered learning, relationship-building, and patients’ role as teachers. In contrast, TT students emphasized biomedical learning, clinical skills development, and teaching from physician preceptors. Conclusions: Longitudinal patient-partnered clinical experiences provide rich opportunities for preclinical students to cultivate empathy and develop patient-centered values.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T18:30:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e256c823151e4c568e77a50a679372cd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2330-0698
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T18:30:27Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Advocate Aurora Health
record_format Article
series Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
spelling doaj.art-e256c823151e4c568e77a50a679372cd2023-08-02T08:19:55ZengAdvocate Aurora HealthJournal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews2330-06982022-10-0194290297doi:10.17294/2330-0698.1930A Qualitative Study of Preclinical Medical Students Randomized to Patient-Partnered vs Traditional Clinical ExperiencesJoyce W. Tang0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4792-924XTia Kostas1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2658-4713Anshu Verma2Valerie G. Press3https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-4878Josef Kushner4Nicole Gier5Lauren O. Wiklund6Vineet M. Arora7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4745-7599Jeanne Farnan8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1138-9416David O. Meltzer9University of Chicago, Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, ILCare More Health, Richmond, VAUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, ILLenox Hill Hospital, New York, NYUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, ILMichigan State University, East Lansing, MIUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, ILPurpose: Longitudinal patient-partnered experiences may promote medical student empathy, but evaluation of such programs is limited. The aim of this study was to compare areas of learning among first-year medical students randomized to a patient-centered track (PCT) or traditional track (TT) longitudinal clinical experience. Methods: PCT students (n = 24) were paired with 2 patients and a physician to participate in their patients’ care across multiple settings. TT students (n = 56) were paired with a physician preceptor and participated in caring for a variety of patients in a single setting. This qualitative study used a phenomenological approach to template analysis, examining and comparing student reflective essays for areas of learning. Results: Three domains of learning emerged: 1) Focus of learning (biomedical, patient-centered); 2) Roles and relationships (clinical skills, relationship-building, teaching from preceptor and patients); and 3) Context of care (health systems science, interprofessional care). PCT students described patient-centered learning, relationship-building, and patients’ role as teachers. In contrast, TT students emphasized biomedical learning, clinical skills development, and teaching from physician preceptors. Conclusions: Longitudinal patient-partnered clinical experiences provide rich opportunities for preclinical students to cultivate empathy and develop patient-centered values.https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1930&context=jpcrrpatient-centered learninglongitudinal clinical experienceempathymedical educationtraining
spellingShingle Joyce W. Tang
Tia Kostas
Anshu Verma
Valerie G. Press
Josef Kushner
Nicole Gier
Lauren O. Wiklund
Vineet M. Arora
Jeanne Farnan
David O. Meltzer
A Qualitative Study of Preclinical Medical Students Randomized to Patient-Partnered vs Traditional Clinical Experiences
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
patient-centered learning
longitudinal clinical experience
empathy
medical education
training
title A Qualitative Study of Preclinical Medical Students Randomized to Patient-Partnered vs Traditional Clinical Experiences
title_full A Qualitative Study of Preclinical Medical Students Randomized to Patient-Partnered vs Traditional Clinical Experiences
title_fullStr A Qualitative Study of Preclinical Medical Students Randomized to Patient-Partnered vs Traditional Clinical Experiences
title_full_unstemmed A Qualitative Study of Preclinical Medical Students Randomized to Patient-Partnered vs Traditional Clinical Experiences
title_short A Qualitative Study of Preclinical Medical Students Randomized to Patient-Partnered vs Traditional Clinical Experiences
title_sort qualitative study of preclinical medical students randomized to patient partnered vs traditional clinical experiences
topic patient-centered learning
longitudinal clinical experience
empathy
medical education
training
url https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1930&context=jpcrr
work_keys_str_mv AT joycewtang aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT tiakostas aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT anshuverma aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT valeriegpress aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT josefkushner aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT nicolegier aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT laurenowiklund aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT vineetmarora aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT jeannefarnan aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT davidomeltzer aqualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT joycewtang qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT tiakostas qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT anshuverma qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT valeriegpress qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT josefkushner qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT nicolegier qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT laurenowiklund qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT vineetmarora qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT jeannefarnan qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences
AT davidomeltzer qualitativestudyofpreclinicalmedicalstudentsrandomizedtopatientpartneredvstraditionalclinicalexperiences