An Empirical Analysis of Credibility Assessment in German Asylum Cases
This study analyzes empirically how 236 German court decisions assess the credibility of asylum seekers’ accounts of their persecution. In their reasoning, the courts rely on generally accepted content-based credibility criteria, including consistency, level of detail, and timeliness of the claim. B...
Main Authors: | Björnstjern Baade, Leah Gölz |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2023-03-01
|
Series: | German Law Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2071832223000159/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
An Empirical Analysis of Credibility Assessment in German Asylum Cases – CORRIGENDUM
by: Björnstjern Baade, et al. -
Certifying Credibility: Trajectory of Sub-Saharan Asylum Seekers in Italy
by: Khalid Mouna
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Deserving Asylum and Becoming ‘Good’ Refugees in Madrid
by: Jacqueline Marie Wagner
Published: (2023-04-01) -
The External Dimension of EU Migration and Asylum Policy
by: Narin Idriz, et al. -
Higher acceptance rates of asylum seekers lead to slightly more asylum applications in the future
by: Hannes Weber
Published: (2018-12-01)