“Is there a difference in treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients: Rural Healthcare Providers versus Community Health Workers?”

Introduction: Rural healthcare providers (RHCPs) are the first point of contact for majority of patients in rural parts of India. A total of 75 RHCPs were trained and engaged in Hazaribagh to identify presumptive tuberculosis (TB) patients (PrTBPs) and refer them for diagnosis. Patients diagnosed wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Banuru M Prasad, Sarabjit S Chadha, Pruthu Thekkur, Sashikant Nayak, Vikas S Rajput, Rajesh Ranjan, Rakesh Dayal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=1;spage=259;epage=263;aulast=Prasad
_version_ 1811263981899218944
author Banuru M Prasad
Sarabjit S Chadha
Pruthu Thekkur
Sashikant Nayak
Vikas S Rajput
Rajesh Ranjan
Rakesh Dayal
author_facet Banuru M Prasad
Sarabjit S Chadha
Pruthu Thekkur
Sashikant Nayak
Vikas S Rajput
Rajesh Ranjan
Rakesh Dayal
author_sort Banuru M Prasad
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Rural healthcare providers (RHCPs) are the first point of contact for majority of patients in rural parts of India. A total of 75 RHCPs were trained and engaged in Hazaribagh to identify presumptive tuberculosis (TB) patients (PrTBPs) and refer them for diagnosis. Patients diagnosed with TB were initiated on directly observed treatment short course (DOTS) under the programme. Based on patients' choice, the treatment providers were either RHCPs or community health workers (CHWs). In this paper, we aim to compare the treatment outcomes of TB patients who received DOTS from RHCPs with CHWs. Method: This is a retrospective cohort study using secondary data routinely collected through project and Revised National TB Control Programme. Results: Over the period of 24 months, 57 RHCPs continued to be engaged with project and a total of 382 referrals were made out of which 72 (19%) were diagnosed with TB. Based on choice made, 40 (55%) of TB patients chose RHCPs and 32 (45%) CHWs as their treatment provider. The mean successful treatment completion rate was 87% in the RHCP group compared with 81% for CHWs (P value 0.464). The percentages of unsuccessful outcomes were similar for both groups. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the process to engage RHCPs in TB prevention and care. The study highlights community preference for RHCPs as DOT provider who can produce similar TB treatment success rates as that of CHWs identified by programme.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T19:54:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e27517be07d8494693438d0f9b9ec8f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2249-4863
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T19:54:56Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
spelling doaj.art-e27517be07d8494693438d0f9b9ec8f82022-12-22T03:18:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Family Medicine and Primary Care2249-48632020-01-019125926310.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_729_19“Is there a difference in treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients: Rural Healthcare Providers versus Community Health Workers?”Banuru M PrasadSarabjit S ChadhaPruthu ThekkurSashikant NayakVikas S RajputRajesh RanjanRakesh DayalIntroduction: Rural healthcare providers (RHCPs) are the first point of contact for majority of patients in rural parts of India. A total of 75 RHCPs were trained and engaged in Hazaribagh to identify presumptive tuberculosis (TB) patients (PrTBPs) and refer them for diagnosis. Patients diagnosed with TB were initiated on directly observed treatment short course (DOTS) under the programme. Based on patients' choice, the treatment providers were either RHCPs or community health workers (CHWs). In this paper, we aim to compare the treatment outcomes of TB patients who received DOTS from RHCPs with CHWs. Method: This is a retrospective cohort study using secondary data routinely collected through project and Revised National TB Control Programme. Results: Over the period of 24 months, 57 RHCPs continued to be engaged with project and a total of 382 referrals were made out of which 72 (19%) were diagnosed with TB. Based on choice made, 40 (55%) of TB patients chose RHCPs and 32 (45%) CHWs as their treatment provider. The mean successful treatment completion rate was 87% in the RHCP group compared with 81% for CHWs (P value 0.464). The percentages of unsuccessful outcomes were similar for both groups. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the process to engage RHCPs in TB prevention and care. The study highlights community preference for RHCPs as DOT provider who can produce similar TB treatment success rates as that of CHWs identified by programme.http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=1;spage=259;epage=263;aulast=Prasadcommunity-based screeningcommunity health workersdotsrural healthcare providerstuberculosis
spellingShingle Banuru M Prasad
Sarabjit S Chadha
Pruthu Thekkur
Sashikant Nayak
Vikas S Rajput
Rajesh Ranjan
Rakesh Dayal
“Is there a difference in treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients: Rural Healthcare Providers versus Community Health Workers?”
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
community-based screening
community health workers
dots
rural healthcare providers
tuberculosis
title “Is there a difference in treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients: Rural Healthcare Providers versus Community Health Workers?”
title_full “Is there a difference in treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients: Rural Healthcare Providers versus Community Health Workers?”
title_fullStr “Is there a difference in treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients: Rural Healthcare Providers versus Community Health Workers?”
title_full_unstemmed “Is there a difference in treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients: Rural Healthcare Providers versus Community Health Workers?”
title_short “Is there a difference in treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients: Rural Healthcare Providers versus Community Health Workers?”
title_sort is there a difference in treatment outcome of tuberculosis patients rural healthcare providers versus community health workers
topic community-based screening
community health workers
dots
rural healthcare providers
tuberculosis
url http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2020;volume=9;issue=1;spage=259;epage=263;aulast=Prasad
work_keys_str_mv AT banurumprasad isthereadifferenceintreatmentoutcomeoftuberculosispatientsruralhealthcareprovidersversuscommunityhealthworkers
AT sarabjitschadha isthereadifferenceintreatmentoutcomeoftuberculosispatientsruralhealthcareprovidersversuscommunityhealthworkers
AT pruthuthekkur isthereadifferenceintreatmentoutcomeoftuberculosispatientsruralhealthcareprovidersversuscommunityhealthworkers
AT sashikantnayak isthereadifferenceintreatmentoutcomeoftuberculosispatientsruralhealthcareprovidersversuscommunityhealthworkers
AT vikassrajput isthereadifferenceintreatmentoutcomeoftuberculosispatientsruralhealthcareprovidersversuscommunityhealthworkers
AT rajeshranjan isthereadifferenceintreatmentoutcomeoftuberculosispatientsruralhealthcareprovidersversuscommunityhealthworkers
AT rakeshdayal isthereadifferenceintreatmentoutcomeoftuberculosispatientsruralhealthcareprovidersversuscommunityhealthworkers