Philosophical Background of Evidence-Based Medicine

Through the whole history of medicine, there runs a long struggle between two principal tendencies-empiricism and rationalism. The empirical trend lays its emphasis on "experience" for the cure of the sick. The rationalistic trend lays its main emphasis on "mechanism" for the cau...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: KWON Sang-Ok
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society for the History of Medicine 2004-12-01
Series:Uisahak
Subjects:
Online Access:http://medhist.kams.or.kr/2004/335.pdf
_version_ 1818959907213279232
author KWON Sang-Ok
author_facet KWON Sang-Ok
author_sort KWON Sang-Ok
collection DOAJ
description Through the whole history of medicine, there runs a long struggle between two principal tendencies-empiricism and rationalism. The empirical trend lays its emphasis on "experience" for the cure of the sick. The rationalistic trend lays its main emphasis on "mechanism" for the causes of diseases. The term "evidence-based medicine(EBM)", defined as "the conscious, explicit and judicious use of the best current evidence in making decisions about the individual patients", was introduced about ten years ago. The proponents has been described EBM as a "paradigm shift" that will change medical practice in the years ahead. But there has been considerable debate about the value of EBM. The modern medicine, following philosophy of modern science such as the 'realism controlled by empiricism', has developed biomedical model. But the EBM wrapped with clinical epidemiology and statistics, represents response of empiricism to the rationalism(realism). The roots of EBM extend back at least as far as the Paris clinical school, and the work of Pierre Louis in Paris in the early 19th century. Is EBM a paradigm shift? To answer this question, We have to specify the alternative with which we are comparing EBM. The alternative to EBM is the basic science approach: studying the pathophysiolological mechanism of the body. But EBM is so clearly intertwined with and complementary to the basic science that it would make little sense to see EBM as a paradigm shift away from basic science. In a sense, evidence-based medicine shows only methodological contribution aimed at improving the gathering and sorting of the best information published by biomedical scientists and clinical epidemiologists for use in clinical practice. Although EBM and the traditional medicine embody different approaches, this does not mean that they are competitors. In fact, the two approach need each; neither can stand alone for the development of clinical practice.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T11:49:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e27f5083208e454bb3e57e01737db69b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1225-505X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T11:49:06Z
publishDate 2004-12-01
publisher Korean Society for the History of Medicine
record_format Article
series Uisahak
spelling doaj.art-e27f5083208e454bb3e57e01737db69b2022-12-21T19:41:49ZengKorean Society for the History of MedicineUisahak1225-505X2004-12-01132335346Philosophical Background of Evidence-Based MedicineKWON Sang-OkThrough the whole history of medicine, there runs a long struggle between two principal tendencies-empiricism and rationalism. The empirical trend lays its emphasis on "experience" for the cure of the sick. The rationalistic trend lays its main emphasis on "mechanism" for the causes of diseases. The term "evidence-based medicine(EBM)", defined as "the conscious, explicit and judicious use of the best current evidence in making decisions about the individual patients", was introduced about ten years ago. The proponents has been described EBM as a "paradigm shift" that will change medical practice in the years ahead. But there has been considerable debate about the value of EBM. The modern medicine, following philosophy of modern science such as the 'realism controlled by empiricism', has developed biomedical model. But the EBM wrapped with clinical epidemiology and statistics, represents response of empiricism to the rationalism(realism). The roots of EBM extend back at least as far as the Paris clinical school, and the work of Pierre Louis in Paris in the early 19th century. Is EBM a paradigm shift? To answer this question, We have to specify the alternative with which we are comparing EBM. The alternative to EBM is the basic science approach: studying the pathophysiolological mechanism of the body. But EBM is so clearly intertwined with and complementary to the basic science that it would make little sense to see EBM as a paradigm shift away from basic science. In a sense, evidence-based medicine shows only methodological contribution aimed at improving the gathering and sorting of the best information published by biomedical scientists and clinical epidemiologists for use in clinical practice. Although EBM and the traditional medicine embody different approaches, this does not mean that they are competitors. In fact, the two approach need each; neither can stand alone for the development of clinical practice.http://medhist.kams.or.kr/2004/335.pdfevidence-based medicineempiricismrealism controlled by empiricismparadigm shift
spellingShingle KWON Sang-Ok
Philosophical Background of Evidence-Based Medicine
Uisahak
evidence-based medicine
empiricism
realism controlled by empiricism
paradigm shift
title Philosophical Background of Evidence-Based Medicine
title_full Philosophical Background of Evidence-Based Medicine
title_fullStr Philosophical Background of Evidence-Based Medicine
title_full_unstemmed Philosophical Background of Evidence-Based Medicine
title_short Philosophical Background of Evidence-Based Medicine
title_sort philosophical background of evidence based medicine
topic evidence-based medicine
empiricism
realism controlled by empiricism
paradigm shift
url http://medhist.kams.or.kr/2004/335.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonsangok philosophicalbackgroundofevidencebasedmedicine