Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review
BackgroundThe digitalization of health care has many potential benefits, but it may also negatively impact health care professionals’ well-being. Burnout can, in part, result from inefficient work processes related to the suboptimal implementation and use of health informatio...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Human Factors |
| Online Access: | https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2023/1/e50357 |
| _version_ | 1797658188349177856 |
|---|---|
| author | Marie Wosny Livia Maria Strasser Janna Hastings |
| author_facet | Marie Wosny Livia Maria Strasser Janna Hastings |
| author_sort | Marie Wosny |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundThe digitalization of health care has many potential benefits, but it may also negatively impact health care professionals’ well-being. Burnout can, in part, result from inefficient work processes related to the suboptimal implementation and use of health information technologies. Although strategies to reduce stress and mitigate clinician burnout typically involve individual-based interventions, emerging evidence suggests that improving the experience of using health information technologies can have a notable impact.
ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to collect evidence of the benefits and challenges associated with the use of digital tools in hospital settings with a particular focus on the experiences of health care professionals using these tools.
MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to explore the experience of health care professionals with digital tools in hospital settings. Using a rigorous selection process to ensure the methodological quality and validity of the study results, we included qualitative studies with distinct data that described the experiences of physicians and nurses. A panel of 3 independent researchers performed iterative data analysis and identified thematic constructs.
ResultsOf the 1175 unique primary studies, we identified 17 (1.45%) publications that focused on health care professionals’ experiences with various digital tools in their day-to-day practice. Of the 17 studies, 10 (59%) focused on clinical decision support tools, followed by 6 (35%) studies focusing on electronic health records and 1 (6%) on a remote patient-monitoring tool. We propose a theoretical framework for understanding the complex interplay between the use of digital tools, experience, and outcomes. We identified 6 constructs that encompass the positive and negative experiences of health care professionals when using digital tools, along with moderators and outcomes. Positive experiences included feeling confident, responsible, and satisfied, whereas negative experiences included frustration, feeling overwhelmed, and feeling frightened. Positive moderators that may reinforce the use of digital tools included sufficient training and adequate workflow integration, whereas negative moderators comprised unfavorable social structures and the lack of training. Positive outcomes included improved patient care and increased workflow efficiency, whereas negative outcomes included increased workload, increased safety risks, and issues with information quality.
ConclusionsAlthough positive and negative outcomes and moderators that may affect the use of digital tools were commonly reported, the experiences of health care professionals, such as their thoughts and emotions, were less frequently discussed. On the basis of this finding, this study highlights the need for further research specifically targeting experiences as an important mediator of clinician well-being. It also emphasizes the importance of considering differences in the nature of specific tools as well as the profession and role of individual users.
Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42023393883; https://tinyurl.com/2htpzzxj |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T17:55:32Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e280942d926646a7b83e936d263ec1f1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2292-9495 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T17:55:32Z |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Human Factors |
| spelling | doaj.art-e280942d926646a7b83e936d263ec1f12023-10-17T13:45:59ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Human Factors2292-94952023-10-0110e5035710.2196/50357Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic ReviewMarie Wosnyhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-2791-0774Livia Maria Strasserhttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-3664-5596Janna Hastingshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3469-4923 BackgroundThe digitalization of health care has many potential benefits, but it may also negatively impact health care professionals’ well-being. Burnout can, in part, result from inefficient work processes related to the suboptimal implementation and use of health information technologies. Although strategies to reduce stress and mitigate clinician burnout typically involve individual-based interventions, emerging evidence suggests that improving the experience of using health information technologies can have a notable impact. ObjectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to collect evidence of the benefits and challenges associated with the use of digital tools in hospital settings with a particular focus on the experiences of health care professionals using these tools. MethodsWe conducted a systematic literature review following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to explore the experience of health care professionals with digital tools in hospital settings. Using a rigorous selection process to ensure the methodological quality and validity of the study results, we included qualitative studies with distinct data that described the experiences of physicians and nurses. A panel of 3 independent researchers performed iterative data analysis and identified thematic constructs. ResultsOf the 1175 unique primary studies, we identified 17 (1.45%) publications that focused on health care professionals’ experiences with various digital tools in their day-to-day practice. Of the 17 studies, 10 (59%) focused on clinical decision support tools, followed by 6 (35%) studies focusing on electronic health records and 1 (6%) on a remote patient-monitoring tool. We propose a theoretical framework for understanding the complex interplay between the use of digital tools, experience, and outcomes. We identified 6 constructs that encompass the positive and negative experiences of health care professionals when using digital tools, along with moderators and outcomes. Positive experiences included feeling confident, responsible, and satisfied, whereas negative experiences included frustration, feeling overwhelmed, and feeling frightened. Positive moderators that may reinforce the use of digital tools included sufficient training and adequate workflow integration, whereas negative moderators comprised unfavorable social structures and the lack of training. Positive outcomes included improved patient care and increased workflow efficiency, whereas negative outcomes included increased workload, increased safety risks, and issues with information quality. ConclusionsAlthough positive and negative outcomes and moderators that may affect the use of digital tools were commonly reported, the experiences of health care professionals, such as their thoughts and emotions, were less frequently discussed. On the basis of this finding, this study highlights the need for further research specifically targeting experiences as an important mediator of clinician well-being. It also emphasizes the importance of considering differences in the nature of specific tools as well as the profession and role of individual users. Trial RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42023393883; https://tinyurl.com/2htpzzxjhttps://humanfactors.jmir.org/2023/1/e50357 |
| spellingShingle | Marie Wosny Livia Maria Strasser Janna Hastings Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review JMIR Human Factors |
| title | Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review |
| title_full | Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review |
| title_fullStr | Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review |
| title_short | Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review |
| title_sort | experience of health care professionals using digital tools in the hospital qualitative systematic review |
| url | https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2023/1/e50357 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariewosny experienceofhealthcareprofessionalsusingdigitaltoolsinthehospitalqualitativesystematicreview AT liviamariastrasser experienceofhealthcareprofessionalsusingdigitaltoolsinthehospitalqualitativesystematicreview AT jannahastings experienceofhealthcareprofessionalsusingdigitaltoolsinthehospitalqualitativesystematicreview |