Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis
BackgroundEndoscopic resection (ESR) is a novel minimally invasive procedure for superficial tumors. Its safety, efficiency, and outcome for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) less than 5 cm remains unclear compared to laparoscopic resection (LAR) and open resection (ONR). The current...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-11-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.672364/full |
| _version_ | 1819202549247377408 |
|---|---|
| author | Zhen Liu Ziyang Zeng Siwen Ouyang Zimu Zhang Juan Sun Xianze Wang Xin Ye Weiming Kang Jianchun Yu |
| author_facet | Zhen Liu Ziyang Zeng Siwen Ouyang Zimu Zhang Juan Sun Xianze Wang Xin Ye Weiming Kang Jianchun Yu |
| author_sort | Zhen Liu |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BackgroundEndoscopic resection (ESR) is a novel minimally invasive procedure for superficial tumors. Its safety, efficiency, and outcome for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) less than 5 cm remains unclear compared to laparoscopic resection (LAR) and open resection (ONR). The current network meta-analysis aimed to review and analyze the available evidence of this question.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify eligible studies published up to July 6, 2020. The perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes among ESR, LAR, and ONR for gGIST (<5 cm) were estimated through the Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effect model.ResultsFifteen studies with 1,631 patients were included. ESR was associated with a shorter operative time [mean difference, MD: -36; 95% confidence interval, CI (-55, -16)], a higher rate of positive margin [odds ratio, OR: 5.1 × 1010, 95% CI (33, 2.5 × 1032)], and less costs [MD: -1 × 104, 95% CI (-1.6 × 104, -4.4 × 103)] but similar time to resume flatus [MD: 0.52, 95% CI (-0.16, 1.1)] and diet [MD: -3.5, 95% CI (-5.6, -1.6)] compared to LAR. A higher rate of total complications [OR: 11, 95% CI (1.2, 140)] was observed in patients who received ESR compared to patients who received LAR. After excluding perforation from the total complication category, the difference of complication between ESR and LAR disappeared [OR: 0.87, 95% CI (0.22, 2.3)]. The recurrence rate [OR: 1.3, 95% CI (0.40, 4.5)] and disease-free survival [hazard ratio: 1.26, 95% CI (0.60, 2.63)] showed no significant difference between ESR and LAR. ESR was associated with better or equivalent perioperative and long-term outcomes compared to ONR, except for positive margin. A subgroup analysis (<2 and 2–5 cm) showed no significantly different results among these three procedures either.ConclusionESR was shown to be a safe and efficient alternative procedure to both LAR and ONR for gGISTs less than 2 cm and within 2–5 cm, respectively, without worsening the oncologic outcomes. However, preoperative assessment of tumor site is of importance for the determination of procedures regarding the increased incidence of a positive margin related to ESR. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:05:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e281e9a570614861b55243589bcf50c6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2234-943X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:05:47Z |
| publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Oncology |
| spelling | doaj.art-e281e9a570614861b55243589bcf50c62022-12-21T18:00:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-11-011110.3389/fonc.2021.672364672364Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-AnalysisZhen LiuZiyang ZengSiwen OuyangZimu ZhangJuan SunXianze WangXin YeWeiming KangJianchun YuBackgroundEndoscopic resection (ESR) is a novel minimally invasive procedure for superficial tumors. Its safety, efficiency, and outcome for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) less than 5 cm remains unclear compared to laparoscopic resection (LAR) and open resection (ONR). The current network meta-analysis aimed to review and analyze the available evidence of this question.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify eligible studies published up to July 6, 2020. The perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes among ESR, LAR, and ONR for gGIST (<5 cm) were estimated through the Bayesian network meta-analysis with a random-effect model.ResultsFifteen studies with 1,631 patients were included. ESR was associated with a shorter operative time [mean difference, MD: -36; 95% confidence interval, CI (-55, -16)], a higher rate of positive margin [odds ratio, OR: 5.1 × 1010, 95% CI (33, 2.5 × 1032)], and less costs [MD: -1 × 104, 95% CI (-1.6 × 104, -4.4 × 103)] but similar time to resume flatus [MD: 0.52, 95% CI (-0.16, 1.1)] and diet [MD: -3.5, 95% CI (-5.6, -1.6)] compared to LAR. A higher rate of total complications [OR: 11, 95% CI (1.2, 140)] was observed in patients who received ESR compared to patients who received LAR. After excluding perforation from the total complication category, the difference of complication between ESR and LAR disappeared [OR: 0.87, 95% CI (0.22, 2.3)]. The recurrence rate [OR: 1.3, 95% CI (0.40, 4.5)] and disease-free survival [hazard ratio: 1.26, 95% CI (0.60, 2.63)] showed no significant difference between ESR and LAR. ESR was associated with better or equivalent perioperative and long-term outcomes compared to ONR, except for positive margin. A subgroup analysis (<2 and 2–5 cm) showed no significantly different results among these three procedures either.ConclusionESR was shown to be a safe and efficient alternative procedure to both LAR and ONR for gGISTs less than 2 cm and within 2–5 cm, respectively, without worsening the oncologic outcomes. However, preoperative assessment of tumor site is of importance for the determination of procedures regarding the increased incidence of a positive margin related to ESR.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.672364/fullendoscopic resectionlaparoscopic resectionopen resectiongastric gastrointestinal stromal tumornetwork meta-analysis |
| spellingShingle | Zhen Liu Ziyang Zeng Siwen Ouyang Zimu Zhang Juan Sun Xianze Wang Xin Ye Weiming Kang Jianchun Yu Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Frontiers in Oncology endoscopic resection laparoscopic resection open resection gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor network meta-analysis |
| title | Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_full | Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_fullStr | Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_short | Comparison Among Endoscopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Resection for Relatively Small Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (<5 cm): A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_sort | comparison among endoscopic laparoscopic and open resection for relatively small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors 5 cm a bayesian network meta analysis |
| topic | endoscopic resection laparoscopic resection open resection gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor network meta-analysis |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.672364/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zhenliu comparisonamongendoscopiclaparoscopicandopenresectionforrelativelysmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors5cmabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT ziyangzeng comparisonamongendoscopiclaparoscopicandopenresectionforrelativelysmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors5cmabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT siwenouyang comparisonamongendoscopiclaparoscopicandopenresectionforrelativelysmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors5cmabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT zimuzhang comparisonamongendoscopiclaparoscopicandopenresectionforrelativelysmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors5cmabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT juansun comparisonamongendoscopiclaparoscopicandopenresectionforrelativelysmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors5cmabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT xianzewang comparisonamongendoscopiclaparoscopicandopenresectionforrelativelysmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors5cmabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT xinye comparisonamongendoscopiclaparoscopicandopenresectionforrelativelysmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors5cmabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT weimingkang comparisonamongendoscopiclaparoscopicandopenresectionforrelativelysmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors5cmabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis AT jianchunyu comparisonamongendoscopiclaparoscopicandopenresectionforrelativelysmallgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors5cmabayesiannetworkmetaanalysis |