Can Outcomes of a Chat-Based Suicide Prevention Helpline Be Improved by Training Counselors in Motivational Interviewing? A Non-randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveTo examine whether the outcomes of a chat-based suicide-prevention helpline could be improved by training counselors in motivational interviewing (MI).MethodsIn a pre- and post-test design, visitors of a chat-based suicide prevention helpline received either the Five-Phase Model (treatment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wilco Janssen, Jeroen van Raak, Yannick van der Lucht, Wouter van Ballegooijen, Saskia Mérelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Digital Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2022.871841/full
_version_ 1818253521627119616
author Wilco Janssen
Jeroen van Raak
Yannick van der Lucht
Wouter van Ballegooijen
Wouter van Ballegooijen
Saskia Mérelle
author_facet Wilco Janssen
Jeroen van Raak
Yannick van der Lucht
Wouter van Ballegooijen
Wouter van Ballegooijen
Saskia Mérelle
author_sort Wilco Janssen
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveTo examine whether the outcomes of a chat-based suicide-prevention helpline could be improved by training counselors in motivational interviewing (MI).MethodsIn a pre- and post-test design, visitors of a chat-based suicide prevention helpline received either the Five-Phase Model (treatment as usual [TAU]) or MI. They completed a pre- and post-chat questionnaire on several suicide-related risk factors. Linear mixed modeling was used to estimate the effect of the condition. Furthermore, the treatment proficiency of newly trained counselors was assessed using MI-Scope.ResultsA total of 756 visitors and 55 counselors were included in this study. The visitors showed an improvement in suicidal ideation and psychological risk factors after a chat conversation. However, there were no significant differences between the MI and TAU conditions (β = 0.03, 95% CI [−0.23–0.30], p = 0.80). The treatment integrity indices showed that the counselors mostly used MI-consistent techniques but were unable to strategically employ these techniques to evoke enough change talk.ConclusionsMI and TAU led to comparable outcomes in a chat-based suicide prevention helpline. The effectiveness of MI might improve by intensifying or improving the training of counselors, keeping the process of engaging more concise or offering visitors multiple sessions of MI.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T16:41:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e282243999bf4639b2d083fe70d17293
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-253X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T16:41:24Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Digital Health
spelling doaj.art-e282243999bf4639b2d083fe70d172932022-12-22T00:18:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Digital Health2673-253X2022-06-01410.3389/fdgth.2022.871841871841Can Outcomes of a Chat-Based Suicide Prevention Helpline Be Improved by Training Counselors in Motivational Interviewing? A Non-randomized Controlled TrialWilco Janssen0Jeroen van Raak1Yannick van der Lucht2Wouter van Ballegooijen3Wouter van Ballegooijen4Saskia Mérelle5113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, Netherlands113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, Netherlands113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands113 Suicide Prevention, Amsterdam, NetherlandsObjectiveTo examine whether the outcomes of a chat-based suicide-prevention helpline could be improved by training counselors in motivational interviewing (MI).MethodsIn a pre- and post-test design, visitors of a chat-based suicide prevention helpline received either the Five-Phase Model (treatment as usual [TAU]) or MI. They completed a pre- and post-chat questionnaire on several suicide-related risk factors. Linear mixed modeling was used to estimate the effect of the condition. Furthermore, the treatment proficiency of newly trained counselors was assessed using MI-Scope.ResultsA total of 756 visitors and 55 counselors were included in this study. The visitors showed an improvement in suicidal ideation and psychological risk factors after a chat conversation. However, there were no significant differences between the MI and TAU conditions (β = 0.03, 95% CI [−0.23–0.30], p = 0.80). The treatment integrity indices showed that the counselors mostly used MI-consistent techniques but were unable to strategically employ these techniques to evoke enough change talk.ConclusionsMI and TAU led to comparable outcomes in a chat-based suicide prevention helpline. The effectiveness of MI might improve by intensifying or improving the training of counselors, keeping the process of engaging more concise or offering visitors multiple sessions of MI.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2022.871841/fullmotivational interviewing (MI)suicide preventionhelplinetreatment integritytrainingchat
spellingShingle Wilco Janssen
Jeroen van Raak
Yannick van der Lucht
Wouter van Ballegooijen
Wouter van Ballegooijen
Saskia Mérelle
Can Outcomes of a Chat-Based Suicide Prevention Helpline Be Improved by Training Counselors in Motivational Interviewing? A Non-randomized Controlled Trial
Frontiers in Digital Health
motivational interviewing (MI)
suicide prevention
helpline
treatment integrity
training
chat
title Can Outcomes of a Chat-Based Suicide Prevention Helpline Be Improved by Training Counselors in Motivational Interviewing? A Non-randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Can Outcomes of a Chat-Based Suicide Prevention Helpline Be Improved by Training Counselors in Motivational Interviewing? A Non-randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Can Outcomes of a Chat-Based Suicide Prevention Helpline Be Improved by Training Counselors in Motivational Interviewing? A Non-randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Can Outcomes of a Chat-Based Suicide Prevention Helpline Be Improved by Training Counselors in Motivational Interviewing? A Non-randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Can Outcomes of a Chat-Based Suicide Prevention Helpline Be Improved by Training Counselors in Motivational Interviewing? A Non-randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort can outcomes of a chat based suicide prevention helpline be improved by training counselors in motivational interviewing a non randomized controlled trial
topic motivational interviewing (MI)
suicide prevention
helpline
treatment integrity
training
chat
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2022.871841/full
work_keys_str_mv AT wilcojanssen canoutcomesofachatbasedsuicidepreventionhelplinebeimprovedbytrainingcounselorsinmotivationalinterviewinganonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jeroenvanraak canoutcomesofachatbasedsuicidepreventionhelplinebeimprovedbytrainingcounselorsinmotivationalinterviewinganonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yannickvanderlucht canoutcomesofachatbasedsuicidepreventionhelplinebeimprovedbytrainingcounselorsinmotivationalinterviewinganonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT woutervanballegooijen canoutcomesofachatbasedsuicidepreventionhelplinebeimprovedbytrainingcounselorsinmotivationalinterviewinganonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT woutervanballegooijen canoutcomesofachatbasedsuicidepreventionhelplinebeimprovedbytrainingcounselorsinmotivationalinterviewinganonrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT saskiamerelle canoutcomesofachatbasedsuicidepreventionhelplinebeimprovedbytrainingcounselorsinmotivationalinterviewinganonrandomizedcontrolledtrial