Review Evaluation of Simalungun Regency Government Financial Reports

The research aims to evaluate financial report examinations based on Government Regulation No. 4 of 2018 and analyze the quality of financial report examinations in Simalungun Regency. Despite compliance with regulations, the examination process could be more optimal as the review team did not asse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Efri Elsridayani Purba, Dwi Martani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas KH Abdul Chalim, Prodi Ekonomi Syariah 2024-02-01
Series:Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://e-journal.uac.ac.id/index.php/iijse/article/view/2885
_version_ 1827339311633137664
author Efri Elsridayani Purba
Dwi Martani
author_facet Efri Elsridayani Purba
Dwi Martani
author_sort Efri Elsridayani Purba
collection DOAJ
description The research aims to evaluate financial report examinations based on Government Regulation No. 4 of 2018 and analyze the quality of financial report examinations in Simalungun Regency. Despite compliance with regulations, the examination process could be more optimal as the review team did not assess SPI, conducted oral interviews without documented records, lacked questionnaires, and had a limited review period of ten days. This study was prompted by unqualified audit opinions in 2017-2018 and a need for information on obtaining unqualified audit opinions. The qualitative research employed a case study approach with descriptive analysis techniques, gathering data through document examinations, checklists, and interviews. Findings indicate that examining financial reports in Simalungun Regency followed Government Regulation No. 4 of 2018 but could be more optimal. Constraints include low reviewer competence and quantity, limited review time, and inadequate review training. The study concludes that the examination quality can be improved but is hindered by low reviewer competence and quantity, limited review time, and inadequate training. These insights highlight the need to enhance examination processes to ensure financial report reliability and accuracy, with recommendations for further research to explore audit opinions from external and internal perspectives and assess the role of APIP in enhancing financial report quality. These findings provide valuable contributions to financial governance improvement in Simalungun Regency and beyond.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T19:56:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e287af40a4ec4bb1af6a3e739bd13620
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2621-606X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T19:56:30Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Universitas KH Abdul Chalim, Prodi Ekonomi Syariah
record_format Article
series Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics
spelling doaj.art-e287af40a4ec4bb1af6a3e739bd136202024-02-28T14:32:51ZengUniversitas KH Abdul Chalim, Prodi Ekonomi SyariahIndonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics2621-606X2024-02-017110.31538/iijse.v7i1.2885Review Evaluation of Simalungun Regency Government Financial ReportsEfri Elsridayani Purba0Dwi Martani1Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, IndonesiaUniversitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia The research aims to evaluate financial report examinations based on Government Regulation No. 4 of 2018 and analyze the quality of financial report examinations in Simalungun Regency. Despite compliance with regulations, the examination process could be more optimal as the review team did not assess SPI, conducted oral interviews without documented records, lacked questionnaires, and had a limited review period of ten days. This study was prompted by unqualified audit opinions in 2017-2018 and a need for information on obtaining unqualified audit opinions. The qualitative research employed a case study approach with descriptive analysis techniques, gathering data through document examinations, checklists, and interviews. Findings indicate that examining financial reports in Simalungun Regency followed Government Regulation No. 4 of 2018 but could be more optimal. Constraints include low reviewer competence and quantity, limited review time, and inadequate review training. The study concludes that the examination quality can be improved but is hindered by low reviewer competence and quantity, limited review time, and inadequate training. These insights highlight the need to enhance examination processes to ensure financial report reliability and accuracy, with recommendations for further research to explore audit opinions from external and internal perspectives and assess the role of APIP in enhancing financial report quality. These findings provide valuable contributions to financial governance improvement in Simalungun Regency and beyond. https://e-journal.uac.ac.id/index.php/iijse/article/view/2885Financial Report Review, Competence, Time, Quality of Financial Statements
spellingShingle Efri Elsridayani Purba
Dwi Martani
Review Evaluation of Simalungun Regency Government Financial Reports
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics
Financial Report Review, Competence, Time, Quality of Financial Statements
title Review Evaluation of Simalungun Regency Government Financial Reports
title_full Review Evaluation of Simalungun Regency Government Financial Reports
title_fullStr Review Evaluation of Simalungun Regency Government Financial Reports
title_full_unstemmed Review Evaluation of Simalungun Regency Government Financial Reports
title_short Review Evaluation of Simalungun Regency Government Financial Reports
title_sort review evaluation of simalungun regency government financial reports
topic Financial Report Review, Competence, Time, Quality of Financial Statements
url https://e-journal.uac.ac.id/index.php/iijse/article/view/2885
work_keys_str_mv AT efrielsridayanipurba reviewevaluationofsimalungunregencygovernmentfinancialreports
AT dwimartani reviewevaluationofsimalungunregencygovernmentfinancialreports