The reinstrumentalization of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (<i>DSM</i>) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis

AbstractResearch instruments play significant roles in the construction of scientific knowledge, even though we have only acquired very limited knowledge about their life cycles from quantitative studies. This paper aims to address this gap by quantitatively examining the citation co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kai Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The MIT Press 2021-01-01
Series:Quantitative Science Studies
Online Access:https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/2/2/678/96158/The-reinstrumentalization-of-the-Diagnostic-and
_version_ 1828845263102410752
author Kai Li
author_facet Kai Li
author_sort Kai Li
collection DOAJ
description AbstractResearch instruments play significant roles in the construction of scientific knowledge, even though we have only acquired very limited knowledge about their life cycles from quantitative studies. This paper aims to address this gap by quantitatively examining the citation contexts of an exemplary research instrument, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in full-text psychological publications. We investigated the relationship between the citation contexts of the DSM and its status as a valid instrument being used and described by psychological researchers. We specifically focused on how this relationship has changed over the DSM’s citation histories, especially through the temporal framework of its versions. We found that a new version of the DSM is increasingly regarded as a valid instrument after its publication; this is reflected in various key citation contexts, such as the use of hedges, attention markers, and the verb profile in sentences where the DSM is cited. We call this process the reinstrumentalization of the DSM in the space of scientific publications. Our findings bridge an important gap between quantitative and qualitative science studies and shed light on an aspect of the social process of scientific instrument development that is not addressed by the current qualitative literature.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T21:24:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e292980788eb4cf498ffdff9ef432b58
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2641-3337
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T21:24:30Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher The MIT Press
record_format Article
series Quantitative Science Studies
spelling doaj.art-e292980788eb4cf498ffdff9ef432b582022-12-22T00:11:30ZengThe MIT PressQuantitative Science Studies2641-33372021-01-012267869710.1162/qss_a_00124The reinstrumentalization of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (<i>DSM</i>) in psychological publications: A citation context analysisKai Li0http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7264-365XSchool of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China AbstractResearch instruments play significant roles in the construction of scientific knowledge, even though we have only acquired very limited knowledge about their life cycles from quantitative studies. This paper aims to address this gap by quantitatively examining the citation contexts of an exemplary research instrument, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in full-text psychological publications. We investigated the relationship between the citation contexts of the DSM and its status as a valid instrument being used and described by psychological researchers. We specifically focused on how this relationship has changed over the DSM’s citation histories, especially through the temporal framework of its versions. We found that a new version of the DSM is increasingly regarded as a valid instrument after its publication; this is reflected in various key citation contexts, such as the use of hedges, attention markers, and the verb profile in sentences where the DSM is cited. We call this process the reinstrumentalization of the DSM in the space of scientific publications. Our findings bridge an important gap between quantitative and qualitative science studies and shed light on an aspect of the social process of scientific instrument development that is not addressed by the current qualitative literature.https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/2/2/678/96158/The-reinstrumentalization-of-the-Diagnostic-and
spellingShingle Kai Li
The reinstrumentalization of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (<i>DSM</i>) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis
Quantitative Science Studies
title The reinstrumentalization of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (<i>DSM</i>) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis
title_full The reinstrumentalization of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (<i>DSM</i>) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis
title_fullStr The reinstrumentalization of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (<i>DSM</i>) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis
title_full_unstemmed The reinstrumentalization of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (<i>DSM</i>) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis
title_short The reinstrumentalization of the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (<i>DSM</i>) in psychological publications: A citation context analysis
title_sort reinstrumentalization of the i diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders i i dsm i in psychological publications a citation context analysis
url https://direct.mit.edu/qss/article/2/2/678/96158/The-reinstrumentalization-of-the-Diagnostic-and
work_keys_str_mv AT kaili thereinstrumentalizationoftheidiagnosticandstatisticalmanualofmentaldisordersiidsmiinpsychologicalpublicationsacitationcontextanalysis
AT kaili reinstrumentalizationoftheidiagnosticandstatisticalmanualofmentaldisordersiidsmiinpsychologicalpublicationsacitationcontextanalysis