Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training

Abstract Background Compared with other cancers, melanoma has the longest delays measured as the median time to patient presentation for care from symptom onset. Time to presentation for care is a key determinant of outcomes, including disease stage, prognosis, and treatment. Methods Melanoma surviv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: June K. Robinson, Racheal Reavy, Kimberly A. Mallett, Rob Turrisi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3299
_version_ 1797839426101968896
author June K. Robinson
Racheal Reavy
Kimberly A. Mallett
Rob Turrisi
author_facet June K. Robinson
Racheal Reavy
Kimberly A. Mallett
Rob Turrisi
author_sort June K. Robinson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Compared with other cancers, melanoma has the longest delays measured as the median time to patient presentation for care from symptom onset. Time to presentation for care is a key determinant of outcomes, including disease stage, prognosis, and treatment. Methods Melanoma survivors with localized disease and their skin check partners enrolled in two sequential randomized control trials of skin self‐examination (SSE) training. In Phase 1, the pair read a workbook in the office and had quarterly total body skin examinations with a study dermatologist. In Phase 2, materials were mailed to pairs, whose surveillance was with a community physician. SSE knowledge, performance (frequency and extent), and identification of concerning moles were compared between phases. Results Among 341 patients, 197 received the workbook and the others were controls. Knowledge in performing SSE was higher for the workbook relative to controls in both phases. The SSE frequency ranged from 2.38 to 5.97 times in 9 months. Patients randomized to the workbook in both phases performed significantly more SSE than controls at 9 months (P < .05). In both phases, trained survivors performed significantly more SSEs on the scalp than controls at 9 and 18 months (P < .05). Phase 1 survivors performed significantly more SSEs on the abdomen, buttocks, and soles of the feet than controls, but this did not occur in Phase 2. Finally, in both phases, survivors trained with the workbook resulted in greater detection of suspicious lesions and melanomas. Conclusions These findings justify the benefits of remote SSE training for patients as an adjunct to provider‐administered screening.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:57:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e299d9e864144b3b8943076416a24457
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-7634
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:57:48Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Cancer Medicine
spelling doaj.art-e299d9e864144b3b8943076416a244572023-04-25T14:00:49ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342020-10-019197301730910.1002/cam4.3299Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person trainingJune K. Robinson0Racheal Reavy1Kimberly A. Mallett2Rob Turrisi3Department of Dermatology Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL USABiobehavioral Health and Prevention Research Center The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USABiobehavioral Health and Prevention Research Center The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USABiobehavioral Health and Prevention Research Center The Pennsylvania State University University Park PA USAAbstract Background Compared with other cancers, melanoma has the longest delays measured as the median time to patient presentation for care from symptom onset. Time to presentation for care is a key determinant of outcomes, including disease stage, prognosis, and treatment. Methods Melanoma survivors with localized disease and their skin check partners enrolled in two sequential randomized control trials of skin self‐examination (SSE) training. In Phase 1, the pair read a workbook in the office and had quarterly total body skin examinations with a study dermatologist. In Phase 2, materials were mailed to pairs, whose surveillance was with a community physician. SSE knowledge, performance (frequency and extent), and identification of concerning moles were compared between phases. Results Among 341 patients, 197 received the workbook and the others were controls. Knowledge in performing SSE was higher for the workbook relative to controls in both phases. The SSE frequency ranged from 2.38 to 5.97 times in 9 months. Patients randomized to the workbook in both phases performed significantly more SSE than controls at 9 months (P < .05). In both phases, trained survivors performed significantly more SSEs on the scalp than controls at 9 and 18 months (P < .05). Phase 1 survivors performed significantly more SSEs on the abdomen, buttocks, and soles of the feet than controls, but this did not occur in Phase 2. Finally, in both phases, survivors trained with the workbook resulted in greater detection of suspicious lesions and melanomas. Conclusions These findings justify the benefits of remote SSE training for patients as an adjunct to provider‐administered screening.https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3299melanoma survivorsremote trainingskin self‐examination
spellingShingle June K. Robinson
Racheal Reavy
Kimberly A. Mallett
Rob Turrisi
Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
Cancer Medicine
melanoma survivors
remote training
skin self‐examination
title Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_full Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_fullStr Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_full_unstemmed Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_short Remote skin self‐examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners: A randomized trial and comparison with in‐person training
title_sort remote skin self examination training of melanoma survivors and their skin check partners a randomized trial and comparison with in person training
topic melanoma survivors
remote training
skin self‐examination
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3299
work_keys_str_mv AT junekrobinson remoteskinselfexaminationtrainingofmelanomasurvivorsandtheirskincheckpartnersarandomizedtrialandcomparisonwithinpersontraining
AT rachealreavy remoteskinselfexaminationtrainingofmelanomasurvivorsandtheirskincheckpartnersarandomizedtrialandcomparisonwithinpersontraining
AT kimberlyamallett remoteskinselfexaminationtrainingofmelanomasurvivorsandtheirskincheckpartnersarandomizedtrialandcomparisonwithinpersontraining
AT robturrisi remoteskinselfexaminationtrainingofmelanomasurvivorsandtheirskincheckpartnersarandomizedtrialandcomparisonwithinpersontraining