Qualitative Sprünge in der Qualitätssicherung? Potenziale digitaler Open-Peer-Review-Formate
Open Access is still met with mixed reactions and hesitation from scholars in the humanities. In particular, a lack of quality assurance is often assumed. But quite the opposite is true, at least when the idea of openness is thoroughly a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Forschungsverbund Marbach Weimar Wolfenbüttel / Verband Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum e.V.
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.zfdg.de/node/326 |
| _version_ | 1826993893559762944 |
|---|---|
| author | Yuliya Fadeeva |
| author_facet | Yuliya Fadeeva |
| author_sort | Yuliya Fadeeva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Open Access is still met with mixed reactions and hesitation from scholars in
the humanities. In particular, a lack of quality assurance is often assumed.
But quite the opposite is true, at least when the idea of openness is
thoroughly applied to quality assurance processes and procedures. By opening up
and digitising the peer review process, significant improvements in the quality
of works in the humanities become possible. It also becomes clear how the
concept of academic work is changing through the movements inside traditional
publication practices. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T01:46:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e2b0fef0a203424c94f113f1d836bb1e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2510-1358 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-18T09:11:16Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | Forschungsverbund Marbach Weimar Wolfenbüttel / Verband Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum e.V. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften |
| spelling | doaj.art-e2b0fef0a203424c94f113f1d836bb1e2024-11-02T23:15:07ZdeuForschungsverbund Marbach Weimar Wolfenbüttel / Verband Digital Humanities im deutschsprachigen Raum e.V.Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften2510-13582021-09-015210.17175/sb005_0021764799623Qualitative Sprünge in der Qualitätssicherung? Potenziale digitaler Open-Peer-Review-FormateYuliya Fadeevahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3119-7892Open Access is still met with mixed reactions and hesitation from scholars in the humanities. In particular, a lack of quality assurance is often assumed. But quite the opposite is true, at least when the idea of openness is thoroughly applied to quality assurance processes and procedures. By opening up and digitising the peer review process, significant improvements in the quality of works in the humanities become possible. It also becomes clear how the concept of academic work is changing through the movements inside traditional publication practices.https://www.zfdg.de/node/326digital humanities peer review open access qualitätssicherung wissenschaftskommunikation |
| spellingShingle | Yuliya Fadeeva Qualitative Sprünge in der Qualitätssicherung? Potenziale digitaler Open-Peer-Review-Formate Zeitschrift für digitale Geisteswissenschaften digital humanities peer review open access qualitätssicherung wissenschaftskommunikation |
| title | Qualitative Sprünge in der Qualitätssicherung? Potenziale
digitaler Open-Peer-Review-Formate |
| title_full | Qualitative Sprünge in der Qualitätssicherung? Potenziale
digitaler Open-Peer-Review-Formate |
| title_fullStr | Qualitative Sprünge in der Qualitätssicherung? Potenziale
digitaler Open-Peer-Review-Formate |
| title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative Sprünge in der Qualitätssicherung? Potenziale
digitaler Open-Peer-Review-Formate |
| title_short | Qualitative Sprünge in der Qualitätssicherung? Potenziale
digitaler Open-Peer-Review-Formate |
| title_sort | qualitative sprunge in der qualitatssicherung potenziale digitaler open peer review formate |
| topic | digital humanities peer review open access qualitätssicherung wissenschaftskommunikation |
| url | https://www.zfdg.de/node/326 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yuliyafadeeva qualitativesprungeinderqualitatssicherungpotenzialedigitaleropenpeerreviewformate |