Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

<h4>Background</h4>Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the advantages or disadvantages of spironolactone use in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This study aimed to evaluate survival according to the use of spironolactone in a large sample of patients unde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seok Hui Kang, Bo Yeon Kim, Eun Jung Son, Gui Ok Kim, Jun Young Do
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301458&type=printable
_version_ 1827293889016365056
author Seok Hui Kang
Bo Yeon Kim
Eun Jung Son
Gui Ok Kim
Jun Young Do
author_facet Seok Hui Kang
Bo Yeon Kim
Eun Jung Son
Gui Ok Kim
Jun Young Do
author_sort Seok Hui Kang
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the advantages or disadvantages of spironolactone use in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This study aimed to evaluate survival according to the use of spironolactone in a large sample of patients undergoing maintenance HD.<h4>Methods</h4>This retrospective study used laboratory and clinical data from the national HD Quality Assessment Program and claims data. The participants of the quality assessment program were patients who had been undergoing maintenance HD for ≥ 3 months, patients undergoing HD at least twice a week. Patients with no spironolactone prescription during the assessment periods were designated as the control group. Patients with one or more prescriptions of spironolactone during the assessment periods were assigned to the SPR group.<h4>Results</h4>The number of patients in the control and SPR groups were 54,588 and 315, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 69.1% and 59.1% in the control and SPR groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses showed that the hazard ratio in the SPR group was 1.34 (P < 0.001) in univariate analysis and 1.13 (P = 0.249) in multivariable analysis. Univariate Cox-regression analysis showed a better patient survival rate in the control group than in the SPR group; however, multivariable analyses showed similar patient survival rates between the two groups.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This study showed no difference in survival between patients undergoing HD with and without spironolactone use.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T13:47:38Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e2b977b87f4742e0acce761e21b7a912
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T13:47:38Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-e2b977b87f4742e0acce761e21b7a9122024-04-04T05:34:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-01193e030145810.1371/journal.pone.0301458Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.Seok Hui KangBo Yeon KimEun Jung SonGui Ok KimJun Young Do<h4>Background</h4>Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding the advantages or disadvantages of spironolactone use in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). This study aimed to evaluate survival according to the use of spironolactone in a large sample of patients undergoing maintenance HD.<h4>Methods</h4>This retrospective study used laboratory and clinical data from the national HD Quality Assessment Program and claims data. The participants of the quality assessment program were patients who had been undergoing maintenance HD for ≥ 3 months, patients undergoing HD at least twice a week. Patients with no spironolactone prescription during the assessment periods were designated as the control group. Patients with one or more prescriptions of spironolactone during the assessment periods were assigned to the SPR group.<h4>Results</h4>The number of patients in the control and SPR groups were 54,588 and 315, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 69.1% and 59.1% in the control and SPR groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Cox regression analyses showed that the hazard ratio in the SPR group was 1.34 (P < 0.001) in univariate analysis and 1.13 (P = 0.249) in multivariable analysis. Univariate Cox-regression analysis showed a better patient survival rate in the control group than in the SPR group; however, multivariable analyses showed similar patient survival rates between the two groups.<h4>Conclusion</h4>This study showed no difference in survival between patients undergoing HD with and without spironolactone use.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301458&type=printable
spellingShingle Seok Hui Kang
Bo Yeon Kim
Eun Jung Son
Gui Ok Kim
Jun Young Do
Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
PLoS ONE
title Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
title_full Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
title_fullStr Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
title_full_unstemmed Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
title_short Effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
title_sort effect of spironolactone on survival in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0301458&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT seokhuikang effectofspironolactoneonsurvivalinpatientsundergoingmaintenancehemodialysis
AT boyeonkim effectofspironolactoneonsurvivalinpatientsundergoingmaintenancehemodialysis
AT eunjungson effectofspironolactoneonsurvivalinpatientsundergoingmaintenancehemodialysis
AT guiokkim effectofspironolactoneonsurvivalinpatientsundergoingmaintenancehemodialysis
AT junyoungdo effectofspironolactoneonsurvivalinpatientsundergoingmaintenancehemodialysis