Coastal Typology: An Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Relationship between Socioeconomic Development and Shoreline Change
Globally, coastal communities are impacted by hazards including storm events, rising water levels, and associated coastal erosion. These hazards destroy homes and infrastructure causing human and financial risks for communities. At the same time, the economic and governance capacity of these communi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Land |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/7/218 |
_version_ | 1827713726136975360 |
---|---|
author | Elizabeth A. Mack Ethan Theuerkauf Erin Bunting |
author_facet | Elizabeth A. Mack Ethan Theuerkauf Erin Bunting |
author_sort | Elizabeth A. Mack |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Globally, coastal communities are impacted by hazards including storm events, rising water levels, and associated coastal erosion. These hazards destroy homes and infrastructure causing human and financial risks for communities. At the same time, the economic and governance capacity of these communities varies widely, impacting their ability to plan and adapt to hazards. In order to identify locations vulnerable to coastal hazards, knowledge of the physical coastal changes must be integrated with the socio-economic profiles of communities. To do this, we couple information about coastal erosion rates and economic data in communities along the Great Lakes to develop a typology that summarizes physical and economic vulnerability to coastal erosion. This typology classifies communities into one of four categories: (1) High physical and economic vulnerability to coastal erosion, (2) High physical but low economic vulnerability to coastal erosion, (3) Low physical and low economic vulnerability to coastal erosion, and (4) High economic but low physical vulnerability to coastal erosion. An analysis of this typology over three time periods (2005–2010), (2010–2014), and (2014–2018) reveals the dynamic nature of vulnerability over this fourteen year time span. Given this complexity, it can be difficult for managers and decision-makers to decide where to direct limited resources for coastal protection. Our typology provides an analytical tool to proactively address this challenge. Further, it advances existing work on coastal change and associated vulnerability in three ways. One, it implements a regional, analytical approach that moves beyond case study-oriented work and facilitates community analyses in a comparative context. Two, the typology provides an integrated assessment of vulnerability that considers economic vulnerability to coastal erosion, which is a contextual variable that compounds or helps mitigate vulnerability. Three, the typology facilitates community comparisons over time, which is important to identifying drivers of change in Great Lakes coastal communities over time and community efforts to mitigate and adapt to these hazards. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T18:42:00Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e2bb13617c6242d6a80017089990ee1f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-445X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T18:42:00Z |
publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Land |
spelling | doaj.art-e2bb13617c6242d6a80017089990ee1f2023-11-20T05:51:03ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2020-07-019721810.3390/land9070218Coastal Typology: An Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Relationship between Socioeconomic Development and Shoreline ChangeElizabeth A. Mack0Ethan Theuerkauf1Erin Bunting2Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USADepartment of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USADepartment of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, USAGlobally, coastal communities are impacted by hazards including storm events, rising water levels, and associated coastal erosion. These hazards destroy homes and infrastructure causing human and financial risks for communities. At the same time, the economic and governance capacity of these communities varies widely, impacting their ability to plan and adapt to hazards. In order to identify locations vulnerable to coastal hazards, knowledge of the physical coastal changes must be integrated with the socio-economic profiles of communities. To do this, we couple information about coastal erosion rates and economic data in communities along the Great Lakes to develop a typology that summarizes physical and economic vulnerability to coastal erosion. This typology classifies communities into one of four categories: (1) High physical and economic vulnerability to coastal erosion, (2) High physical but low economic vulnerability to coastal erosion, (3) Low physical and low economic vulnerability to coastal erosion, and (4) High economic but low physical vulnerability to coastal erosion. An analysis of this typology over three time periods (2005–2010), (2010–2014), and (2014–2018) reveals the dynamic nature of vulnerability over this fourteen year time span. Given this complexity, it can be difficult for managers and decision-makers to decide where to direct limited resources for coastal protection. Our typology provides an analytical tool to proactively address this challenge. Further, it advances existing work on coastal change and associated vulnerability in three ways. One, it implements a regional, analytical approach that moves beyond case study-oriented work and facilitates community analyses in a comparative context. Two, the typology provides an integrated assessment of vulnerability that considers economic vulnerability to coastal erosion, which is a contextual variable that compounds or helps mitigate vulnerability. Three, the typology facilitates community comparisons over time, which is important to identifying drivers of change in Great Lakes coastal communities over time and community efforts to mitigate and adapt to these hazards.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/7/218community vulnerabilitycoastal hazarderosionrisk assessmentGreat Lakescoastal resilience |
spellingShingle | Elizabeth A. Mack Ethan Theuerkauf Erin Bunting Coastal Typology: An Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Relationship between Socioeconomic Development and Shoreline Change Land community vulnerability coastal hazard erosion risk assessment Great Lakes coastal resilience |
title | Coastal Typology: An Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Relationship between Socioeconomic Development and Shoreline Change |
title_full | Coastal Typology: An Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Relationship between Socioeconomic Development and Shoreline Change |
title_fullStr | Coastal Typology: An Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Relationship between Socioeconomic Development and Shoreline Change |
title_full_unstemmed | Coastal Typology: An Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Relationship between Socioeconomic Development and Shoreline Change |
title_short | Coastal Typology: An Analysis of the Spatiotemporal Relationship between Socioeconomic Development and Shoreline Change |
title_sort | coastal typology an analysis of the spatiotemporal relationship between socioeconomic development and shoreline change |
topic | community vulnerability coastal hazard erosion risk assessment Great Lakes coastal resilience |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/9/7/218 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elizabethamack coastaltypologyananalysisofthespatiotemporalrelationshipbetweensocioeconomicdevelopmentandshorelinechange AT ethantheuerkauf coastaltypologyananalysisofthespatiotemporalrelationshipbetweensocioeconomicdevelopmentandshorelinechange AT erinbunting coastaltypologyananalysisofthespatiotemporalrelationshipbetweensocioeconomicdevelopmentandshorelinechange |