Pendelegasian Wewenang Pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh Undang-Undang

There is an unclear formulation in Article 10 paragraph (1) letter b of Act Number 12 of 2011 as amended by Act Number 15 of 2019, that the act can delegate the authority to form acts. This is contrary to Hans Kelsen's theory, namely legal norms accept delegation from norms that are considered...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lovika Augusta Purwaningtyas, Bayu Dwi Anggono, A'an Efendi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Jember 2023-05-01
Series:Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities
Online Access:https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/idj/article/view/31841
_version_ 1827397922213330944
author Lovika Augusta Purwaningtyas
Bayu Dwi Anggono
A'an Efendi
author_facet Lovika Augusta Purwaningtyas
Bayu Dwi Anggono
A'an Efendi
author_sort Lovika Augusta Purwaningtyas
collection DOAJ
description There is an unclear formulation in Article 10 paragraph (1) letter b of Act Number 12 of 2011 as amended by Act Number 15 of 2019, that the act can delegate the authority to form acts. This is contrary to Hans Kelsen's theory, namely legal norms accept delegation from norms that are considered valid or have a higher hierarchy, in other words the legal norms contained in the P3 Act cannot get validity. The purpose of this study is related to the main problem, namely conducting a study to find and analyze the delegation of authority to form Acts by Act. The type of research in this legal research is normative juridical research. Normative legal research or doctrinal legal research uses three problem approaches, namely the legal approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach with the Netherlands and France. Based on the above thinking, the author uses a normative legal research method. In the discussion the author finds that the Act cannot delegate the authority to form Acts, because it is contrary to the principle of lex superior derogat legi inferiori, in the legal politics of delegating the formation of legislation there is also nothing that explains that this can be enforced. These problems include the delegation of authority to form acts by act, causing many polemics, namely the occurrence of overlapping and disharmony of acts with one another, and the occurrence of over-regulation in the acts and regulations in Indonesia.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T19:19:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e2cc77cfe0e845f38a800469caa8ed3c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2775-5045
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T19:19:00Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Universitas Jember
record_format Article
series Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities
spelling doaj.art-e2cc77cfe0e845f38a800469caa8ed3c2023-12-26T22:53:45ZengUniversitas JemberInterdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities2775-50452023-05-0141214010.19184/idj.v4i1.3184131841Pendelegasian Wewenang Pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh Undang-UndangLovika Augusta Purwaningtyas0Bayu Dwi Anggono1A'an Efendi2Universitas Jember, IndonesiaUniversitas Jember, IndonesiaUniversitas Jember, IndonesiaThere is an unclear formulation in Article 10 paragraph (1) letter b of Act Number 12 of 2011 as amended by Act Number 15 of 2019, that the act can delegate the authority to form acts. This is contrary to Hans Kelsen's theory, namely legal norms accept delegation from norms that are considered valid or have a higher hierarchy, in other words the legal norms contained in the P3 Act cannot get validity. The purpose of this study is related to the main problem, namely conducting a study to find and analyze the delegation of authority to form Acts by Act. The type of research in this legal research is normative juridical research. Normative legal research or doctrinal legal research uses three problem approaches, namely the legal approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach with the Netherlands and France. Based on the above thinking, the author uses a normative legal research method. In the discussion the author finds that the Act cannot delegate the authority to form Acts, because it is contrary to the principle of lex superior derogat legi inferiori, in the legal politics of delegating the formation of legislation there is also nothing that explains that this can be enforced. These problems include the delegation of authority to form acts by act, causing many polemics, namely the occurrence of overlapping and disharmony of acts with one another, and the occurrence of over-regulation in the acts and regulations in Indonesia.https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/idj/article/view/31841
spellingShingle Lovika Augusta Purwaningtyas
Bayu Dwi Anggono
A'an Efendi
Pendelegasian Wewenang Pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh Undang-Undang
Interdisciplinary Journal on Law, Social Sciences and Humanities
title Pendelegasian Wewenang Pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh Undang-Undang
title_full Pendelegasian Wewenang Pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh Undang-Undang
title_fullStr Pendelegasian Wewenang Pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh Undang-Undang
title_full_unstemmed Pendelegasian Wewenang Pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh Undang-Undang
title_short Pendelegasian Wewenang Pembentukan Undang-Undang oleh Undang-Undang
title_sort pendelegasian wewenang pembentukan undang undang oleh undang undang
url https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/idj/article/view/31841
work_keys_str_mv AT lovikaaugustapurwaningtyas pendelegasianwewenangpembentukanundangundangolehundangundang
AT bayudwianggono pendelegasianwewenangpembentukanundangundangolehundangundang
AT aanefendi pendelegasianwewenangpembentukanundangundangolehundangundang