Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .al

Abstract An evaluation of Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) was recently conducted by San Sebastian et al. (BMC Public Health 19:202, 2019). Evaluation of health care interventions of this kind require 1) an understanding of both the design and the nature of the intervention, 2) correct defi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yulia Blomstedt, Margareta Norberg, Nawi Ng, Lennarth Nyström, Kurt Boman, Göran Lönnberg, Hans Stenlund, Stig Wall, Lars Weinehall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-7444-3
_version_ 1819157823762726912
author Yulia Blomstedt
Margareta Norberg
Nawi Ng
Lennarth Nyström
Kurt Boman
Göran Lönnberg
Hans Stenlund
Stig Wall
Lars Weinehall
author_facet Yulia Blomstedt
Margareta Norberg
Nawi Ng
Lennarth Nyström
Kurt Boman
Göran Lönnberg
Hans Stenlund
Stig Wall
Lars Weinehall
author_sort Yulia Blomstedt
collection DOAJ
description Abstract An evaluation of Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) was recently conducted by San Sebastian et al. (BMC Public Health 19:202, 2019). Evaluation of health care interventions of this kind require 1) an understanding of both the design and the nature of the intervention, 2) correct definition of the target population, and 3) careful choice of the appropriate evaluation method. In this correspondence, we review the approach used by San Sebastian et al. as relates to these three criteria. Within this framework, we suggest important explanations for why the conclusions drawn by these authors contradict a large body of research on the effectiveness of the VIP.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T16:14:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e2d91409549d4865be18b6034c6b079e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T16:14:53Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-e2d91409549d4865be18b6034c6b079e2022-12-21T18:20:24ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582019-08-011911310.1186/s12889-019-7444-3Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .alYulia Blomstedt0Margareta Norberg1Nawi Ng2Lennarth Nyström3Kurt Boman4Göran Lönnberg5Hans Stenlund6Stig Wall7Lars Weinehall8Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå UniversityAbstract An evaluation of Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) was recently conducted by San Sebastian et al. (BMC Public Health 19:202, 2019). Evaluation of health care interventions of this kind require 1) an understanding of both the design and the nature of the intervention, 2) correct definition of the target population, and 3) careful choice of the appropriate evaluation method. In this correspondence, we review the approach used by San Sebastian et al. as relates to these three criteria. Within this framework, we suggest important explanations for why the conclusions drawn by these authors contradict a large body of research on the effectiveness of the VIP.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-7444-3PreventionCommunity interventionEvaluationCVD
spellingShingle Yulia Blomstedt
Margareta Norberg
Nawi Ng
Lennarth Nyström
Kurt Boman
Göran Lönnberg
Hans Stenlund
Stig Wall
Lars Weinehall
Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .al
BMC Public Health
Prevention
Community intervention
Evaluation
CVD
title Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .al
title_full Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .al
title_fullStr Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .al
title_full_unstemmed Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .al
title_short Flawed conclusions on the Västerbotten Intervention Program by San Sebastian et .al
title_sort flawed conclusions on the vasterbotten intervention program by san sebastian et al
topic Prevention
Community intervention
Evaluation
CVD
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-019-7444-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yuliablomstedt flawedconclusionsonthevasterbotteninterventionprogrambysansebastianetal
AT margaretanorberg flawedconclusionsonthevasterbotteninterventionprogrambysansebastianetal
AT nawing flawedconclusionsonthevasterbotteninterventionprogrambysansebastianetal
AT lennarthnystrom flawedconclusionsonthevasterbotteninterventionprogrambysansebastianetal
AT kurtboman flawedconclusionsonthevasterbotteninterventionprogrambysansebastianetal
AT goranlonnberg flawedconclusionsonthevasterbotteninterventionprogrambysansebastianetal
AT hansstenlund flawedconclusionsonthevasterbotteninterventionprogrambysansebastianetal
AT stigwall flawedconclusionsonthevasterbotteninterventionprogrambysansebastianetal
AT larsweinehall flawedconclusionsonthevasterbotteninterventionprogrambysansebastianetal