Co-Seismic Inversion and Post-Seismic Deformation Mechanism Analysis of 2019 California Earthquake

In July 2019, a series of seismic events, including a magnitude (Mw) 7.1 mainshock and Mw 6.4 foreshock, occurred in Eastern California. Studying these seismic events can significantly improve our understanding of the Eastern California tectonic environment. Sentinel-1A and ALOS-2 PALSAR images were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chengsheng Yang, Ting Wang, Sainan Zhu, Bingquan Han, Jihong Dong, Chaoying Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/4/608
_version_ 1797412601597001728
author Chengsheng Yang
Ting Wang
Sainan Zhu
Bingquan Han
Jihong Dong
Chaoying Zhao
author_facet Chengsheng Yang
Ting Wang
Sainan Zhu
Bingquan Han
Jihong Dong
Chaoying Zhao
author_sort Chengsheng Yang
collection DOAJ
description In July 2019, a series of seismic events, including a magnitude (Mw) 7.1 mainshock and Mw 6.4 foreshock, occurred in Eastern California. Studying these seismic events can significantly improve our understanding of the Eastern California tectonic environment. Sentinel-1A and ALOS-2 PALSAR images were utilized to obtain co-seismic deformation fields, including mainshock and foreshock deformation. The Okada elastic dislocation model and ascending and descending orbit results were used to invert the co-seismic slip distribution and obtain a co-seismic focal mechanism solution. Using ascending Sentinel-1A images, a time-series deformation was obtained for 402 d after the earthquake, and the deformation evolution mechanism was analyzed. The maximum uplift caused by the co-seismic mechanism reached 1.5 m in the line of sight (LOS), and the maximum subsidence reached 1 m in the LOS. For 402 d after the earthquake, the area remained active, and its deformation was dominated by after-slip. The co-seismic inversion results illustrated that California earthquakes were mainly strike-slip. The co-seismic inversion magnitude was approximately Mw 7.08. The Coulomb stress change illustrated that the seismic moment caused by the co-seismic slip was 4.24 × 10<sup>26</sup> N × m, which is approximately Mw 7.06. This finding is consistent with the co-seismic slip distribution inversion results.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:04:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e2dc607a31174b2aa6dbc14b0d7b0661
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:04:31Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-e2dc607a31174b2aa6dbc14b0d7b06612023-12-03T12:56:19ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-02-0113460810.3390/rs13040608Co-Seismic Inversion and Post-Seismic Deformation Mechanism Analysis of 2019 California EarthquakeChengsheng Yang0Ting Wang1Sainan Zhu2Bingquan Han3Jihong Dong4Chaoying Zhao5College of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, ChinaCollege of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, ChinaChina Institute of Geo-Environment Monitoring, Beijing 100081, ChinaCollege of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, ChinaCollege of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, ChinaCollege of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, ChinaIn July 2019, a series of seismic events, including a magnitude (Mw) 7.1 mainshock and Mw 6.4 foreshock, occurred in Eastern California. Studying these seismic events can significantly improve our understanding of the Eastern California tectonic environment. Sentinel-1A and ALOS-2 PALSAR images were utilized to obtain co-seismic deformation fields, including mainshock and foreshock deformation. The Okada elastic dislocation model and ascending and descending orbit results were used to invert the co-seismic slip distribution and obtain a co-seismic focal mechanism solution. Using ascending Sentinel-1A images, a time-series deformation was obtained for 402 d after the earthquake, and the deformation evolution mechanism was analyzed. The maximum uplift caused by the co-seismic mechanism reached 1.5 m in the line of sight (LOS), and the maximum subsidence reached 1 m in the LOS. For 402 d after the earthquake, the area remained active, and its deformation was dominated by after-slip. The co-seismic inversion results illustrated that California earthquakes were mainly strike-slip. The co-seismic inversion magnitude was approximately Mw 7.08. The Coulomb stress change illustrated that the seismic moment caused by the co-seismic slip was 4.24 × 10<sup>26</sup> N × m, which is approximately Mw 7.06. This finding is consistent with the co-seismic slip distribution inversion results.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/4/608California earthquakeco-seismic deformationpost-seismic deformationslip distributionCoulomb stress
spellingShingle Chengsheng Yang
Ting Wang
Sainan Zhu
Bingquan Han
Jihong Dong
Chaoying Zhao
Co-Seismic Inversion and Post-Seismic Deformation Mechanism Analysis of 2019 California Earthquake
Remote Sensing
California earthquake
co-seismic deformation
post-seismic deformation
slip distribution
Coulomb stress
title Co-Seismic Inversion and Post-Seismic Deformation Mechanism Analysis of 2019 California Earthquake
title_full Co-Seismic Inversion and Post-Seismic Deformation Mechanism Analysis of 2019 California Earthquake
title_fullStr Co-Seismic Inversion and Post-Seismic Deformation Mechanism Analysis of 2019 California Earthquake
title_full_unstemmed Co-Seismic Inversion and Post-Seismic Deformation Mechanism Analysis of 2019 California Earthquake
title_short Co-Seismic Inversion and Post-Seismic Deformation Mechanism Analysis of 2019 California Earthquake
title_sort co seismic inversion and post seismic deformation mechanism analysis of 2019 california earthquake
topic California earthquake
co-seismic deformation
post-seismic deformation
slip distribution
Coulomb stress
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/4/608
work_keys_str_mv AT chengshengyang coseismicinversionandpostseismicdeformationmechanismanalysisof2019californiaearthquake
AT tingwang coseismicinversionandpostseismicdeformationmechanismanalysisof2019californiaearthquake
AT sainanzhu coseismicinversionandpostseismicdeformationmechanismanalysisof2019californiaearthquake
AT bingquanhan coseismicinversionandpostseismicdeformationmechanismanalysisof2019californiaearthquake
AT jihongdong coseismicinversionandpostseismicdeformationmechanismanalysisof2019californiaearthquake
AT chaoyingzhao coseismicinversionandpostseismicdeformationmechanismanalysisof2019californiaearthquake