Analisis Retrofit Lampu Di Kantor Wilayah BRI Denpasar Dengan Metode Life Cycle Cost

Lighting is one of the primary needs of humans wherever they are, because the presence of lighting will greatly help human activities and productivity. The more the number of people the need for lighting also increases. This means that it is directly proportional to electricity needs. In this study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Hari Wijaya, Rukmi Sari Hartati, Wayan Gede Ariastina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Udayana 2019-08-01
Series:Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro
Online Access:https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/49065
_version_ 1818239584371212288
author Muhammad Hari Wijaya
Rukmi Sari Hartati
Wayan Gede Ariastina
author_facet Muhammad Hari Wijaya
Rukmi Sari Hartati
Wayan Gede Ariastina
author_sort Muhammad Hari Wijaya
collection DOAJ
description Lighting is one of the primary needs of humans wherever they are, because the presence of lighting will greatly help human activities and productivity. The more the number of people the need for lighting also increases. This means that it is directly proportional to electricity needs. In this study the calculation of the savings of LED lights was carried out using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) method in BRI Regional Office buildings in Denpasar. As a result, the replacement cost for the Philips brand LED costs Rp.145,093,000.00. Energy saving obtained is equal to 11,309.49 kWh per month, so the bill savings obtained with the electricity tariff per kWH Rp.1,117.00 is Rp.12,632,700.00 every month. The operational cost of LED lights was originally Rp.132,172,421.00 will experience a gradation of inflation rate of 4.2% so that during the life time of the lamp (4 years) it will be a total of Rp.562,939,535.08. The total LED LCC is Rp.708,032,535.08 with a period of 4 (four) years, while the total existing LCC lights are Rp.628,293,771.91 with a period of 2 (two) years. The economic feasibility study using the PBP method shows results that are feasible to be accepted, but for the NPV method, the IRR and PI show results that have not been properly received. Based on calculations using the NPV method and PI, it can be seen that to be a feasible outcome, the initial cost is a maximum of Rp.108,468,555.35.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T12:59:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e2ee3075880648b09864a1047e671fdc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1693-2951
2503-2372
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T12:59:52Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Universitas Udayana
record_format Article
series Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro
spelling doaj.art-e2ee3075880648b09864a1047e671fdc2022-12-22T00:23:48ZengUniversitas UdayanaMajalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro1693-29512503-23722019-08-01182xxxxxxxx10.24843/MITE.2019.v18i02.P2049065Analisis Retrofit Lampu Di Kantor Wilayah BRI Denpasar Dengan Metode Life Cycle CostMuhammad Hari WijayaRukmi Sari HartatiWayan Gede AriastinaLighting is one of the primary needs of humans wherever they are, because the presence of lighting will greatly help human activities and productivity. The more the number of people the need for lighting also increases. This means that it is directly proportional to electricity needs. In this study the calculation of the savings of LED lights was carried out using the Life Cycle Cost (LCC) method in BRI Regional Office buildings in Denpasar. As a result, the replacement cost for the Philips brand LED costs Rp.145,093,000.00. Energy saving obtained is equal to 11,309.49 kWh per month, so the bill savings obtained with the electricity tariff per kWH Rp.1,117.00 is Rp.12,632,700.00 every month. The operational cost of LED lights was originally Rp.132,172,421.00 will experience a gradation of inflation rate of 4.2% so that during the life time of the lamp (4 years) it will be a total of Rp.562,939,535.08. The total LED LCC is Rp.708,032,535.08 with a period of 4 (four) years, while the total existing LCC lights are Rp.628,293,771.91 with a period of 2 (two) years. The economic feasibility study using the PBP method shows results that are feasible to be accepted, but for the NPV method, the IRR and PI show results that have not been properly received. Based on calculations using the NPV method and PI, it can be seen that to be a feasible outcome, the initial cost is a maximum of Rp.108,468,555.35.https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/49065
spellingShingle Muhammad Hari Wijaya
Rukmi Sari Hartati
Wayan Gede Ariastina
Analisis Retrofit Lampu Di Kantor Wilayah BRI Denpasar Dengan Metode Life Cycle Cost
Majalah Ilmiah Teknologi Elektro
title Analisis Retrofit Lampu Di Kantor Wilayah BRI Denpasar Dengan Metode Life Cycle Cost
title_full Analisis Retrofit Lampu Di Kantor Wilayah BRI Denpasar Dengan Metode Life Cycle Cost
title_fullStr Analisis Retrofit Lampu Di Kantor Wilayah BRI Denpasar Dengan Metode Life Cycle Cost
title_full_unstemmed Analisis Retrofit Lampu Di Kantor Wilayah BRI Denpasar Dengan Metode Life Cycle Cost
title_short Analisis Retrofit Lampu Di Kantor Wilayah BRI Denpasar Dengan Metode Life Cycle Cost
title_sort analisis retrofit lampu di kantor wilayah bri denpasar dengan metode life cycle cost
url https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/JTE/article/view/49065
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadhariwijaya analisisretrofitlampudikantorwilayahbridenpasardenganmetodelifecyclecost
AT rukmisarihartati analisisretrofitlampudikantorwilayahbridenpasardenganmetodelifecyclecost
AT wayangedeariastina analisisretrofitlampudikantorwilayahbridenpasardenganmetodelifecyclecost