Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy

One of the biggest challenges for criminal justice educators is to deal with the strongly held opinions and preconceived notions about criminal justice issues among students. It often takes the form of students being reluctant to accept certain premises that does not comply with their own experience...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caroline Mellgren, Anna-Karin Ivert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2016-12-01
Series:Cogent Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1184604
_version_ 1797766621171810304
author Caroline Mellgren
Anna-Karin Ivert
author_facet Caroline Mellgren
Anna-Karin Ivert
author_sort Caroline Mellgren
collection DOAJ
description One of the biggest challenges for criminal justice educators is to deal with the strongly held opinions and preconceived notions about criminal justice issues among students. It often takes the form of students being reluctant to accept certain premises that does not comply with their own experience of the issue. The general tendency to reject information that does not confirm your own view of the world and to accept information that does confirm what you believe to be true is called confirmation bias. This paper proposes the criminal policy debate format as an active learning strategy. Based on the application in an introductory course that is part of a three-year bachelor program in criminology, findings show that the debate format facilitates learning by encouraging students to formulate arguments for and against criminal policy questions.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T20:26:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e2ef6609b18e43f7b3118217ca95c15f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2331-186X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T20:26:51Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Cogent Education
spelling doaj.art-e2ef6609b18e43f7b3118217ca95c15f2023-08-02T00:27:56ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2016-12-013110.1080/2331186X.2016.11846041184604Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategyCaroline Mellgren0Anna-Karin Ivert1Malmö UniversityMalmö UniversityOne of the biggest challenges for criminal justice educators is to deal with the strongly held opinions and preconceived notions about criminal justice issues among students. It often takes the form of students being reluctant to accept certain premises that does not comply with their own experience of the issue. The general tendency to reject information that does not confirm your own view of the world and to accept information that does confirm what you believe to be true is called confirmation bias. This paper proposes the criminal policy debate format as an active learning strategy. Based on the application in an introductory course that is part of a three-year bachelor program in criminology, findings show that the debate format facilitates learning by encouraging students to formulate arguments for and against criminal policy questions.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1184604active learningdebatecritical thinkingcriminal justice education
spellingShingle Caroline Mellgren
Anna-Karin Ivert
Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy
Cogent Education
active learning
debate
critical thinking
criminal justice education
title Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy
title_full Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy
title_fullStr Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy
title_full_unstemmed Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy
title_short Criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy
title_sort criminal policy debate as an active learning strategy
topic active learning
debate
critical thinking
criminal justice education
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1184604
work_keys_str_mv AT carolinemellgren criminalpolicydebateasanactivelearningstrategy
AT annakarinivert criminalpolicydebateasanactivelearningstrategy