Performance of the CURB65, NEWS2, qSOFA, SOFA, REDS, ISARIC 4C, PRIEST and the Novel COVID-19 Severity Scores, Used to Risk-Stratify Emergency Department Patients with COVID-19, on Mortality—An Observational Cohort Study
<b>Objective:</b> To compare the performance of established scoring systems (CURB65, NEWS2, qSOFA, SOFA and REDS) to the newly developed scores (ISARIC 4C, PRIEST and novel COVID-19 severity scores) in mortality prediction for patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in the emergency d...
Main Authors: | Thomas Sheerin, Prerak Dwivedi, Adil Hussain, Narani Sivayoham |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-04-01
|
Series: | COVID |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8112/3/4/40 |
Similar Items
-
An observational cohort study of the performance of the REDS score compared to the SIRS criteria, NEWS2, CURB65, SOFA, MEDS and PIRO scores to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis
by: Narani Sivayoham, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Predictive performance of qSOFA in confirmed COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department
by: Farhad Heydari, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Prognostic performance of the REDS score, SOFA score, NEWS2 score, and the red-flag, NICE high-risk, and SIRS criteria to predict survival at 180 days, in emergency department patients admitted with suspected sepsis – An observational cohort study
by: Narani Sivayoham, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Comparison of SOFA Score, SIRS, qSOFA, and qSOFA + L Criteria in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis
by: Aysin Kilinc Toker, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
Utility of qSOFA and modified SOFA in severe malaria presenting as sepsis
by: Teparrukkul, P, et al.
Published: (2019)