| Summary: | <p>This paper executes a constitutional analysis of Law 26.639 of the Minimum Budget Regime for the Preservation of Glaciers and <span>the Periglacial Environment in Argentina, <br /> </span>with the objective of determining whether the aforementioned norm implies a violation of the National Constitution. For this, the main causes and antecedents that have motivated the constitutional debate of Law 26,639 will be exposed. Likewise, a hermeneutical study will be carried out that will have the purpose of examining the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Nation, entitled: «Barrick Exploraciones Argentinas <span>s.a.</span> and another c / National State s / declarative action of unconstitutionality», issued on June 4, 2019; to finally present as hypothesis the eventual constitutionality of the law. </p>
|
|---|