Fat Plug Myringoplasty Vs Trichloroacetic Acid Cauterization as Office Procedures for Managing Small Central Perforation

Introduction In a series of day care office procedures, techniques like fat plug myringoplasty and Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) cauterization are becoming increasingly popular for managing small central perforations now-a-days[Office1] . These are minor, cost effective procedures and have success r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanchan Sandeep Dhote, Priti Rakesh Dhoke, Vivek Vishwas Harkare, Nitin Vasant Deosthale, Sonali Prabhakar Khadakkar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West Bengal 2020-07-01
Series:Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/203
_version_ 1827295190411378688
author Kanchan Sandeep Dhote
Priti Rakesh Dhoke
Vivek Vishwas Harkare
Nitin Vasant Deosthale
Sonali Prabhakar Khadakkar
author_facet Kanchan Sandeep Dhote
Priti Rakesh Dhoke
Vivek Vishwas Harkare
Nitin Vasant Deosthale
Sonali Prabhakar Khadakkar
author_sort Kanchan Sandeep Dhote
collection DOAJ
description Introduction In a series of day care office procedures, techniques like fat plug myringoplasty and Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) cauterization are becoming increasingly popular for managing small central perforations now-a-days[Office1] . These are minor, cost effective procedures and have success rates that match success rates of conventional tympanoplasty[Office2] . The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial, was to compare the effectiveness of fat plug myringoplasty and chemical cauterization in the management of small centrally located perforations of the pars tensa. Materials and Methods The study was carried out over a period of 2 years on 62 patients selected from ENT OPD in our tertiary health care setup of central India. All the selected patients were grouped into two using a random allocation software EPi Info7.1.1.14. Group A included those who underwent fat plug myringoplasty while group B were those who underwent TCA cauterization. Results At 6 months follow up there was closure of perforation in 29 out of 30(96.6%) patients of group A and 29 out of 32(91%) patients of group B. In both groups success was defined by closure of perforation. Comparison of results was done using Fisher Exact Test. The difference between the success rates of the two procedures was statistically insignificant with p value of 0.6624, indicating that both the office procedures are equally effective and can be used according to the needs of the patients. Conclusion These office procedures can revolutionize the protocol of tympanoplasty which has an obvious higher morbidity and more days of absenteeism as compared to these minor procedures.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:09:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e309832d45f7439fbc6a9394181aa1d2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2395-2407
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T14:15:38Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher The Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West Bengal
record_format Article
series Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
spelling doaj.art-e309832d45f7439fbc6a9394181aa1d22024-04-03T08:47:59ZengThe Association of Otolaryngologists of India, West BengalBengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery2395-24072020-07-0126310.47210/bjohns.2018.v26i3.203Fat Plug Myringoplasty Vs Trichloroacetic Acid Cauterization as Office Procedures for Managing Small Central PerforationKanchan Sandeep Dhote0Priti Rakesh Dhoke1Vivek Vishwas Harkare2Nitin Vasant Deosthale3Sonali Prabhakar Khadakkar4Assistant Lecturer at NKP Salve Institute of medical Sciences and Research Institute NagpurAssociate Professor in ENT Department at NKPSIMS and LMH NagpurHOD and Professor at NKPSIMS and LMH NagpurProfessor at NKPSIMS and LMH NagpurAssistant lecturer at NKPSIMS and LMH NagpurIntroduction In a series of day care office procedures, techniques like fat plug myringoplasty and Trichloroacetic acid (TCA) cauterization are becoming increasingly popular for managing small central perforations now-a-days[Office1] . These are minor, cost effective procedures and have success rates that match success rates of conventional tympanoplasty[Office2] . The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial, was to compare the effectiveness of fat plug myringoplasty and chemical cauterization in the management of small centrally located perforations of the pars tensa. Materials and Methods The study was carried out over a period of 2 years on 62 patients selected from ENT OPD in our tertiary health care setup of central India. All the selected patients were grouped into two using a random allocation software EPi Info7.1.1.14. Group A included those who underwent fat plug myringoplasty while group B were those who underwent TCA cauterization. Results At 6 months follow up there was closure of perforation in 29 out of 30(96.6%) patients of group A and 29 out of 32(91%) patients of group B. In both groups success was defined by closure of perforation. Comparison of results was done using Fisher Exact Test. The difference between the success rates of the two procedures was statistically insignificant with p value of 0.6624, indicating that both the office procedures are equally effective and can be used according to the needs of the patients. Conclusion These office procedures can revolutionize the protocol of tympanoplasty which has an obvious higher morbidity and more days of absenteeism as compared to these minor procedures.https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/203MyringoplastyTrichloroacetic AcidFat Plug
spellingShingle Kanchan Sandeep Dhote
Priti Rakesh Dhoke
Vivek Vishwas Harkare
Nitin Vasant Deosthale
Sonali Prabhakar Khadakkar
Fat Plug Myringoplasty Vs Trichloroacetic Acid Cauterization as Office Procedures for Managing Small Central Perforation
Bengal Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery
Myringoplasty
Trichloroacetic Acid
Fat Plug
title Fat Plug Myringoplasty Vs Trichloroacetic Acid Cauterization as Office Procedures for Managing Small Central Perforation
title_full Fat Plug Myringoplasty Vs Trichloroacetic Acid Cauterization as Office Procedures for Managing Small Central Perforation
title_fullStr Fat Plug Myringoplasty Vs Trichloroacetic Acid Cauterization as Office Procedures for Managing Small Central Perforation
title_full_unstemmed Fat Plug Myringoplasty Vs Trichloroacetic Acid Cauterization as Office Procedures for Managing Small Central Perforation
title_short Fat Plug Myringoplasty Vs Trichloroacetic Acid Cauterization as Office Procedures for Managing Small Central Perforation
title_sort fat plug myringoplasty vs trichloroacetic acid cauterization as office procedures for managing small central perforation
topic Myringoplasty
Trichloroacetic Acid
Fat Plug
url https://bjohns.in/journal3/index.php/bjohns/article/view/203
work_keys_str_mv AT kanchansandeepdhote fatplugmyringoplastyvstrichloroaceticacidcauterizationasofficeproceduresformanagingsmallcentralperforation
AT pritirakeshdhoke fatplugmyringoplastyvstrichloroaceticacidcauterizationasofficeproceduresformanagingsmallcentralperforation
AT vivekvishwasharkare fatplugmyringoplastyvstrichloroaceticacidcauterizationasofficeproceduresformanagingsmallcentralperforation
AT nitinvasantdeosthale fatplugmyringoplastyvstrichloroaceticacidcauterizationasofficeproceduresformanagingsmallcentralperforation
AT sonaliprabhakarkhadakkar fatplugmyringoplastyvstrichloroaceticacidcauterizationasofficeproceduresformanagingsmallcentralperforation