Indigenous condition in health services: comparison of quality of care 2012-2018 for poor population

Objective. To compare the perception of the quality of ambulatory care in users of health services in 2012 and 2018, by indigenous and non-indigenous condition. Materials and methods. With information from two population surveys (Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición [Ensanut] 2012 and Ensanut 100k...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sergio Flores-Hernández, Laura Rosario Mendoza-Alvarado, Waldo Iván Vieyra-Romero, Estephanía Moreno-Zegbe, Arturo Cuauhtémoc Bautista-Morales, Hortensia Reyes-Morales
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública 2019-12-01
Series:Salud Pública de México
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.saludpublica.mx/index.php/spm/article/view/10562
_version_ 1818481591551262720
author Sergio Flores-Hernández
Laura Rosario Mendoza-Alvarado
Waldo Iván Vieyra-Romero
Estephanía Moreno-Zegbe
Arturo Cuauhtémoc Bautista-Morales
Hortensia Reyes-Morales
author_facet Sergio Flores-Hernández
Laura Rosario Mendoza-Alvarado
Waldo Iván Vieyra-Romero
Estephanía Moreno-Zegbe
Arturo Cuauhtémoc Bautista-Morales
Hortensia Reyes-Morales
author_sort Sergio Flores-Hernández
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To compare the perception of the quality of ambulatory care in users of health services in 2012 and 2018, by indigenous and non-indigenous condition. Materials and methods. With information from two population surveys (Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición [Ensanut] 2012 and Ensanut 100k) the quality of care was analyzed based on indicators of structure, process, health outcome and care satisfaction. Results. Between 2012 and 2018, the use of private health services increased; favorable opinion about the conditions of the site, and perception of short waiting times decreased among non-indigenous people. In public health services, the supply of medicines remained high, the laboratory and Rx tests in the same care unit and pharmacology treatment explanation decreased, particularly among non-indigenous patients. Perception of health improvement and satisfaction of care was adequate. Conclusion. An ambulatory care model aimed to response needs and expectations of the most vulnerable population, mainly the indigenous population, is a priority.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T11:37:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e3296ba3f9c94344808f099f50c2b073
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0036-3634
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T11:37:00Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
record_format Article
series Salud Pública de México
spelling doaj.art-e3296ba3f9c94344808f099f50c2b0732022-12-22T01:50:23ZengInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaSalud Pública de México0036-36342019-12-01616, nov-dic71672510.21149/1056216722Indigenous condition in health services: comparison of quality of care 2012-2018 for poor populationSergio Flores-Hernández0Laura Rosario Mendoza-Alvarado1Waldo Iván Vieyra-Romero2Estephanía Moreno-Zegbe3Arturo Cuauhtémoc Bautista-Morales4Hortensia Reyes-Morales5Instituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaInstituto Nacional de Salud PúblicaObjective. To compare the perception of the quality of ambulatory care in users of health services in 2012 and 2018, by indigenous and non-indigenous condition. Materials and methods. With information from two population surveys (Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición [Ensanut] 2012 and Ensanut 100k) the quality of care was analyzed based on indicators of structure, process, health outcome and care satisfaction. Results. Between 2012 and 2018, the use of private health services increased; favorable opinion about the conditions of the site, and perception of short waiting times decreased among non-indigenous people. In public health services, the supply of medicines remained high, the laboratory and Rx tests in the same care unit and pharmacology treatment explanation decreased, particularly among non-indigenous patients. Perception of health improvement and satisfaction of care was adequate. Conclusion. An ambulatory care model aimed to response needs and expectations of the most vulnerable population, mainly the indigenous population, is a priority.http://www.saludpublica.mx/index.php/spm/article/view/10562calidad de la atención en saludpoblación indí¬genaatención ambulatoriapobrezapoblaciones vulnerables
spellingShingle Sergio Flores-Hernández
Laura Rosario Mendoza-Alvarado
Waldo Iván Vieyra-Romero
Estephanía Moreno-Zegbe
Arturo Cuauhtémoc Bautista-Morales
Hortensia Reyes-Morales
Indigenous condition in health services: comparison of quality of care 2012-2018 for poor population
Salud Pública de México
calidad de la atención en salud
población indí¬gena
atención ambulatoria
pobreza
poblaciones vulnerables
title Indigenous condition in health services: comparison of quality of care 2012-2018 for poor population
title_full Indigenous condition in health services: comparison of quality of care 2012-2018 for poor population
title_fullStr Indigenous condition in health services: comparison of quality of care 2012-2018 for poor population
title_full_unstemmed Indigenous condition in health services: comparison of quality of care 2012-2018 for poor population
title_short Indigenous condition in health services: comparison of quality of care 2012-2018 for poor population
title_sort indigenous condition in health services comparison of quality of care 2012 2018 for poor population
topic calidad de la atención en salud
población indí¬gena
atención ambulatoria
pobreza
poblaciones vulnerables
url http://www.saludpublica.mx/index.php/spm/article/view/10562
work_keys_str_mv AT sergiofloreshernandez indigenousconditioninhealthservicescomparisonofqualityofcare20122018forpoorpopulation
AT laurarosariomendozaalvarado indigenousconditioninhealthservicescomparisonofqualityofcare20122018forpoorpopulation
AT waldoivanvieyraromero indigenousconditioninhealthservicescomparisonofqualityofcare20122018forpoorpopulation
AT estephaniamorenozegbe indigenousconditioninhealthservicescomparisonofqualityofcare20122018forpoorpopulation
AT arturocuauhtemocbautistamorales indigenousconditioninhealthservicescomparisonofqualityofcare20122018forpoorpopulation
AT hortensiareyesmorales indigenousconditioninhealthservicescomparisonofqualityofcare20122018forpoorpopulation