The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly popular as a procedure for the treatment of breast cancer and as a prophylactic procedure for those at high risk of developing the disease. However, it remains a controversial option due to questions regarding its oncological safety and concerns regard...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannah Louise Headon, Abdul Kasem, Kefah Mokbel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2016-07-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2016.43.4.328
_version_ 1811184488632287232
author Hannah Louise Headon
Abdul Kasem
Kefah Mokbel
author_facet Hannah Louise Headon
Abdul Kasem
Kefah Mokbel
author_sort Hannah Louise Headon
collection DOAJ
description Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly popular as a procedure for the treatment of breast cancer and as a prophylactic procedure for those at high risk of developing the disease. However, it remains a controversial option due to questions regarding its oncological safety and concerns regarding locoregional recurrence. This systematic review with a pooled analysis examines the current literature regarding NSM, including locoregional recurrence and complication rates. Systematic electronic searches were conducted using the PubMed database and the Ovid database for studies reporting the indications for NSM and the subsequent outcomes. Studies between January 1970 and January 2015 (inclusive) were analysed if they met the inclusion criteria. Pooled descriptive statistics were performed. Seventy-three studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis, yielding 12,358 procedures. After a mean follow up of 38 months (range, 7.4–156 months), the overall pooled locoregional recurrence rate was 2.38%, the overall complication rate was 22.3%, and the overall incidence of nipple necrosis, either partial or total, was 5.9%. Significant heterogeneity was found among the published studies and patient selection was affected by tumour characteristics. We concluded that NSM appears to be an oncologically safe option for appropriately selected patients, with low rates of locoregional recurrence. For NSM to be performed, tumours should be peripherally located, smaller than 5 cm in diameter, located more than 2 cm away from the nipple margin, and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative. A separate histopathological examination of the subareolar tissue and exclusion of malignancy at this site is essential for safe oncological practice. Long-term follow-up studies and prospective cohort studies are required in order to determine the best reconstructive methods.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:13:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e32c25d3f19140e480e3045204ec0b4b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:13:04Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format Article
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-e32c25d3f19140e480e3045204ec0b4b2022-12-22T04:22:32ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Archives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712016-07-01430432833810.5999/aps.2016.43.4.328691The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 ProceduresHannah Louise Headon0Abdul Kasem1Kefah Mokbel2Department of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, London, UKDepartment of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, Medway NHS Trust, Medway, UKDepartment of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery, London Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, London, UKNipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly popular as a procedure for the treatment of breast cancer and as a prophylactic procedure for those at high risk of developing the disease. However, it remains a controversial option due to questions regarding its oncological safety and concerns regarding locoregional recurrence. This systematic review with a pooled analysis examines the current literature regarding NSM, including locoregional recurrence and complication rates. Systematic electronic searches were conducted using the PubMed database and the Ovid database for studies reporting the indications for NSM and the subsequent outcomes. Studies between January 1970 and January 2015 (inclusive) were analysed if they met the inclusion criteria. Pooled descriptive statistics were performed. Seventy-three studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the analysis, yielding 12,358 procedures. After a mean follow up of 38 months (range, 7.4–156 months), the overall pooled locoregional recurrence rate was 2.38%, the overall complication rate was 22.3%, and the overall incidence of nipple necrosis, either partial or total, was 5.9%. Significant heterogeneity was found among the published studies and patient selection was affected by tumour characteristics. We concluded that NSM appears to be an oncologically safe option for appropriately selected patients, with low rates of locoregional recurrence. For NSM to be performed, tumours should be peripherally located, smaller than 5 cm in diameter, located more than 2 cm away from the nipple margin, and human epidermal growth factor 2-negative. A separate histopathological examination of the subareolar tissue and exclusion of malignancy at this site is essential for safe oncological practice. Long-term follow-up studies and prospective cohort studies are required in order to determine the best reconstructive methods.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2016.43.4.328mastectomybreast neoplasmrecurrence
spellingShingle Hannah Louise Headon
Abdul Kasem
Kefah Mokbel
The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures
Archives of Plastic Surgery
mastectomy
breast neoplasm
recurrence
title The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures
title_full The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures
title_fullStr The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures
title_full_unstemmed The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures
title_short The Oncological Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature with a Pooled Analysis of 12,358 Procedures
title_sort oncological safety of nipple sparing mastectomy a systematic review of the literature with a pooled analysis of 12 358 procedures
topic mastectomy
breast neoplasm
recurrence
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2016.43.4.328
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahlouiseheadon theoncologicalsafetyofnipplesparingmastectomyasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithapooledanalysisof12358procedures
AT abdulkasem theoncologicalsafetyofnipplesparingmastectomyasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithapooledanalysisof12358procedures
AT kefahmokbel theoncologicalsafetyofnipplesparingmastectomyasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithapooledanalysisof12358procedures
AT hannahlouiseheadon oncologicalsafetyofnipplesparingmastectomyasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithapooledanalysisof12358procedures
AT abdulkasem oncologicalsafetyofnipplesparingmastectomyasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithapooledanalysisof12358procedures
AT kefahmokbel oncologicalsafetyofnipplesparingmastectomyasystematicreviewoftheliteraturewithapooledanalysisof12358procedures